Is it true that /v/ideogames peaked in 2012?Maybe the Mayans were right. The world really ended after that.
>>744719754>Halo 4It is mostly true, though. Technical leaps and the talent/innovation was still there. 2014 was such a disappointing year, you could feel the death spiral already happening.
2012 had some good games, but the real peak will always be 98. 04 is good too
>>744719754Video games peaked at whatever year an anon's PC can run games.
>>744719754>is it true that video games peaked during whatever year was the peak of my adolescence?No.95% of that image is pure, putrid dogshit with the other 5% being somewhat OK.
the 90's is when vidya started getting good, the 2000s are the golden age. The 2010's had a few gems but overall a serious decline in quality. 2020's is mostly trash
>>744719754You don't even have GotY on there Anon
>>744719754In no way does that image show 'peak'. There's like 2 good games on it.
>>744720614>>is it true that video games peaked during whatever year was the peak of my adolescenceBut then you'll go and say games peaked in 1996 or some shit because that was your adolescence
>>744719754The world did end. There is zero explanation for everything to be this retarded without correction or even consequences.
>>744720816I was born in 94. The pure, utter dogshit that marked one of the lowest points in the entire medium's history was part of my adolescence.
Excellent bait image
>>7447197542011 was the biggest year in gaming, with AAA bomb dropping after AAA bomband the year floodgates were opened
>>744719754>Is it true that /v/ideogames peaked in 2012?No. At that point, vidya was already deep in the cancer-gen decline.1998 will forever we be absolute pinnacle of video games. 2005 was the swan song of the Golden Era.
