Is it really that much bigger??
Nope
Yes
>>745753828It's just flatter so you see longer
I don't see this game even being fun if the map is that big. They'll add fast travel for sure. I know other rockstar games have taxis and stuff but now it's going to feel required and you probably need to fast travel every 20 minutes
those clouds look like shit
You can see skyscrapers off in the distance in 6 that are the same distance as LS is from Mt Chilliad in 5
>>745753828the whole map in 1 clip
>>745753828vibe coded by 1 indian in a day
How could the pc build be fully playable like that and still be 2y+ away from release?
>>745754519I guess they make it on PC first and then compile it to work on consoles later
>>745754131the build is 8 years old please understand R* will fix it
>>745753828Map size doesn't mean jack shit, otherwise Fuel would be a fondly remembered masterpiece and not a forgotten tech demo
>>745754594so the pc version delay is entirely artificial?
>>745754131they went for the ultrarelism volumetric cloud meme, so instead of clouds that actually blanket the sky you get highly realistic clouds that are unrealistically scattered across the sky at low altitude
>>745753828the plane sure goes a lot faster
>>745754519it’s not a PC build, anyone that says it is is blowing smoke up your ass. The guy is is clearly using a stick when he aims his gun in another clip and all these clips have HDR on for no reason and only consoles with HDR tvs connect turn that shit on automatically
>>745754519Dev build needs to work on developement PC. PC release needs to work as many PC configurations as possible.
>>745754721did anyone claim it wasn't? Rockstar always double dips
>>745753828“big” only means something if it isnt boring as fuck. alot of building and foliage in this clip but if 95% is just set design you cant have any meaningful interaction with then it might as well be just empty space that’s gonna be a slog to traverse. RDR2 had a slightly smaller map and even smaller hubs than GTA5 but it felt a lot bigger in scale and in things to do. Bare minimum expectation should be doubling that density, anything less is a failure considering how much money and time they spent on this game
>>745754734You can have volumetric clouds coupled with high altitude texture cloudsBut yes volumetric clouds have a lot of issues, with distant rendering, reacting to light, different weathers etc.
>bigger = better memegta is trash
It's over
>>745754721Not entirely, but they definitely could have developed on the side with budget like that, and then release it maybe a month or two later.
>>745754787He just has a controller hooked up to his pc
>>745755002one man can save us
>>745753828It looks bigger, denser and more detailed than gtav and if you disagree you are likely medically retarded
>>7457538285090 to get 60 fps
>>745754861>>745754647>>745754936even if it really was totally empty, I'd still like it because the scale of everything is so much larger and more realistic. Those skyscrapers are actually huge; they look puny in GTAVAlso they've shown themselves capable of adding tons of interiors in GTAV. They could add a lobby to every building with their budget
THIS IS A /V/SASICK OF SHITTY SHILL THREADS? WANNA TALK ABOUT GAMES YOU LOVE?USE THE FILTERS!Filter out these terms and watch the board quality IMPROVE! (Put an asterisk after each term to filter out all uses of the term.)GTAGrand Theft AutoRockstarRocksaarTake-TwoT2IndiaRed Dead RedemptionSan AndreasleakBIGGER =/= BETTER
>>745755008this is why I added on the hdr point at least read the full post before replying
>BIGGER =/= BETTERif it was smaller you'd sure as fuck say it was worse
>>745754178>>745755281yeah thats pretty crazy. It's weird because the buildings in V felt huge too, but compared to this they look tiny
>>745753828It just looks bigger, it's really only like 1.2x larger
GTA 5 is made for 7th gen consoles' shitty hardware. (256 MB ram lol)
>>745759098GTA 6 is made to run on Xbox Series S
>>745753828This is enormous. The one thing I'm actually impressed by from the leaks
>>745755002if this keeps going good members of our society should refuse playing it
It has to be bigger with flying. RDR2 map is actually really small because you can’t fly, it’s just so detailed it seems big from the ground. https://youtu.be/JNNHgSNsUTg
>>745753828I never noticed how small of scale the city in V is. The skyscrapers are like 1/3 of the size of the GTAVI ones. Its not just size, its scale that's been largely increased
The plane footage completely buck broke /v/ haters lmao
>>745753828Sure but if you have a brain you understand that there will be nothing to do in it.
