If I have a 5070Ti and 9850X3D should I game with a 27.5 inch monitor at 1440p with native resolution, or a 32 inch monitor at 4k with balanced DLSS?
>>744582686You're meant to look at FPS benchmarks berore you buy a monitor. Do you even have a game in mind that you're going to play?
>>744582686I have 9070xt and it can reach 4k at 60fps on Quality FSR on UE5 slop. On AC6 it reached 60 without any upscale.
>>744583047>Do you even have a game in mind that you're going to play?Pretty much everything from UR5 slop like Stellar Blade, to emulating pokemon games. I really don't feel like swapping monitors depending on the game.
27" 4K
>>744583320Right, well, I have this link for you to look at.https://lanoc.org/review/video-cards/asus-prime-rtx-5070-ti?start=5If you look at Metro Exodus, it's 103 FPS at 4k, and 157 at 1440p. So, you deciding between the two resolutions is just a matter of whether you want that extra FPS. Based on the games you named, I'm guessing not, and you should probably just play at 4k.pI don't even know what 4k looks like, because I play at 1440p/100fps.
>>744583626Honestly, I'd like to sit at at least 120 FPS even in cinematic AAA titles. But know that's not happening at 4k without lowering the settings a bit.I'm just curious what looks better. Native 1440p, or 4k DLSS.
>>744583929I'm pretty sure I played Borderlands 4 with DLSS on, because it's unplayable without it, and the game still looked really nice. The only noticeable change is that the game runs at a reasonable FPS. I don't think you should be afraid of it.
>>7445826864k with DLSS will look better but forget high frame rates when everything is Unreal Slop 5.
>>74458268627" 1080p@240hz and you get 10 years more out of you gpu by seeing 10% less pixels
