>>744547728
yes

It's good for gaymen, but it's really phenomenal for movies.

>>744547728
>is it that much of a game changer
Yes
>at least worth the price?
Harder question to answer since on top of being more expensive they'll also probably have a shorter lifespan, at least on average

>>744547728
Like everything you get used to it fast but before that happens yes it is night and day, IPS will be unplayable after you get used to OLED

it aint worth it if you game more than 2 hours per day, you'll 100% get burn in, people even take 1--2 hours breaks to ease the panel. right now oled is a meme, twice as bright half as long

From what I understand after doing some research woled is worse than qdoled at ideal conditions (no lighting in your room) but if there's some light even if it's indirect like sun leaking around curtains or whatever then woled quickly becomes vastly superior while qdoled starts to show blacks as purples.

>>744547996
Holy shit what is this stupidity? Dude is just making shit up as he goes.

>>744548046
QDOLED is straight up better. WOLED just came earlier and what normies are adjusted to. Go to any big electronics store that has TVs for display and the best ones are all QD from color, viewing angles, the stuff that makes normies turn their head with shopping. WOLED is only recommended if you're on a budget like all the AOC/Gigabyte cheap oleds are WOLED.

OLED is a massive game changer for games and movies. I can't ever go back. It would be like going from HD back to SD. Just don't go 4K like I did. That's a meme and it costs many times more to run games at that resolution.

File: 20260802190923.jpg (126 KB, 867x364)

126 KB JPG

>>744548046
>>744548241
From left to right woled, tandem woled (the most expensive by far), qdoled.

How they react to a well lit environment. Yes qdoled starts to turn blacks into magenta. Obviously you can have far less light than this, it's just a test, plus you need to account for it not being a naked eye observer.

get ready for 500 posts about burn in from people that haven't looked at a modern panel and just parrot shit they heard 10 years ago

also the random retard saying he'll wait for miniLED when they're over $50,000 and have no indication they'll fix the pixel density issues any time soon

>>744548397
any electronics store is going to have bright as fuck lights. the qd in person is still going to have better viewing angles and colors and no grey banding unlike woled.

>>744548397
All the tandems I see on reddit have disgusting banding on grey.

File: file.png (311 KB, 768x576)

311 KB PNG

I have a 240Hz 24.5 inches VA with 1ms response time, and it just fucking works even after many yrs. No OLED nor HDR meme can make me switch. Manufacturers should make "retro monitors" however. It would sell like hot cake.

File: 1773464763020537.png (507 KB, 824x608)

507 KB PNG

Daily OLED shilling thread I see? Gotta earn those paychecks.

>>744547728
No. It's scam tech that will fail you, by design. There is no good display tech btw.

>>744548491
>viewing angles
I'm sitting in front of my desk when I use my computer.

Also, what was it I said? qdoled is superior in ideal light conditions while woled becomes better if you have to deal with some lighting. This >>744548397 seems to corroborate at least the last part of my post. Obviously that's an exaggerated environment but it does show the different behaviors I mentioned.

>>744547728
Get an OLED TV if you're going to be a retard.
>But muh 2ms response time!!!
Isn't fucking real. OLED has so many fucking problems that have been talked about over and over in every thread. If you're going to buy a garbage OLED display just get a TV because the monitors are way overpriced and 4k on a tiny monitor KILLS details, no matter what retard tries to say otherwise.

Yeah. I just have a black wallpaper with nothing on it. Monitor itself will turn off as well as ask to do a pixel thing every day or so. No burn in so far just buy a decent one on black friday

>>744547728
Yes.
I think led to oled is a bigger upgrade than 1080 to 4k.

>you can get one for 300 now
https://www.newegg.com/asrock-pgo27qsa-27-qhd-240hz-qd-oled-black/p/N82E16824028026
https://www.newegg.com/gigabyte-go27q24a-27-qd-oled-240-hz-qd-oled/p/N82E16824012118
any thoughts on these? might bite the bullet

>>744547728
Yes.
I think led to oled is a bigger upgrade than 1080 to 4k.
Im so glad i chanced it and got an oled instead of a mini led. $1200 well spent
Also im talking about a TV, not a monitor

>>744548598
>>744548576
I use 4k projector with a 110" light grey screen. I have my Switch 2, Steam Machine, and 4k Panasonic Blu-ray player hooked up to it. What's more important for movies is resolution. What's more important for games is visual clarity. And having such a fuck huge screen gives me both.
>Quick response times
You will never use this unless you're some MLG gaymer.
>Burn in
It will happen on any display, it's just more prone on OLED because each pixel is used more. Ask anyone about subtitle burn in.
>4k
Basically useless for games because of the hardware demand, 1080p upscaled to 4k is more than enough. And before anyone says the I'm wrong just a reminder that there are barely any games actually designed for NATIVE 4k. Everything modern runs on fake frames and fake resolution.
>HDR
Absolute huge fucking meme for movies, but only good for SOME modern games, and only truly visible on OLED that can reach high brightness without washing out colors, which 80% of displays cannot do.

>>744549116
Poorfag hands wrote this post

>>744548997
Those are woled, see discussion about w and qd earlier in this thread or elsewhere. Can't see if they're glossy or matte finish on a quick look. Some people really prefer one over the other. In my case I dislike how matte difuses the light all over the monitor and much prefer the glass like feeling of glossy.

Keep in mind your freensync/g-sync options depending if you're on AMD or nvidia. No budget OLED is going to have enough nits for HDR to really come into play (you'd want over 600 nits) so the poor HDR can mostly be ignored as it won't really matter anyway. 0.3ms instead of 0.2 like most monitors but shouldn't matter either.

>>744547728
I bought a 32" 4k OLED for 800 dollars, the trade off was a max of ~150hz but my 4070Ti wasnt going to reliably go above that for games that are worth the trouble to do that anyway

I like it, had it for about 15 months now with no burn in even though i practically live at my monitor as a nolife chud

I do have to baby it though

>>744548253
Movies especially because they really push the HDR. A good 4K transfer with Dolby Vision is better than seeing it in theaters.

>>744549324
Sorry babe but my projector + screen + steam machine + switch 2 is more expensive than your Dell PC with your OLED tiny monitor.

>>744550409
That's because 99% of theatres still have old bulb projectors with a fucked yellowed screen. HDR/Dolby Vision is genuinely a scam because 99.9% of the films you watched were not made for HDR. Its like people wanting a remastered Dolby Atmos or 7.1 surround soundtrack for Citizen Kane, which came out in 1.0 aka mono. Lawrence of Arabia wasn't shot for HDR. The cinematographer of Blade Runner wasn't thinking about HDR. Its that simple. 4k resolution with no DNR as God Intended > HDR digital manipulation post processing.

>>744547728
OLED is fine. If you were smart enough to make the most of OLED, you'd know what to do without OLED well enough to make it not worth purchasing. Don't bother OP. Just get 1 or less ms response time display, HDR is a scam. That's everything you need to know

>>744550826
I swear projectors are for poorfags larpers or for people with actual money for a real home theater. You aren't the latter. Don't event talk to me unless you have a LCoS, 3LCD, a 3 chip DLP. Everything else is shit tier.

>>744550993
You don't have to have DNR to have HDR. A transfer from an analog source can absolutely be mastered for HDR and look much better for it. I just watched my 4K Blade Runner disc with HDR yesterday, and it looked utterly phenomenal with a shit ton of film grain to boot. I doubt the creatives involved with Lawrence of Arabia and Blade Runner were thinking about OLED panels either, so why aren't you spooling up the original film reels when you view them? You're being very silly with this puritanical nonsense.

