>Here's the effort we will never put in a Pokemon game bros.
>>743741259Anyone got any screenshots of all the seethe?
>>743741259blame Nintendo and TPC for that
I'm kind of excited for this release actually. Some say it's like Nier+Stellar Blade+E33, sounds fun.
>>743741362Nintendo tried to give them more money and time for S&V but GF said no.You already know this you dumbass, it was in the teraleak.Gamefreak are just shit.
>>743741259They're not the devs though lmao
>>743741412Gamefreak showed with BoR that they are able to make better games. Whatever is causing the Pokemon games to be slop nowadays is fault of the other 2 companies involved.
>>743741479You're so fucking retarded holy shit, Nintendo and TPC can't tell Gamefreak what to do even if they tried, and they have multiple times.
I would never trust these devs after their trash tier pokemon games with 0 effort they put in . I will never invest into their works financially emotionally or any amount of my time.
>>743741575Nintendo and TPC are the ones asking for the almost yearly Pokemon games and the ones asking for DLCs to be made along with many other decisions. Gamefreak can make better game, it's up to them to ask for it.
>>743741479>Gamefreak showed with BoR that they are able to make better games1- Beast of reincarnation isn't out2- it's outsourced
>>743741360Seethe? Explain
>>743741259>dabbing on pokemonBasedFuck pokemon and its fanbase
>>743741762And as we have ALREADY SEEN, Gamefreak has said NO. Multiple times.What part are you not getting?Are you actually brain damaged?
>>743742330Gamefreak is doing what they are being told to do, it's not them saying no. It's TPC and Nintendo not asking for it.
>>743741479Nintendo and TPC offered that external developers could help with development. Game Freak said no, because even though they desperately want to do anything other than Pokemon, they understand that at the moment it is their only successful thing, and everything else they've tried doing has failed.Until they actually get a success that they can turn into a franchise, Game Freak will insist on being solo devs on mainline Pokemon games.>>743742696THEY LITERALLY SUGGEST EXTERNAL DEVELOPMENT HELP. Are you fucking daft or something?
>>743742735>Gamefreak said no when offered to work with external devs>Yet Beast of Reincarnation has multiple external devs involvedNintendofags are so retarded
>>743743449Because that's not a Pokemon game. If that game succeeds, it's GameFreak's own project, and they can fully decide what to do with the IP.If Pokemon game with bunch of external devs would be significantly better received than solo GF ones, Nintendo and TPC would be going "Oh hey, that worked pretty well. Why don't you have even less of a development role in next one, Game Freak?"
>>743741259Looks like low effort ue5 slop
Why are you people wanking off a game that isn't out yet?
>>743742735What's stopping Nintendo from telling another company to make a Pokeslop game, kind of like what Niantic did
>>743741259>UE5 slop sekiro clone with quixel mecascan environments>EffortWhy are gamers so easily fooled?
>>743743990Do you know what "hype" is?
>>743744105Posting with the mindset that pokemon games are given more effort than UE5 slop.Why are YOU so easily fooled?
>>743744080Probably contractual reasons. We've had bunch of non-mainline games made by devs other than GF, but GF are only ones that can handle the mainline stuff.Also, Pokemon as IP is partially owned by three companies. Nintendo, Pokemon Company and Game Freak. So GF does have say in what is done with it.
>>743741387Wider
>>743744105More effort than pokemon
>>743744119Why are you people wanking off a game that isn't out yet?
The dog is going to die at the end isnt he?
>>743741259Preordered a copy. Hopefully it's good.
>>743741259>soulslike>efforthUH?
>>743741387https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m2OFgl_O6j0I'd suggest you dampen that excitement
>>743744080Remember Mystery Dungeon?
>>743741259Looks promising. Good job, shill
>>743742209NTA, and I only caught a glimpse of it myself, but I read some nips pissing themselves crying about Game Freak betraying pokemon/nintendo for making something that isn't a pokemon game/a nintendo exclusive
>>743741259How many times have they you know..
Google says it's available for everything except Switch 1 or 2? lmao what
Thanks, I like it.
>>743744340>>743745037what if i told you both are equally lazy? there's nothing brave or technologically challenging about making a sekiro clone in an era of sekiro clones, especially since designing a combat around hitboxes colliding is as easy as it gets (hence the amount of souls and sekiro clones on the market)
>>743746221okay, and? that's most games
>>743741259It’s all outsourced tho
>>743741864this + the recent gameplay vids i've seenhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m2OFgl_O6j0killed any interest i had for this game. It's clearly outsourced to the Chinese and it shows. Stiff animations, mediocre soulless gameplay, etc.
>>743746157I have hard time believing that people would actually get upset about it now. Game Freak has tried making non-Pokemon games for years now, and they've not worked out at all for them.Hell, some of those different games were even published by SEGA.
>>743747179>>743741259Harmoknight was kino and I really really wish they made a harmoknight 2
>effort>look inside>it's the most generic and bland nier/sekiro/stellar blade action game everLook I'm not saying the game looks bad, but it doesn't exactly look high effort.
>>743741259looks cool
>>743743887>writing a fanfic instead of accepting it's TPC and Nintendo's direction what hurts the franchise
>>743741864>we outsourced a bunch of jeets to cobble together some slop for us
>>743749083We know that other two suggested to GF that other studios could help with development, and GF refused.
Have they actually shown it off? I can't believe it's out in 13 days
The odds of this ending up with a Metacritic of 90 feel about as likely as it ending up with a Metacritic of 70.90 because it looks very good, 70 because it's Gamefreak. Their track record since the start of the Switch 1 generation speaks for itself. I want to buy this but it's 100% a wait for reviews game.
>>743750948idk I watched the IGN preview. it seems parry focused, visually looks decent but some of the animations especially on the boss are a bit jankhttps://youtu.be/sUqtfP9P4aU?si=4dqrXwQw50dFBu70&t=288
>>743751107>Their track record since the start of the Switch 1 generation speaks for itselfTrack record since 2016, actually. Much earlier if you go for their original games
