Nowadays, if someone is into lolis in videogames, people universally agree that they would molest children IRL. So, by transitive property, if someone is into shooting people in videogames, would they not also be into shooting people IRL, as well? How do people believe the former, but not the latter?
>>744705268*farts loudly* oops sorry guys! (i walk off looking embarassed, theres shit chunks visible on my pants)
jack thompson was only right insofar as he was proof that moral majoritarian fuckers exist everywhere and the right is not your friend
>>744705268all living things kill things to stay alive, it's normal. Molesting kids is not.
>>744705268Shooting people is an objective in the game that the player is required to complete. No game requires you to be sexually attracted to children, that's entirely on you.
>>744705268>Nowadays, if someone is into lolis in videogames, people universally agree that they would molest children IRLhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weasel_word
>>744705716What about Japanese dating sims, specifically ones that take place in a high school?
>>744705268He was right but the problem is that he's a dishonest politician who just chose a stupid hill to grift on. He got his bribe and fucked off