>>744550993
Film has more stops of dynamic range than what SDR can deliver you midwit.

>>744547996
Are you fucking retarded? My LG OLED tutns itself off if it's left inactive too long.

>>744551996
I turned all the pixel shift, screensaver, and pixel refresh stuff off because it was annoying.

>>744547996
Dude just admit you're poor

File: 1a38567e-e003-4f4e-a926-d(...).jpg (2.78 MB, 4080x3072)

2.78 MB JPG

Built this early last before the insane price hikes. It'd cost over 3,000 USD now.
I regret getting a 4TB SSD, I should I gotten a smaller SSD and bought a 5080 or used 5090.

ASUS Prime 5070Ti OC 16BG ($750)
Ryzen 7 9850X3D ($400)
(Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet ($24) I'm too lazy to do thermal paste)
Kingston FURY Beast 32GB DDR5 CL36 ($100)
WD_BLACK SN8100 4TB ($450)
MSI MAG B850 Tomahawk MAX ($180)
be quiet! Pure Power 13 M 850W ($90)
be quiet! Pure Loop 3 280mm ($85)
Fractal Design Meshify 3 Black Solid ($120)

>>744552070
So you fucked yourself. Those features exist to protect your screen.

>>744552481
I just bought a pre-built for the first time in forever because it was cheaper than building out a new platform. About 4.5k for a 5090, 64GB of DDR5, a 9900X3D, and two 2 TB M.2 SSDs. This was months back, though. Same tower now is 6.5k. What a fucking joke.

>>744547728
>is it that much of a game changer
yeah, they're pretty nice.
>worth the price
1440p 240hz OLEDs are like $300 off sale now, so yeah. really no reason to not just upgrade unless you want to wait another year for them to be ~$200

No. A custom colour profile will do a good enough job. Getting a screen that has burn in makes spending a lot of money on a scree on a bad idea.

Micro LED might solve it, it's said to, that could be a lie. MicroLED are made now, just at high prices of $50,000 to $200,000. Also the concept of using multiple screens to build a large one might take off with them. And if so, the same screen available for a long time. A led screen can't be expected to last without burn in for more than a few months. One for a lifetime is not possible. They tech is defective, even intentionally offered knowing it's defects in order for people to buy new screens.

>>744547728
>game changer
Plasma did perfect blacks 30 years ago.
AND they don't have any motion blur....
But you all went and bought LCD's for some retarded reason.

OLED is a joke. Calling it a game changer when it doesn't even match tech from 3 decades ago is the height of stupidity.

>>744554223
I still have a ZT60 and Plasma is not better than OLED. Plasma blacks weren't perfect and they also have phosphor trails. Not to mention burn in was never solved and was much worse than what OLEDs are now.

Only combined with strobing aka black frame insertion aka pulsar.
Otherwise you won't get to see the perfect response times in the first place.
oled TVs are amazing. For desktop eh, they're the best, but maybe not worth the hassle.
If you can buy only a single display they forget it. monitor + TV is the best and there's no way you will burn in if you leave the oled for only gaming and stuff

What is it about burn in specifically that seems to mind break so many people in here?

Doesn't seem to be such a massive deal to me that my monitor is going to last 7 years instead of 9 (which is what my last IPS lasted). In fact, 7 years of a much better monitor seems like a better deal to me compared to 9 years of a much worse one. I'm not getting those 7 or 9 years back. I'd rather enjoy them on higher quality instead of saving a few extra bucks. I can make money back, I can't reroll the time I spent on something of lower quality.

I got one and it's really nice until there's a black loading screen and the blacks are so deep it reflects my pale ass titties in perfect HD back to me, reminding me of the worthlessness of my existence.

Then the game loads and I' fully immersed again. It's a roller coaster

>>744554929
Should have gotten matte instead of glossy.

>>744547728
Only on games that actually support HDR and do a good implementation of it. Even then you have to use RenoDX to fix some of those native implementations like fixing the black floor.
Injecting HDR into SDR games is where the improvements are more incremental in what you'll notice. I'm more speaking about HDR rather than whether OLED is a game changer. It's arguably alright for SDR and you'll get some benefits with things like being able to get deeper blacks i suppose and the actual response times will be the main draw.

>>744547728
I love mine personally, but I almost wish that I had gotten a 4k one

>>744547728
yep. i don't even care about burn-in anymore, if this shit breaks i'll just get another one. i think that explains well enough how much of an upgrade it is

>>744553745
microled is not even close to being ready for mass production. the manufacturing process is extremely long and expensive, the pixel density is shit, and there's reliability/longevity issues worse than OLED associated with them at the moment. I would not expect to see widespread consumer (affordable) microLED any time before 2035 minimum

OLED is just the best way to experience HDR. Walking along dim caves and city streets, with candles and lanterns popping out of the screen. It's hard to describe why it's so good, the picture is just so deep set and tactile from the combination of perfect black and glossy finish. Having no black floor or inherent underglow makes everything look rich and physical, almost 3D. They are less convincing in bright broad daylight scenes overall, but even then, newer tandem models can hold 360 nits full screen white, and 800+ nits at around 25%.

what means a monitor has proper OLED or proper HDR support? I see everything these days claims to have it but I'm pretty doubtful

>>744553745
>A led screen can't be expected to last without burn in for more than a few months.
People really fucking need to stop parroting this kind of stupid ass shit. Even the stress tests done specifically to get burn-in that are nowhere near anyone's use case don't result in burn-in after a few months.

Actually you know what? If you want to believe it keep going and enjoy years of horrible IPS (I've been there) or shitty cheap chink mini-led's, it's what you get for being retarded.

>>744559082
>OLED is just the best way to experience HDR.
It's my understanding that even if it is OLED, unless it has 500 or 600 nits+ then HDR wouldn't work that well. Most of the more budget options I've looked into are at like 300.

>>744560907
Yeah a decent quality OLED is going to be $600 at least. That's not a great deal of money for a monitor IMO, I have a 27" Asus XG27AQWMG. I remember when we got our first flat screen widescreen LCD as a kid around 2004 and it looked massive, felt like having a cinema in the living room. My monitor is the size of that, and cost me less, even less still accounting for inflation. People pay that much for their phones.

If money really is tight for you though rather than just being overly frugal with it, you could go as low as $350 for the Alienware AW2726DM. That monitor can hit 400 nits in a 25% window, probably more in a smaller window. You would still get really good contrast compared to a typical IPS display since the black floor is infinite. There are a few others around that price for similar specs.

>>744560907
>It's my understanding that even if it is OLED, unless it has 500 or 600 nits+ then HDR wouldn't work that well.
your understanding is wrong
99.9% of OLED screens can do what he's describing (dark scenes with extremely bright (1000+ nit) small highlights)
the 300 nit figure is literally for a full white screen. its a non issue

File: mtrs.jpg (712 KB, 3520x971)

712 KB JPG

>>744547728
Yup, it's great if you want to escape the shackles of IPS

>>744562289
HDR is about range, don't need as bright highlights if the floor is infinite

Oh, fuck yeah it's worth it. Picked one up a few months ago and every game has looked kickass on this bitch. RE9 looked amazing. I notice things look a lot more clear in motion and there's zero ghosting.

>>744562935
Which one did you get do you mind linking it?

>>744562093
To go a little bit off track here, I really just dislike big screens for my monitor. For tv's, it's cool. But for monitor, 27 is pushing the limit of how far I'm willing to go. Anything beyond 27 I really would not like to have at all. Maybe that's why they start curving those bitches.

