/v/ - >10 years since release Was it really worth it? In - Video Games

Anonymous

08/03/26(Mon)17:00:36 No.744608949

File: 45747457.png (439 KB, 829x553)

Anonymous 08/03/26(Mon)17:00:36 No.744608949 Archived

>10 years since release
Was it really worth it? In a world of multicore processors I'd say it's a pretty good alterative to Microsoft's bullshit API dx12 when it comes to porting to Linux and all the work emulators have gotten done switching over from OpenGL to play all are old games. I can think of maybe 6-10 steam released games iv played that use it well meanwhile dx12 games get releases out the ass, it isn't fair.

Anonymous
08/03/26(Mon)17:35:41 No.744610941

Anonymous 08/03/26(Mon)17:35:41 No.744610941

Why did they make the mascot hot?

Anonymous
08/03/26(Mon)17:39:19 No.744611149

Anonymous 08/03/26(Mon)17:39:19 No.744611149

give it time
valve's work on arm is going to heavily incentivise using it over dx12
might even convince consoles and apple too

Anonymous
08/03/26(Mon)17:53:50 No.744611998

Anonymous 08/03/26(Mon)17:53:50 No.744611998

Every game on steam machine is running on Vulkan

Anonymous
08/03/26(Mon)17:57:50 No.744612236

Anonymous 08/03/26(Mon)17:57:50 No.744612236

>>744608949
>Was it really worth it?
Yes? It's a universal thing and the only other graphics API Linux had was OpenGL. The active development it receives is great.

Anonymous
08/03/26(Mon)17:59:18 No.744612331

Anonymous 08/03/26(Mon)17:59:18 No.744612331

can you explain how vulkan is better than opengl to a fellow brainlet? im still confused on exactly why its better

Anonymous
08/03/26(Mon)18:30:40 No.744614136

Anonymous 08/03/26(Mon)18:30:40 No.744614136

>>744612331
OpenGL is ancient and has basically nonexistent multicore CPU utilisation