Is there any reason to build as cheap/efficient as possible or is it just for leaderboard e-peen?
Idk.
>>744599583If you don't feel intrinsic satisfaction from making your designs more compact and efficient then you're gay and/or a woman
>>744600940spacechem already conditioned me to be as frugal as possible with designs but it just feels like I'm missing out on cooler designs when I just have one arm doing everything without an explicit invective to do so.
Just make it work.