>>744551996
Are you illiterate? He said actively using it for long periods of time, not leaving it on.

It's nice but you'll never have enough light to take full advantage unless you've got ring lights pointed at your shit, so don't bother stressing over it.

>>744551823
>so why aren't you spooling up the original film reels when you view them?
Because I'm already watching them on my projector.

>>744551834
And yet no cinema in 120 years has displayed those films with HDR. IMAX is just BARELY setting up HDR theaters with Laser projectors. It almost as if.... HDR is a fucking scam.

>>744554223
Plasma was discontinued because LCD was cheaper to export from the Chinese sweatshops. Its also retarded that OLED panels for years were literally made only by LG so if you bought a Sony or Samsung you were just paying for the name. I only experienced a Plasma once at a friends house and I popped in a black and white movie on DVD on his Blu-ray player and it looked like HD.

>>744554830
Because your OLED is not going to last 7 years. These things are meant to be used for 3-4 years and then replace them with the latest OLED. At least that's how TV manufacturers are working towards because the smart app shit becomes discontinued and apps become unsupported.

>>744564348
More realistically in 2026 I would give it between 5 and 6. For monitors. I don't know what's going on for TV's.

>>744559595
OLED is a type of panel technology where every pixel is self illuminated. Meaning every pixel turns on or off. LCDs are back lit by several lights that turn on and off groups of pixels. So if a game has HDR where a 4 pixel wide light shines brightly it will make those 4 pixels glow, while on an LCD multiple pixels around those 4 pixels will also glow.

HDR is basically post processing that lets the panel do highlights and shadows dedicated to the rest of the image while retaining color. Like imagine a red light, if you add more brightness it becomes washed out and pink. But a good panel can make that red light become a BRIGHT red that glows. ANY panel can do HDR, but it's only OLEDs with high brightness (NITs) capabilities that can actually showcase it properly. And you need to be in a dark room, beucase most OLEDs are not as bright as LCDs. Like the Switch 2 screen is LCD with wide color gamut and it does HDR.

>>744562995
LG 27GX90A. Caught it for like $540 before tax as some kind of open box thing. Was mostly looking to get my feet wet to see if OLED was even worth it.

>>744564737
Is that 480hz? Do you really need that much?

>>744564129
>expanded color gamut is a scam

lol the lies poorfags tell themselves

>>744554830
>7 years
All the oled cocksuckers I've seen have admitted they'll replace their screen every 2 years. When I was young a 20 year old television was still working just fine.

I have a monitor that is 7 years old now, about as good as the day I bought it and will probably last me another 7 because I refuse to buy this gay OLED shit that is bad for text and demands twelve kinds of babying just to get me into the planned-obsolescence cycle of constantly buying new shit like a retard. I refuse to spend car-level quantities of money on technology over a decade, it's insane how much fucking garbage I'm expected to have now. Fuck your smart TVs, fuck your OLED shit that has a half life for quality that can be measured in single digit years.

>>744564847
>replace their screen every 2 years
Are we having this conversation in 2015? What's going on?

File: 1785666105377468.jpg (93 KB, 720x720)

93 KB JPG

I got an oled monitor for 900 dollars and bumped it into my monitor arm while plugging in cables
now it has a small scratch in the corner
it's completely invisible unless I have the screen off and shine a flashlight on it but I still want to violently kill myself

>>744564847
yeah I have a 7 year old IPS too and it looks night and day next to my new OLED

>>744564794
I don't know if I need 480, but it seems like some games do benefit from having the extra space. I know when I use DLSS it's really smooth, but I don't overdo it. Usually 2x at most.

>>744547728
As a modern display? Yeah. It eliminates a significant amount of input delay but not entirely. It also has the drawback of burn in.

>>744564997
Explain to me why the biggest fanboy faggots of your shit say it is "bad for text" and "blurry". I am not a 2 year old. I do not need the loudest, most contrasting colors if I cannot also use it to read a fucking document, because I am not a retarded zoomer who uses their shitty mobile phone for everything.

>>744565013
>benefit from having the extra space
Is that true? Is 200 fps on a 240hz monitor worse than 200 fps on a 480hz monitor?

>>744565025
I feel like you'd have to be trying to get burn in. I have a bad habit of just sitting on the desktop not doing anything and spacing out or walking off and letting it sit for a while and so far no issues. They have some preventative measures built into the screen to combat that. I think one says it shifts the pixels slightly every so often and you don't even notice it. Then it "cleans" itself when you shut down. I made the mistake of wiping the screen down during the cleaning process and it had streaks all over it. Thought I fucked it up, ran the cleaner again and it was good as new. I think this shit will last a long time, but I'm not on it 5-8 hours a day, either.

>>744565119
what you can't afford two screens?

>>744564129
Dolby HDR Theaters have been a thing for a literal decade. The fuck are you even on about

>>744565229
A lot of monitors are shipping out with 4 year burn in guarantee nowadays, and since they obviously don't want to waste money replacing shit for everyone, you can assume they're pretty confident there won't be much, if any, before 4 years.

If you look around, you do see reports of people at 6 or 7 that still don't have any. This really feels like a situation in which the technology is advancing while /v/ is still stuck using the same arguments as 10 years ago. >>744564847
>>744564904

The good part about HDR injection tools like RTX HDR is that i can turn a lot of relatively older games from SDR into HDR and makes a big difference in non supported games. But there's a limit i would say on how far you can go with it. Only later 7th gen games most likely before it starts going past what a lot of developers intended since they were designing their games intentionally in SDR spaces for a while and bending the rules too much goes past the intended presentation.
But it's certainly a game changer for a lot of things. It can transform your experiences of games that you like: even if you hate newer games.

I don't know exactly whether OLED is the factor that changes anything though. I haven't seen the other display tech. And seeing the other display tech on actual HDR supported titles is why i can't comment on how big the differences are. I don't know much about whether the panel type is a big deal on games with good native implementations essentially.

>>744565562
>RTX HDR
Don't you need windows 11 for that?

Does it start burning in after 3 years?

>>744565348
Why the fuck would I want two screens? I don't need some weirdo faggot setup where I can't use my desk for other shit. One big screen >>>>>>> your dumbass smaller games only screen and regular shit screen. I know how alt+tab works, unlike zoomer retards.

On top of that, what kind of nigger do you think I am that none of my games have text in them?

there's a difference but you have to ask yourself if its really worth paying more for such a difference

>>744565375
I initially didn't want an OLED because there was so much talk about burn in and stuff and everybody made it sound like it was a big chore to have one. Kinda think maybe it was a blown a bit out of proportion. I don't have to perform any dark rituals to maintain it. It's just another monitor except it looks better far as I can tell.

>>744565603
I guess so in regards to windows 11.

I just used it for Batman Arkham Asylum recently and it looks great in some of those older games like that. Pretty flexible in a lot of stuff.

>>744565671
For a goon cave of course. NTA but I used my old IPS as a second screen next to my OLED but after seeing no negative effects for 3 years and 14,000 hours I'm going to just replace it with another OLED that I used as a TV. Yeah my IPS has lasted me over 10 years but it's not nearly as nice to use and I can afford a better screen so why the fuck not.

>>744565713
It is

>>744547728
>is it that much of a game changer
Yes. Compared to my old monitor which was a 10yo IPS.
>or at least worth the price?
Depends since OLEDs are like GPUs where the actual part that matters is produced by 2 or 3 companies and there are different generations of matrices which burn out sooner or later anecdotal evidence is that it either will burn out completely in days or will work with no issues for years. I have bought a 27" samsung 3rd gen and have no complaints.

