https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IQrXrJoooWISimilar to hunger, a desire for knowledge and information exists in people. Everyone supposedly knows that if you don't acquire good information, you'll be tricked or confused, and you stand to lose a lot in the end. And yet.No one tries to gather information with their own hands. They go to a free information site they like, consult their influencers of choice on social media, or maybe a newspaper, and think they've gathered all the information the world has to offer.When people know that someone of unknown origins has prepared their food, they become unsettled and refuse to eat. But when it comes to information, they accept it blindly and believe it, without thinking about who might have tampered with it.As a result of heightening concerns about food safety, people are checking the calorie count, as well as data regarding pesticides, production sites, and producers of their food in detail. So, how does this compare to how they check their information?How many people actually do check the composition, ingredients, production sites, and producers that make up the information they're given? Articles are always presented as impartial and middle of the road, written to seem politically neutral, and the information sources that are their ingredients are often military officials or interested parties who may not even exist. There are even tons of articles where the producer, aka the journalist who wrote it, is unnamed.And yet, people gobble them up.
>>744641407sounds like Hideo Kojima political theory
phase 2? neveryttd part 3-2? also neveryou lived long enough for silksong to come out before ciconia and your turn to die btw
ok frogposter
I just ate like two pounds of cherries. My stool is going to be so loose.
>>744641407childish