>>745760705they could've added hundreds of interiors with their time, budget and manpower
>>745753828When he flies closer to the ground the city looks completely indistinguishable from Los Santos.
Holy fuck lol
>>745754787>guy is is clearly using a stick when he aims his gunjeets don't game EVER so i fully believe that could have been a mouse
>>745754721They still control the QA and dev rigs. 2 year delay is definitely artificial but there's still testing various setups.
>>745754060Miami do be flat tho
>>745760939Oh I'm a fucking moron and missed the text that literally said it was GTAV, lmao.
>>745760882Are the leaks over? It would be nice if they showed off any of that stuff if there's any I guess.
So is the consensus that this guy has an older content complete build in the final stages of bug fixing/UI changes? Maybe a year old?
>>745761154no. The guy just shoots some hoops in the driveway, goes on 3 killing sprees and flies a plane
>>745753828Los santos is a bit larger then all of the grey areas in the VC map put together.
>>745754721Yes, it's an agreement they have with sony. People will buy ps5s to play it early, then buy it full price to play it 60 fps after it's full release.
>>745760069You lose karma for killing police and civilians in the leaks ;)
>>745762315No it's not...
>>745762609>actual repercussions for rampaging >way better crime systemI know. I am so excited
>>745762315Also the map of 5 is not to scale with 6. Should be like 50% smaller.
vice city looks enormous compared to los santos, but it does kind of look like mount kalaga is right there with little or nothing in between, and the everglades seen at the start of the plane leak looks super small and uninteresting
>>745762315>the leeker just happens to fly close enough to the ground to make the map appear as large as possible when it's actually smaller than Vvery organic
>>745753828That looks insanely good. Is this the whole clip?
>>745762487Are you sure there was an agreement? They double dip every time. They know the PC players will buy it twice. And it's on xbox too. The cheapest way to play it would be Xbox Series S,
>>745763813its 1.6-1.7x the size of 5, per Saukko the guy who leads the mapping project. This is based on the maps measured in the rage engine units of measurement.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-HURbPUxaj0The part where he analyses length of travel from points A to B is more interesting. The map emphasizes travel distance more like san andreas than gta V with the giant ring road highway that killed all other travel options and let you go max speed around the whole map.
>>745754095Faggot. One of the many problems in all GTA games has been the tiny map. It never feels like a real world.
>>745762315You have no understanding of scale.The roads in V are much bigger and thicker than the map in VI, which means the Los Santos map is vastly exaggerated in size
>>745753828This video is misleading. GTAVI's map is actually smaller than V and has less in it
>>745764987You have no sense of scale
>>745764987>don't trust your lyin' eyes!
>>745754721of course> sell game on console> sell same game again on PC years latera lot of PC gamers will pay twice for the game. If they released for PC on day 1, they would never buy it twice.
Look at the distance between highway junctions in GTA5 vs GTA6. In 5 only one can even fit inside the city (widthwise)
>>745765510people that say it's the same shit are retarded, the density in GTA 6 is an order of magnitude higher.Just look at the amount of roads, trees and boats.
>>745765671Also a lot of the green area in GTA6 seems to be populated vs GTA5 where it's just barren mountains
>>745753828it's impressive, was expecting worseso still buying
>>745761401the build is at most 17 months old based on the release date of one of the tracks. I dont think theres any reason to believe its necessarily in the further end, it could easily be a pretty fresh build
>>745754734You can fly through the clouds or above them. It looked amazing in RDR2
>>745753828Who cares? You're just going to use an in-game GPS to move around anyway.Let me be an old faggot for a second and say open world games were a lot more fun when there weren't waypoints every 10 feet. When you spent the entire game just trying to memorize how to get around places and discovering new things while traveling (and getting lost. alot). That was part of the fun. Being dripfed instructions on what to do? Might as well just be watching a stream. You may be turning the wheel, but you're still on rails.
Visually it looks less interesting than 5, 5 looked more alive somehow
>>745762745Why do people want less GTA in their GTA games now? Serious question, everyone seems to be into "RP" now as if the game were some sort of lifesim
>>745766864Visually you look like a fag
>>745754721It's easier to develop for two consoles than it is PC. Plus they can double dip. This is a known Rocjstar strategy.
>>745754721they've said multiple times that the only reason they're doing it is because people are cattle and are more likely to buy the game twice if they delay one version