>>744552481
There's no fucking way I'd have any regrets over that shit. I just got a 5070 Ti for $900, would have loved to get it at $750.
I'm just extremely happy I upgraded to 32 GB of RAM like four years ago, just for the fuck of it because it was dirt cheap. Never thought RAM of all things would skyrocket, used to be something you barely even consider in the PC budget.

File: sbj.jpg (26 KB, 296x223)

26 KB JPG

>>744565671

It is but I see no reason to replace my current monitor till it breaks down.

>>744565848
>All desk space is occupied by screens
Fuck that

I have other hobbies and shit. Even with a U shaped desk setup, one table is for model kits, gun cleaning, any other craftwork, and another is for paperwork / other shit / drinks and storage / general use and gun cleaning overflow.

>>744549116
Projectors are such a fucking meme. Always have someone try to get me to play games on a projector and it's always horrendously laggy. You don't need to be a pro gamer to realize that games feel better when they're responsive and your inputs aren't coming out half a second after you press the button

>>744565925
>spend all your money on useless shit when your current shit works great, conspiciously consoom pointlessly always, save nothing, buy the new phone yearly

I'm not a nigger. I'm a human. I want to own a house, and I have other hobbies and things to purchase besides. I also save enough to live for a year in case I lose my job and need to find a new one. Because I'm an ACTUAL person, not a drone or a niggerzombie or whatever kind of cattle you think people should be. Kill yourself.

>>744566145
go stick your guns up your butt lol

>>744565848
I wouldn't want to hang onto a monitor for 10 years. At some point, some new hotness will show up and make me want to upgrade anyway. Right now, seems like the next big thing is cramming AI into monitors, which seems to me like we're about to hit a plateau and the high quality shit that's expensive now will be normal for entry level units, so upgrading/replacing could be cheaper. i had a new $200 IPS monitor that would have probably cost way more 10 years ago and it was perfectly serviceable for gaming in 2025.

>>744547728
>is it that much of a game changer
not really
>worth the price
depends on you
I went for a 37" monitor instead of getting a OLED myself, and it was still cheaper on a sale

File: XG2700-4K_Front_Gaming.jpg (521 KB, 4252x2835)

521 KB JPG

I just bought a 5080, which monitor should I get?

Currently using this 4k Viewsonic IPS screen I bought like a decade ago. Thinking of getting a 1440p oled, but idk which one

>>744566263
>37" monitor
I probably wouldn't use that even if it was gifted to me. It's just way too big for a computer screen.

>>744566187
I feel like we will get the same treatment as TVs, we will all be fighting for the "dumb" monitors while smart monitors flood the market for cheap , the entire LG situation is disgusting
I miss my 4k dumb TV, had to sell it on a emergency and now im looking on pawnshops to get one since I rather just keep the streaming on a box you connect instead of embed on the tv

>>744566329
it's cool for vidya, I can see why you wouldn't like it though, maybe its on the perfect distance for me on my setup, I'll probably get a regular 1080p/1440p monitor for general use later this year

>>744566329
>37 too big
Get a bigger desk, put it farther back, more room in front for other shit. If that's an ultrawide, it's actually smaller than you'd think.

>>744566363
>smart monitors
I'm already mad just from the idea that those will exist. All of the fags behind "smart" tvs deserve a rope.

>>744566052
It's called desk or wall mounts my guy. None of the screens occupy my desk space and they can easily be pushed away.

>>744566363
If they want to have 2 models of the same thing where one has all the crazy AI/Smart stuff and one doesn't, that works. But if everything is going to ship with a bunch of extra crap I don't need or want to use, it's hard to see the point in paying for it. I still have no idea why we need AI in our monitors.

One of the bigger things I've found myself enjoying about my OLED is how there's zero distortion based on what angle you're seeing a part of the screen from, I don't know if the other nu-techs claim that or not too though

>>744566575
>I still have no idea why we need AI in our monitors.
to tell investors "see its used everywhere!"
also collect data on your screen

it slike the 3d fad but on crack, but now backed by governments

>>744566410
>I'll probably get a regular 1080p/1440p monitor for general use later this year
Yeah the idea of having a 1080p say 24 inches monitor for regular usage is pretty appealing. And then a bigger one for gaming.

But as far as regular PC usage goes, 27 is my limit.

>>744554830
>my monitor is going to last 7 years instead of 9
OLED's last about 1 year.

>>744558513
That just explains how big an idiot you are.

>>744564794
You need 960hz to get rid of motion blur. (ie to catch up to plasma/CRT).

>>744564945
based, I remember bumping mine on the desk slightly while getting it on the arm and thinking "yep I fucked it up"

File: banding.png (561 KB, 1200x900)

561 KB PNG

ACK!!!!!!

>>744548540
The early batches of the Tandem Giga/Asus/wahtever models had issues caused by LG, theyve since refined them so theres almost no banding on the 2026 models (from March and beyond) after the first pixel clean (the monitor prompts you on first boot) takes 3 min then you can use it as normal. I have the XG27AQWMG, it has none unless I massively overexpose by increasing shutter length on my phones camera. I run it at 22/100 brightness in SDR and 100 in HDR (brightness adjustable enabled) great monitor so far. Runs pixelclean automatically when in standby or turned off. I have prompts off. Make sure to disable the retarded OUTER dimming setting unless you enjoy a vignette.

>>744568582
>ACK
meanwhile: overexposed photo of a freshly unboxed display from the early batches before LG fixed the issues AND before running the INITIAL pixel clean.

Yep, got my Reddit Gold thanks anon!

>>744568670
>Make sure to disable the retarded OUTER dimming setting unless you enjoy a vignette.
what does this mean

>>744568860
The monitors have settings to prevent burn in. One of those is called Screen Dimming which will dim the screen when static content is displayed for longer times.
The other is called Outer Dimming which dims the sides of the screen, like a vignette, which means the entire screen becomes much dimmer at all times, this one, disable it, never turn it on unless you want everything thtat isnt dead center to be dim as shit. Can keep the various other features enabled like Logo dimming.

a lot of times its not burn in but image retention, I remember seeing someone using that option on the monitor and the "burn in" was gone

>>744565369
And? You're still fake and gay because "Dolby Cinemas" are not available everywhere.

>>744564819
>Let's just add this artificial post processing to a film that wasn't shot for wide color gamut and was never what the director or cinematographer wanted

Ah yes, the I love these blown out reds and neon greens that look normal on SDR.

>>744547996
the hardware unboxed guy has been using an OLED monitor purely for productivity, no gaming, for years and has yet to see any noticeable burn in.

>>744569105
>m-muh rec709 content

>>744547728
Prolly not but they're not that expensive anymore, I got my 65' C5 for 1000 euros

If you dont play retro shit or care about HDR in movies it is prolly not worth it. I played fast paced shit on a VA for years and it was fine

So if I don't want to be worried about burn-in or having to do regular maintenance on a fucking monitor, what are my alternatives for a decent picture?

>>744566105
Its because you're playing on a $50 Chinese no name projector.

>>744569191
>regular maintenance
its a 3 minute process, thats done AUTOMATICALLY when in standby or turned off you retard
>bbut i have to b-browse 4chan 24/7
you can you know have more than one monitor
>burn in
you can you know have more than one monitor, such as your current ips/va, you know, next to the new monitor, thats crazy I understand but, please understand saar

>>744569191
>burn-in
You either immideately have it or it doesn't appear for years

>>744554223
Plasma screens also doubled as a space heater.

>>744569141
Yes, as intended by the filmmakers.

