I started game not knowing much about WH40k, naturally like in other rpgs wanted be the good guy(Iconoclast) who helps others, dogmatic seemed way too brutal and ruthless, plebs life means nothing. By the time i got to act 2 and started to know the world better i want to pick Dogmatic dialogue options more and more, in the context of that universe where heresy can lead to Archenemy and unimaginable suffering it just seems more reasonable for both parties to not take any risks, often fast death is a lot better than the alternative. On the offtopic its just scifi and not where we are heading, no way rich group of oligarch who live like kings will have absolute power over you in the future, right guys?I started the game knowing almost nothing about WH40K. Naturally, like in most RPGs I wanted to be the good guy and picked the Iconoclast path to help people. Dogmatic seemed way too brutal and ruthless, the lives of ordinary people meant nothing.By the time I reached Act 2 and started to understand the setting better, I found myself agreeing with Dogmatic dialogue options more and more. In a universe where even a small act of heresy can lead to Chaos corruption and unimaginable suffering, refusing to take risks starts to seem like the more reasonable choice. In many cases a quick death is far better than the alternative.BTW it's just sci-fi and definitely not where we're heading, right? There's no way a tiny group of ultra-rich oligarchs will end up living like kings while holding absolute power over everyone else. Right, guys?
