Why do they bother with this IP?
>>743742026LMAOSPLATROONS IN SHAMBLES
>>743742026oof. That's with the Nintendo bonus too so it's like a 50 in reality.
>>743742026Cause it's one of their most popular franchises especially in Japan?
?
>>743742026OOF another mediocre tendie slop
>>743743589>Nintendo bonus applied in real time
Guardian Review:>This is the biggest surprise about Splatoon Raiders: it is pedestrian. If you’ve played one of dozens of modern cooperative action games, you’ve played this. You have upgraded your gear and compared weapon stats and divined synergies between abilities in order to throw your character into the meat grinder over and over again, watching overwhelming hordes eventually become trivial as your stats improve, your arsenal more varied. There is only so much that Splatoon’s ink-fuelled weaponry and charming DIY design sensibilities can do to elevate this experience.Tbh, sounds like a fair criticism, you just expect something more ingenious from Nintendo than a run of the mill looter shooter with all the tried (and tired) isms of the genre.
>>743742026Oh no tendies, we lost bigly
>>743743686>this game genre is the game genre : 40/100no that's not a fair review at all wtf are you smocking
>>743742026Looks like the journos didn't get checks.
>>743744016Better than journos spamming quotes like "its a breath of fresh air", "It rekindles my childhood" whichever way they say that one, "Its an innovative game (Without sub context)"
marathon flopped
>>743742026>>743743589before and after the paycheck came in
>>743745194True but everyone who ius able to rub two braincells together know it's a load of shit, especially if they are all using the same buzzwords.Remember how many said 'Return to Form' for DragonAge: Veilguard?
>>743745551what does that have to do with anything?also it didn't
>>743746873The Guardian glazed that game, which challenges their credibility
>>743746858it was a return to form thoughthe higher-ups just demanded they forced that disgusting freak in there which spoiled everything else about the game
>>743742026>81Why these threads even exist?https://opencritic.com/game/20454/splatoon-raiders
>>743747569Gotta make it so it always looks like Nintendo is failing after all.Makes everyone else look better as a distraction.
>>743747708jesus christ he is fucking beyond afraid.
>Oh cool, it's Splatoon, but it's a game focused on Salmon RunAMAZING? HELLO?>It's single-player, and co-op if you wanna invite a friend or two.WHYYYYYYYYYYYYYY?You should just queue up, join a match with some strangers, get some loot and go again.
>>743743589paycheck cleared
>>743747840Than do that? Why does the option to play through a campaign alone affect you if you're not prevented from doing the whole thing in co-op?
>>743747569>>743747708>80 is bad according to the schizosAnti-nintendo discord are so desperate for a win
>>743747840>You should just queue up, join a match with some strangers, get some loot and go again.go eat your cowshit slop somewhere else, peasant
>>743748071The only friend that plays video-games exclusively plays PS2 games emulatedY'know when you go into a gloryhole and the cock comes out and you're not sure if it's a girl or a guy? That's how I want my matchmaking experience. I don't wanna join a discord to make 18 year old Switch 2 players play games with me.
>>743748181As far as I know you don't need to organise anything if you don't want to.There's direct invites which you're ruling out.There's a pool system again so people in a group can quickly assemble.or there's a random SOS where anyone can just join.I'm sure one of those fits your faggot analogy.
>>743747569>checks that retarded site>dave the diver is a 92 what genuinely changed?
>>743748304>There's a pool system / There's random SOSI'm too old, can you just tell me if this has matchmaking?
>>74374401640/100 for a game that doesn't put anything new forward is fair if that person has played a lot of similar games that they think are better. That doesn't mean it will be a 40/100 to some Nintendo only gamer that has never played games like Borderlands before or doesn't play ARPGs with similar loops, it might be a 10 to them. But reviews are subjective, that's why it's generally better to find a reviewer with similar tastes to yours instead of listening to randoms.
>>743748341>press button>people joinHave you ever played a game before?
>>743748395ok that's what I needthank ya
>>743748389> it's generally better to find a reviewer with similar tastes to yours instead of listening to randoms.It would be better to have a reviewer that removes their bias entirely when making reviews more than finding one that sucks off specific types of games.
>>743748548You're never removing a bias from someone. You should just watch or read them knowing their bias.
>>743748548That's impossible. If you ask someone who has played hundreds or thousands of RPGs to review a game they will have a much different opinion than someone who is playing a rpg for the first time. Someone who has played the very best a genre has to offer is going to have a much different frame of reference and that's not really a bad thing.
>mods keep deleting the threadsCurious, but not surprising since this is a tendie boardAnyway, is Splatoon 2 worth getting on the switch 1 solely for the campaign? The splatoon 1 campaign was kinda meh
>>743748821its surprising they didn't ban the guy who keeps spamming that specific one image. almost seems biasness to me
>minutely snoy cope spam
>>743747840raping this thing right now btw
>>743748548>removes their biasThat cuts both ways anon. There are outlets giving this game 9s and 10s for Splatoon extraction shooter.
>>743748821>Deleting a few of the more than 10+ Splatoon seethe threads makes it a tendie board
>>743748917>>743748578>>743748767Yeah after sitting on it it wouldn't work at all. I gguess the closest you would have is for them to at least mention their bias, if they have one but that's about it.>>743748821They deleted one and there was 5 others all posted around the same time.Mayve check the catalog before making more.
I hacked my og switch shortly after Splatoon 3 came out and never got to play it. Is it worth getting on the switch 2 and is it the game still active? I imagine the fact that we got this means Splatoon 4 is at least two years away
>>743749198they should ban both falseflaggers same with the guy who keeps spamming that one image in every thread that doesn't "align with nintendo"
>>743749770It’s still active but the skill floor is high