>>744569241
I don't give a shit. I don't want to think about my monitor. It sits below even the speakers in terms of devices I want to think about. "Oh you just have to do this" my current monitors ask nothing of me and I expect future replacement to do the same thing.

>>744569154
>65 foot TV for 1,000 Euros
Damn, Europeans are eating fucking good. Trump was a mistake.

>>744569241
>It turns on when you turn it off!!
>Just get a second monitor!!
Lmao the absolute state of burn in fags.

>>744568358
OLED don't have any motion blur at all. They have stutter.

>>744569313
It was during the final sale before they brought out the C6, but I figured the jump in price wasnt worth because only 77+ are tandem oled

>>744569281
>his only movie content is sdr
lmao lol
>>744569363
how come you indians cant afford a desk large enough to fit two displays?
>>744569363
>it turns on
what turns on? the display is off, the process is automatic, the display is off, I repeat, the display remains off.
>>744569295
so stick with your hand me down TNs for $30

I'm still on 1080p LED monitors from like 15 years ago. They hit 144hz and do everything I want to for the most part. I would like to try out HDR and gsync but I don't think they are worth spending $500 on a lottery with how the hardware is these days.

>>744569397
(Their joke was that ' is feet and " is inches, a 66 foot TV would be gargantuan)

>>744569368
>stutter
lil bro is playing his DOS games still
>>744569413
>gsync
every single fucking monitor from $100 comes with VRR you retard

>>744569295
Well, if it ranks lower than your speakers, don't worry about getting a decent a good one at all. Just keep using whatever you're using and stay locked out of OLED goodness.

mini-LED VA chads stay winning. Best of both worlds
>but muh ghosting
there's no noticeable ghosting at 240Hz

>>744569415
Yea I figured but it's still a great deal

Dunno my touchscreen IPS looks good, the backlight isn't very visible unless you really look for it, my second last IPS monitor was one I bought in 2006 and I used it until 2019, i like stuff that just werks, oleds have a limited lifespan

>>744569447
That I don't want to think about them doesn't mean I want bad quality. It means simply that I don't want to think about them. My monitors serve me, not me them.
But apparently quality and convenience are impossible to get together.

>>744569471
Everyone went on about ghosting but I enjoyed my oddysey G5
>mini-led VA
Prolly what I'll get next. My C5 is nice but I cant game on it for long

I have a SyncMaster from 2009. I like it so much, I bought 2 used ones as spares for when it finally shits the bed.

>>744569471
>miniled
>have to turn off local dimming in desktop/sdr content because algorithm doesnt know what to do properly
>in order to solve the sdr issue (but not desktop issue) you have to run the display in hdr 24/7 where you cannot set your brightness anymore
>still get blooming or inverse blooming
>for desktop content you have to use it like a normal old 2000:1 va monitor
>pixel shimmering due to slow pixel response
>va smear is still a thing in content such as 4chan with Tomorrow theme or twitter dark modes
>terrible viewing angles, even when sat perfectly centered the corners in particular (but also sides) will get washed out, the contrast also shifts depending on your vertical position, leading to either lifted blacks or crushed blacks in a scene
>cant do very small highlights, no a 2% is NOT a small portion of your display, 2% is HUGE.

>>744547728
No they are dogshit unless you live at a cave with zero light leaking to to your room, there is also issue with how dim they are both in SDR and HDR, garbage white color and everything is washed out at normal conditions during the day/night, wiped don't fix anything as you want glossy finish and it will have inferior colors to qdoled anyway, vrr flicker, burn in will always happen and only casuals could say it won't happen, text fringing plus purple tint is still bad unless you buy newest expensive oleds, grey plus vertical banding/raised black levels, automatoc screen dimming when scene is too bright. Sorry but they are garbage experimental products atm maybe in five years they will remove all those issues while I will stick to Miniled ips.

>>744569440
>lil bro is playing his DOS games still
stutter is when content looks noticeably less smooth due to the lack of any natural motion blur from the instant response times of OLED. A 24p movie, or low framerate game, can be a worse experience than LCD without any motion handling like interpolation. I used to be very anti motion smoothing on TVs until I got an OLED.

File: ApplicationFrameHost_yA4V(...).png (29 KB, 1250x390)

29 KB PNG

>>744547728
if i didn't have one, i wouldn't actually bother playing games. at least no games with any level of immersion, i would just play indie pixel slop until i could afford one

File: maxresdefault.jpg (94 KB, 1280x720)

94 KB JPG

>>744547996

>>744569616
>>have to turn off local dimming in desktop/sdr content because algorithm doesnt know what to do properly
no i don't. you must have a shit monitor.
>in order to solve the sdr issue (but not desktop issue) you have to run the display in hdr 24/7 where you cannot set your brightness anymore
win+alt+b bro
>still get blooming or inverse blooming
not that i've seen
>for desktop content you have to use it like a normal old 2000:1 va monitor
and?
>va smear is still a thing in content such as 4chan with Tomorrow theme or twitter dark modes
literally using it right now and see no smearing
>terrible viewing angles
not on my monitor
>cant do very small highlights, no a 2% is NOT a small portion of your display, 2% is HUGE.
i'll live

enjoy your burn in

>>744569648
>400 nits fullscreen white in SDR is dim
I doubt you even run your current IPS/VA monitor at maximum brightness ( they top out at 300-380 nits btw, unless we mean Miniled )
>>744569654
Your TV can literally sync 24, 29, 30, 49/50, 59, 60fps all you need on an LG TV is to enable "Real Cinema", not ot be confused with the true motion shit. Real Cinema just syncs refresh to the content you are viewing.

>>744548598
It's more like buyers remorse thread. They wants us too get fooled and become as miserable as them. Oled may be as well reptilian overlord idea how to generate additional loosh from gaymers by annoying them and making them worry 24/7

File: lcd_vs_oled.jpg (913 KB, 4032x3024)

913 KB JPG

Until either morden CRTs are invented, or MicroLED become affordable and reasonably sized, I'll be sticking to OLED.

>>744569757
>Your TV can literally sync 24, 29, 30, 49/50, 59, 60fps
you're confusing stutter with judder. It genuinely hurts my eyes to watch a movie on my LG G4 without "cinematic movement" turned on. Even that dude from HDTVTest said he recommended using it.

>>744569518
You might be overthinking it. There really isn't much to it. You don't really have to do anything special. On one like I have, it "cleans" the image when you're already shutting down, then it turns itself off shortly after. You'll have settings in the monitor itself for preventing damage, most likely and it's not even complicated at all. If you're already in there tweaking your settings for your picture, it takes just a few extra minutes to go over them and see what's what. Hook it up, do whatever you're doing, turn your PC off, rinse and repeat. There's nothing too intense going on with these things. You can pretty much do your normal thing.

>>744569737
Quit lying, there are literal tutorials here on 4chan on how to get your Miniled, even the very best models btw, to run "properly" with local dimming enabled and thats to run them in HDR 24/7 even at the desktop, but the caveat is you still get INVERSE Blooming or regular BLOOMING around bright things against dark backgrounds.

Also the rest of your shit is obvious cope, because youre a retard with googly eyes.

>enjoy your burn in
My C1 has no burn in despite wow classic being on the display for 8h a day with no burn in mitigations.

>>744569851
Vincent recommends real cinema
Also no one else talks about stutter besides you

>>744569737
why dont you record your amazing lack of blur/smear when scrolling dark content aswell as your AMAZING viewing angles? SAAR? WHATS THAT? YOU WONT REDEEM THE CAMERA?

>>744569105
Am I supposed to care your poor ass doesn't have a Dolby theater near them? I've been going to my local one since 2015. Also doesn't even matter since projected film always had a higher dynamic range than SDR digital so whatever nonsense about nothing being designed for HDR is horseshit. The biggest thing about HDR is getting a clean roll off like film does instead of the hard clamps SDR had. It was a shitty limitation from the very start since film was always better and the first digital projections and digital shot films were always a downgrade.

>>744569281
Filmmakers didn't use REC709 dumbass. They used DCI-P3 with a wider color gamut before HDR/REC2020 hit consumers.

>>744569981
>Vincent recommends real cinema
>Also no one else talks about stutter besides you
not everyone has superhuman eyesight like me. I also can't watch a DLP projector because I can see the rainbow artefacts that none of my friends seemed to notice.

also the cinematic movement setting on the G4 is genuinely really good. I never used the equivalent setting on my old CX because it looked like shit but the one on the G4 looks great.

>>744570189
Not that guy but what should I get for best dolby support on pirated remuxes? ChatGPT is telling me to get a homatics box r plus and to flash coreELEC on it?

>>744568982
i have an OLED with that setting enabled and i never even notice it
what the fuck are you talking about

No just go with micro LED

>>744571218
so turn it on and off retard, i doubt its even the same setting cus ur a retard

>>744571130
That's for DV enhanced layers which I haven't bothered with personally. If I liked Kodi better maybe I'd bother since that's basically what coreELEC is. I think there's more than that box that supports it with coreELEC but yeah if you're looking for the absolute best quality then that's what you'd get. Not all Blu-rays have the enhanced layer either though.

miniled is cheaper with no burn in

File: 1644760952808.png (236 KB, 1024x839)

236 KB PNG

everyone has one, join us in the epic club of screen champions, no downsides or worries, oled now is the perfect technology and mini led can't compete, not even close

>>744565375
braindead shill

>>744569241
kys

File: ack.png (384 KB, 1080x810)

384 KB PNG

20 months of use btw

OLED is only good if you don't play games, i.e dadgamers who relax for 2 hours a week. Of course they won't encounter issues when they barely make use of their monitors

>>744569191
VA mini-led, if you live in EU you're fucked since they're not energy efficient enough to be sold there.

>>744571809
What can be worse than using a 10 year old argument? Oh that's right, not using any at all. Keep going lower.

>>744552481
You can overclock the 5070ti and it'll be right there with the 5080
5080 is the worst 80 card in a long long time

>>744572695
You don't play videogames, shill.

File: image006.jpg (144 KB, 671x617)

144 KB JPG

>>744570189
You're talking about digital filmmaking. I'm talking about real cinema. When home video started guess what gamut they were using? Guess what gamut was the intention of the filmmaker. And guess why when we switched to HD SUDDENLY several transfers had fucked up colors that would eventually be corrected with 4k UHD releases.

>>744570054
Better image/color is from the massive file sizes of movies we have now. Watch 4k rescan put on a Blu-ray and it still looks fucking amazing. HDR is only for shadow and highlight gimmicks. Yes, it's for making sure colors stay colors while fucking up highlights and shadows. But none of that shit was what the original filmmakers cared about. It wasnt their focus. HDR is a digital post processing. It requires the hardware to process extra data besides the film and sound. Its like a third layer of data. That shit is artificial. Yeah there is a High Dynamic Range in physical film, but it was never meant to be used outside of the color correcting process while in post production. Meaning in the cinema it wasn't supposed to be supported and on a broadcast it wasn't supposed to be supported and on a home video it wasn't supposed to be supported. Its like the software trickery of motion smoothing/frame interpolation.

File: oled.jpg (341 KB, 2380x1401)

341 KB JPG

>>744571907
4 years of gaming and desktop. No hiding taskbar or icons or anything weird. Just treated the same as a regular monitor on for 12-16 hours per day.

>>744573812
Anything beyond SRGB is a pure meme.

Since I like motion clarity and crts haven't been made for 20 years oled is the only solution for me.

>>744575013
Monitors with nGreedia pulsar are also a solution.

>>744575076
Pulsar brings additional downsides I do not wish to deal with.

>>744571545
Minileds are nice, but still not as good as oled.
I had a 27inch miniled panel with something like 1100+ dimming zones. It was better than a standard rapid ips panel in terms of local contrast and brightness, but also after trying a 32inch 4k 240hz oled I can't imagine going back to a standard LCD panel anymore.

>>744575282
>Minileds are nice, but still not as good as oled.
begone shill

>>744547963
OLED is a good buy for long periods of gaming, no issues with my Asus one with the lighting or anything

The people claiming OLEDs will burn are the same ones who think Nvidia GPU cables will melt.
It's just poorcope

Gsync pulsar is more important

>>744576001
Let me guess, you don't even know the difference between the 8 pin and 12vhpwr spec?

>>744576125
let me guess. you've never seen a GPU with a 12vhpwr connector in real life

>>744576001
You are a moron. Burn in is literally an inherent nature of the way OLED functions. It will burn in at some point because that's the way physics work in our universe, it all just depends on how you treat the monitor and how much you use/abuse it. If you use it 16 hours every day and you regularly do the same thing(s) over and over, you might start seeing burn in as early as 2 years in.

>>744576185
How long does it take? I'm on 4 years and around 10,000 hours. 2 more weeks right?

I'm not a meme consoomer so oled is worthless to me.

>>744576163
So you don't
You don't mind Nvidia saving pennies on the connector because you worship them

>>744576279
so you've never seen one in real life. lol typical /v/ retard

>>744576249
the burn in is already there
don't kid yourself

>>744576249
>I'm on 4 years and around 10,000 hours. 2 more weeks right
Like I said, it depends entirely on how you use it. But the fact that you're using anecdotal evidence of your own personal experience just shows how fucking mentally handicapped you are.

It's like someone saying "I've never met someone with AIDS, so it must not exist".

>>744576308
>Nvidia has convinced retards to join their cult with no actual logic behind it
Go on, name one thing the cable does better without appealing to faggotry and your corporate worship

The main benefit of OLED is that it absolutely skullfucks competing tech in darker scenes, especially IPS will just lose all near-black detail due to the background glow and night scenes look like crap on them due to that. Doesn’t matter whether we’re talking HDR or not, the difference is massive either way and going back is nearly impossible after seeing how OLED handles those scenes.

Regarding burn-in, it’s a complete non-issue regarding varied TV and gaming use. I had LG OLED from 2016, used it for 7 years almost daily before donating it to my parents due to getting a larger one, and it’s still going strong there with no burn-in. And modern panels should be even more resilient to burn-in. With monitor desktop use, I’d probably be a bit more careful, but I wouldn’t worry a bit about game UIs.

>>744576371
>OLEDs burn in after 2 years, and just because your own personal experience is 4 years without burn in then that doesn't mean I'm wrong
Typical poorfag behaviour.

>>744576424
Just admit you've never seen a GPU with that connector on in real life.

File: got-me.png (32 KB, 1522x110)

32 KB PNG

>>744576436
>Typical poorfag behaviour.
Damn, you got me.

>>744576563
You have a 4090. That's impressive for a seething poorfag

Technology is always getting better every year. There is new models. That's how fast it gets outdated. Do not buy a new monitor unless yours is broken or does not take advantage of your hardware that's it.

>>744576591
You got me. I'm such a poorfag that I got to retire at 36.

>>744576734
>I'm not poor. I have a 4090, yet I act like a $1000 OLED would be a life-changing event, even if it ended up with burn-in.

>>744547728
>buy new monitor
>it installs literal malware in your system
t-thanks

>>744576792
Where did I ever act like that or say anything like that? Are you a schizo or something? You made a claim that OLEDs don't burn in, and I simply corrected you by stating that burn in is inherent to how OLEDs function.

