"Boomer shooters" are fucking stupid.
>>744744936yes
Why are they stupid
>>744744936They didn't actually have shooters in the 1950s.
>>744745758he likes militaryslop to larp as delta force capturing maduro
>>744745758>Why are they stupidLarping technical limitations from 20 years ago strikes me as dumb. The gameplay isn't necessarily the problem, it's often the presentation. It's neat for a minute, but gets old after an hour.
>muh graphxit's the retard hour I guess
>>744746402bruv this was peak back then https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-zytzGyYr2g&list=PLJhtkwdMkfOjJ17OB5G2c4NYigtdyhcKS
>>744744936nah you are
>>744744936They can be fun, but often the newer releases aiming to fit into this subgenre feel almost identical to one another - an issue exacerbated by just how oversaturated the video game market has been with these shooters in recent years.
>>744744936dusk is a boring game even if you like boomer shooters