When you see fingerprints of feminism and "ethics" departments in the form of censorship, that should not simply be seen as just dissapointing or against your principles, instead you should talk about it as if its a defective product that doesnt even work, the exact same as a program that just blue screens your pc when you launch it. If there are censor spats, if there are black voids under skirts, if the character dissapears from existence when you bring the camera low, if the company admits that they have an "ethics department" or work with "consulting firms", you have been sold a product that is deliberately defective and you are entitled to a refund at the very least. Don't let anyone try to change the subject to random, irrelivant bullshit to distract you.>they heckin got you fighting le culture war to distract from le heckin class warDont care, I was sold a defective product, it doesnt work, if the panties are censored the product is defective.>omg have sex incelDont care, I was sold a defective product, it doesnt work, if the panties are censored the product is defective.>go watch le heckin pornDont care, I was sold a defective product, it doesnt work, if the panties are censored the product is defective.>its such a heckin small detail, it literally doesnt matterDont care, I was sold a defective product, it doesnt work, if the panties are censored the product is defective.>well IM still gonna buy itDont care, I was sold a defective product, it doesnt work, if the panties are censored the product is defective.I could go on but you get the point.
look at all the words
Why do you even care
>>744653732They will just gaslight you and say it never happened.
>>744653894Its wrong to sell defective, non working products. Its illegal too, false advertising.
>>744653846Dont care, I was sold a defective product, it doesnt work, if the panties are censored the product is defective.
>>744654101it isn't defective if that is what they intended, it is working as intended. it might not be what some customers want the product to be, but the producers have the right to put out any product they want. i'm not defending covering upskirts in black boxes, but i would defend a companies right to make the product they decide on. no one forces the consumer to purchase it. a company has the right to destroy a franchise if it wants to & thinks this will increase shareholder value. it is literally freedom to censor yourself. a dumb use of freedom but it is freedom.
>>744653732Even without this testimony, it was expected that the "ethics" department nerfed the potential of this game and many others. Simply don't buy from Square Enix and warn everyone in your community about the censorship. If they shill their games in any way, kick them out of your community.
>>744654529Wrong. If I see fingerprints of feminism on the game, its defective, same thing as my computer blue screening or console breaking when the "game" launches
This thread was moved to >>>/pol/540177498