>>744576451
See, I'm expecting some tech literacy from you
You're giving me nothing but corporate worship
What a faggot cultist you are
Why is 12vhpwr better?

>>744576906
I said the same people spreading the end of the world OLED burn in are the same ones spreading the Nvidia cable melting cope. You got triggered. I was correct.

File: Screenshot_3-8-2026_11561(...).jpg (459 KB, 1293x1003)

459 KB JPG

>>744577068
>why is it better
Because you can't buy a powerful GPU without it. I don't care what the fucking connector is. I buy a GPU for its performance.

>>744577119
>say wrong thing
>person corrects you
>heh, you totally got triggered
I can tell that you are both brown and a zoomer.

>>744577227
>Say wrong thing
which was?

>>744576435
Yeah, I have a LG OLED TV from 2019, zero burn-in. I don't think it can happen if you just use it "normally". Don't leave it on the same screen for days, turn off the TV regularly, etc...
Now I'm using a laptop with an OLED screen and I'm being a bit more careful with taskbars and shit. But it's totally worth it.

>>744577182
>I don't care
So you don't know
But you defend it because you worship Nvidia
You don't think for yourself, you suck dick blindly

>>744577250
>people claim OLEDs burn in but It's just poorcope

>>744577361
I said I don't care because I don't care. It could have a 12vhpwr or 4x PCIe cables on. It wouldn't matter. I'm not an autistic poorfag who hyper-focuses on a plastic connector or OLED burn in. I buy products for their performance and replace them if they break

>>744577402
>they last 2 years
which is poorfag cope. even if they did only last 2 years I'd just replace it every 2 years.

>>744577423
>I don't care about the quality, i compensate for my retardation by throwing money at it
Don't tell me that you're an iToddler too??
Trying to squeeze out reason out of you is harder than drawing blood from stone

>>744577480
>which is poorfag cope
It's not. You are just refusing to read and understand what I actually wrote. I literally said that if you play for 16 hours every day and you play the same game, you're going to see burn in. This is literally an undeniable fact.
>even if they did only last 2 years I'd just replace it every 2 years.
Why even bring this up? No one gives a fuck. We are arguing whether burn in happens or not. Your point about cost literally has no validity in this argument, because it doesn't fucking matter to the discussion at hand. You are 100% brown.

>>744577581
>I literally said that if you play for 16 hours every day and you play the same game, you're going to see burn in. This is literally an undeniable fact.
My screen has been on from when I get up to when I go to bed and has done every day since I got it 4 years ago. No burn in.
Your facts are wrong. Poorfag

Even if you consider that OLEDs will feature noticeable burn-in within the first two years, it'll still look better than the out of the box horrid backlighting of an IPS monitor.
You'll need like 5 years+ of burn in to match the horrible quality of an IPS.

>>744577646
>My screen has been on from when I get up to when I go to bed and has done every day since I got it 4 years ago.
So now you are just lying out your ass. Because previously you said you had only used it for 10000 hours in 4 years here >>744576249 which is less than 7 hours per day.

You are a pathetic and retarded brown.

>>744577734
>your screen will break if you use it 16 hours for 2 years
>but having it on for 8 hours for 4 years is doing it wrong so it didn't break
retard

>>744547728
yes and yes

>>744547728
sure if you're okay with getting a new one 3 times a year

>>744577786
>7 hours daily use of varied gaming/desktop use/movies for 4 years
vs
>16 hours daily playing the same game with the exact same pixels in the same places
These are two VASTLY different scenarios that will produce VASTLY different results. The fact that you can't even understand that just shows how incredibly clueless and uneducated you are about OLEDs. You trying to say "BUT IT AVERAGES OUT TO THE SAME THING" just shows you are unironically some 80 IQ brown retard.

>>744577897
>he keeps repeating the same thing over and over, despite having been proven wrong about everything already

There's a stench of the londonjeet in this thread

>>744547728
No. If you have to even consider flushing that amount of money down the toilet for a marginal improvement then don't bother.

>>744568321
telling of how much of a poorfag you are

>If I buy a $1000 OLED and it gets burn in after 3 years how will my finances ever recover?

File: Screenshot 2025-01-29 233730.png (2.53 MB, 2298x1751)

2.53 MB PNG

>12vhpwr
no way fag

File: 1708735535774213.gif (3.07 MB, 236x498)

3.07 MB GIF

>240hz OLED
>playing at 4K 100fps with VRR
>retarded amount of flicker
>still flickers locking the framerate because the VRR keeps freaking out and jumping up and down in game even though the fps is stable
>but not in the menus because???
>lock game at 100fps and lock monitor at 100hz with VRR still on
>no more flicker
explain this
am I a genius or a retard for fixing it this way

>>744578589
It's called a variable refresh rate
When you cap it to 100 it's no longer variable

I only get flicker on loading screens

>>744578648
but I still have VRR on at 100hz and it doesn't flicker
if I set it to 120hz with VRR and the game locked to 100fps it flickers again but not as bad as at 240hz
why doesn't the monitor just match the fps of the game when the game isn't wildly jumping in framerate
why does it work that way in menus but not in gameplay
what is the downside of setting a higher hz monitor to lower hz
what about the oled anti flicker setting the monitor has
I don't want to use it because I read it adds extra processing
also I tried it and at medium it still flickered and at high it disabled vrr completely

>>744547728
I do office work so no, I need BRIGHTNESS during the day

oleds don't get bright enough for modern SDR content. Modern SDR content is intended to be viewed at 400-500 nits and oled screens basically can't do that fullscreen.

>>744578905
SDR at 500 nits sounds fucking painful at monitor distances, sounds more like something you’d want from a TV in an extremely bright environment.

File: oled superiority.jpg (583 KB, 4032x3024)

583 KB JPG

>>744569810
>i-i-it doesn't l-look that bad in real life, you sh-shill!!!
>just use bias lighting!!!

>>744578905
why the fuck would you ever have a monitor that bright

>>744578589
When will retards realize you literally do not need VRR at high refresh rates?
My 360hz OLED has ZERO gamma flickering or tearing with VRR disabled. It's just not noticeable! hahaha! OLED gods stay winning

>>744579021
>why would you ever want to view content as it was intended?
gee i dunno there chief

>>744579101
You're lying. SDR is 100 nit standard.

File: IMG20250719121232.jpg (2.28 MB, 4608x2592)

2.28 MB JPG

As a doom 3 enjoyer oled is the only option for me.

OLED technology is for entertainment, and PC monitors are essentially tools.
These days, TVs absolutely have to be OLED. PC monitors don't.

>>744579360
Wrong.

>he doesnt own a 100k microLED display
lmao, imagine being poor

>shit for text and regular desktop usage

I'd get one for vidya and movies but I have more of an ergonomic autistic concern. I want my primary monitor be in front of me, and I want my primary monitor to be able to do all kinds of tasks. So the oled one would have to be secondary and I don't want to turn my head to game on my secondary one. Maybe the solution is to mount them on arms and move them around.

>>744547728
I am considering one for retro games and emulators with crt-royale.

They don't make 1080p oled screens so it is a meme technology.

mini-led plaps oled

>>744579512
Forgot to mention that I am cognizant of the fact that 4K OLEDs don't suffer from shit text but I can't run everything in 4k with my 5070 Ti.

>>744579512
theres nothing worse about using OLED for regular PC use. stop being retarded and autistic.

>>744579591
There are, but they are shitty little portable 60hz monitors, which is what poorfags like you deserve. Dance around the little tablet for me, jester!

