[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/v/ - Video Games


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: hq720.jpg (65 KB, 686x386)
65 KB JPG
is it good now? why aren't there more FPS games adapting the BF formula?
>>
Jackfrags told me it's good, and since I downloaded his opinion, I also believe that. And now I spread that opinion here. Yes, it's good.

And to answer your question, there are already plenty of games adapting the formula, even COD is experimenting with taking over certain elements but it turns out there's a little more nuance to it and just slapping vehicles on a large map is not enough to make it fun.
>>
Mortars got nerfed again and they already sucked
>>
>>744652580
which games? Wardogs is coming on EA soon and Delta Force has a BF mode but it's apparently full of chinks only
>>
File: Shan.png (669 KB, 647x922)
669 KB PNG
>>744652197
No and it never will. It feels really good to know that I didn't spent money on this piece of garbage. Also, whoever is charge of making the skins and for some reason obsessed with tape and faggot ass capes and hoods should FUCKIN DIE!
>>
Probably not. I don't think there is such a thing as a good multiplayer experience. Including this website.
>>
>BF after 4
>Good
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
>>
>>744652197
>Is it good
It's ok. Moderation is shit. Sitting on a 3 day ban for a name that apparently offended some pussy's delicate sensibilities while not being remote racial at all.
>>
>>744652197
it will never be good, they can add old maps/guns, the core is shit
you get cheating chinks with high pings every game
>>
>>744656075
you can just type troon instead of pussy or whatever
they don't ban for it
>>
File: 1783785894984616.jpg (28 KB, 558x550)
28 KB JPG
>>744656439
>Can tell trannies to 41% and no punishment
>Be named Johnny Hotcock and get labeled an enemy of the state and banned
I'm glad the Saudis acquired EA so they can fire and subjugate whatever retarded bitch made this decision.
>>
should I reinstall bf6 or cod warzone
>>
File: 1756647476462136.png (565 KB, 831x608)
565 KB PNG
Update real soon, right, fellas?
>>
this game is only good if want to make airfaggots mad
>>
It's still pretty shit.
Dice is a shit developer. They're like Bethesda where they're incompetent and lazy but it doesn't matter since nobody else makes games like them so there's no alternative. And because of that they'll never stop being a shit developer.
>>
>bf1 was awesome
>bf5 was an ugly asset flip
>2042 was a mistake
>ea: we need safe easy money NOW
>tell devs to create a bf3 remake
>hire ex cod dev as director
>zero innovation, just keep it safe, we NEED the money

still waiting for bad company 3 cold war
>>
>>744656795
wasn't this a surprise hit? why the FUCK would they abandon it then?
>>
>>744657217
they didn't abandon it, they sabotaged it
people loved the arcade gameplay and proximity chat but the devs tried to make the gameplay more hardcore and cut back on the chat functions
they removed the fun and people left
>>
>>744652197
Because BF adopted the COD formula ever since Battlefield 3.
>>
>>744652824
>It feels really good to know that I didn't spent money on this piece of garbage

This sounds a lot like cope
>>
No.
>>744652769
Got my code. Ready for Friday.
>>
>>744652197
despite the recent marketing push claiming "battlefield is finally good!!! (this time for real guys" it is probably in the worst state it has been in yet. The recent changes to the gunplay have made the game even more miserable to play and the new map is underwhelming.
>>
File: druk.jpg (214 KB, 800x1200)
214 KB JPG
i hope wardogs will be a success
>>
>>744658424
>The recent changes to the gunplay
QRD? Stuff feels the same to me.
>>
>>744659140
Arm (and leg, but whatever) shots do less damage than body shots now. Since guns have random horizontal recoil this means you'll very frequently get in situations where your gun jerks in one direction so you get the damage penalty and leave enemies with 1hp.
The developers are extremely stupid and keep making problems for themselves. Previous games used stacking inaccuracy during full auto to slow down kills at longer ranges, but for 6 they guns super accurate because that's how they are in Call of Duty and we want Call of Duty players to like our game so we'll do that too. But that meant everyone was getting instant killed from 50m away which feels awful, so the devs introduced really strong random recoil to make hitting at longer ranges impossible. But that also felt bad, so they reverted that and introduced the penalty for hitting arms, except that feels bad too.
It's just embarrassing. They've been trying to become the new CoD for nearly two decades now and it doesn't work, but they never stop trying. And all they do is make their game worse.
>>
>>744652197
no
>>
>>744652197
>Multiplayer is just COD with slightly larger maps
>Campaign is literally AI generated
>Went all in on a BR mode absolutely no one asked for
>Made fun of COD for retarded skins
>First update was a bunch of retarded skins
>Zero good maps
>>
>>744657217
>>744657768
they've been working on a major update for the past 2 years
>>
>People lose their shit over female soldiers in WW2
>Nobody bats an eye at endless female soldiers on the front lines in a modern conflict

What gives?
>>
>>744652197
Who's the cute chingchong boy in the back?
>>
>>744663647
>Nobody bats an eye
What? It was complained about endlessly when it was released.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.