>>744579431
>wrong
I use my monitors 18 hours a day. One of them is running practically the same program the whole time. No one in the entire world would recommend an OLED monitor for what I do. Replacing my monitors (which I use for "industrial" purposes), with an OLED screen just because it produces prettier images (relating almost exclusively to contrast) makes as much sense as a factory worker setting aside his safety boots to wear high heels while working, like a gay transvestite.
If this applies to me, it also applies to everyone who uses their monitors for purposes other than pure entertainment.
PC monitors have other functions besides making Netflix shows look better.

File: muh exposure muhfucka.jpg (106 KB, 960x1280)

106 KB JPG

>>744579660
>mini-led plaps oled

>>744579793
this is a gaming board you fucking tool

>>744579707
Are you telling me that sub-4K OLEDs having subpixel layouts that make text look like ass was all lies?

>>744579793
I didn't ask, I didn't read, you're still wrong.

>>744579837
>Uh... since this board is for gaming, this effectively means that all monitors will be used exclusively for gaming
This is the IQ of consumers who can't resist paying more for technology that's less suitable, durable, and useful for them.

>>744579828
bought a shit one with a low amount of dimming zones just like OLEDtards talk about HDR despite their screens not having anywhere near the nits for it
a good mini led has blooming you can only notice through a camera lens

>>744579892
>Ahhh! Stop using common sense! Just buy the most expensive tech to end up with a less useful tool! Ahhh!
The mindset of industry shills is feminine.

>>744579828
>when you crank the exposure on your camera to give misleading pictures

>>744579917
>Discussing OLEDs on gaming board
>"bbbbut my niche use for work"
stupid fucker

>>744579858
yeah I can tell you for a fact that text looks exactly the fucking same on my OLED and IPS you fucking sperg

as a young thirdworlder poorfag i used lack of vidya hardware as a big incentive to study myself out of misery. would recommend

>>744579917
>I WANT to use the shittier tech because I am so intelligent and above it all
glad Im not a poorfag

>>744579932
>mini led
>not micro led
lol

>my job doesn't pay me enough to buy OLED
ha ha

>>744547728
It's a difficult topic. I have a 45" ultra wide oled from LG since mid 2023 over 10k hours of use.
It look nice but most games don't take oled into consideration while making the games. Some stuff supposed to be black are not, it's sometimes too dark or not dark enough.
Most oled displays are not made to display text, you need to run clear type and the result is not perfect.
Oled anxiety is a thing you have it or not. If you have it don't get one it will be suffering.
Also those monitors are higher maintenance compared to a regular monitor, you can't unplug them out of the blue, some have fans built in.
LG is currently rolling out bloat ware through windows update...

Overall I would say if you use your computer a lot (over 30h a week), have the cash for it, go for it. It shouldn't be a purchase that bleeds you, you are getting something with a shorter lifespan and still in the early adoption.

I'd rather ask /g/ for dating advice than ask /v/ to understand any of the technology it uses.

File: low apl.jpg (809 KB, 4025x1519)

809 KB JPG

>>744579932
I literally have a 1152 zone miniLED sitting right next to a QD OLED. I know the strengths and weaknesses of both technologies far better than you, because you have a double digit IQ and I have a triple digit IQ. MiniLED blooms, it doesn't matter what zone count or what native contrast the LCD layer has.
>muh full white nits
Actual idiot.

>>744580026
This OLED shortcoming seems to be pretty common knowledge but sure, I'll believe some clearly bad faith fucker on a tibetian throat singing board whose entire argument is "trust me bro"

>>744579978
Filename retroactively refuted you. You didn't even check the filename, you drooler! LMFAO! so fucking easy. this is the intellect and power of LCD poorfags? No wonder you're in poverty.

File: lmao.png (63 KB, 498x271)

63 KB PNG

>>744580210
i have 1800 dimming zones and its perfect im sorry you were not informed and picked a poor choice
i have an oled and mini led tv as well as an ultrawide oled monitor and i pick the mini everytime

>>744578905
They do
You're supposed to sit in a dim room with an adequately lit screen, that brings out the contrast and takes advantage of improved photosensitivity

>>744580301
I also have a 2304 zone 4k miniLED in my office, sorry, poorfag.

everyone keeps calling mini-led shit when Sony, who have consistently made the best TVs, have ditched OLED in favour of it this year.

>>744580396
The average TV buyer is a mindless retard who can't tell the difference anyway. Goes doubly so for "people" who buy overpriced trash like Sony TVs.

>>744580396
TVs are made for goycattle and mini led lets them cut costs
The average normalfag turns a 4k screen into a 720p screen with their viewing distance

>>744580396
Yup - sony makes the best in what field they compete in which is why they ditched physical media for their games console. They ARE the best after all.

File: 1756679029822680.png (867 KB, 1600x1062)

867 KB PNG

Thoughts on LG OLED TV?

File: Screenshot 2025-12-17 123435.png (118 KB, 1055x1754)

118 KB PNG

>>744580447
>hurr durr just glue your face to the screen

>>744580438
>>744580447
get a new script

Although I have never owned an OLED television and currently cannot afford one, I consider myself knowledgeable on the subject due to having watched a YouTube video seven years ago in which a logo became permanently burned into the screen.

>>744580481
I have the G4 and it's incredible. Their software is getting some bad press right now for popup ads but its still the best TV OS out there. Anything else (especially android, firetv, and roku) is utter shit to navigate and usually doesn't give you enough control.

>>744580481
Since the last update they are literal spyware sending screenshots of what you have on screen every few minutes

>>744580638
What are the TVs like as a monitor?
I assume they don't have the auto power on with the PC, but do you need to change channels or anything each time you turn it on?

>>744580662
oh yeah heard about that, shame, was thinking of buying one

>>744580662
>>744580717
Turn off ACR and it stops

>>744580531
>you're going off a script
your argument was appealing to authority, faggot

>>744580517
Your eye can perceive 60 pixels per degree
5400 pixels covering your central 90 degrees, 2700 pixels covering your central 45 degrees
Any more than that and you're wasting the screen

>>744547728
>is it that much of a game changer
yes
>worth the price
no

you have to be really rich to spend $800 on a piece of gear

>>744580841
>$800
?
https://www.newegg.com/gigabyte-go27q24a-27-qd-oled-240-hz-qd-oled/p/N82E16824012118?Item=N82E16824012118
https://www.costco.com/p/-/acer-265-predator-x27u-oled-wqhd-240hz-gaming-monitor/4201005878?langId=-1
>nooo i need muh 4k maymay
https://www.bestbuy.com/product/msi-mag-321upxb-qd-oled-g-sync-compatible-32-qd-oled-uhd-240hz-0-03ms-gaming-monitor-with-display-hdr-tb400-dp-hdmi-usb-black/J3P7TXTKPR/sku/6677818?extStoreId=125
>ACK!
Tranny status: dilated.

OLED is better, but by like 20%. 30% if you have a shit LCD panel.

I really don't like the idea that OLEDs are by the very nature of their underlying technology going to be obsolescent. I still have some older screens lying around that I use as secondary monitors or for specific environments where I happened to need a screen in a location that I didn't initially expect, even if it's just temporarily. Those screens still work fine even if they're old as fuck. With an OLED I can never count on that. It's going to be e-waste at some point and then I have to get a new one.

>>744580662
so some LG jeet has to sift through pages upon pages of my goon stash?
oh well

>>744581303
Sure, there's going to be better monitor tech eventually
But you're taking about spending more than a decade of your life looking at a shittier screen