[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/v/ - Video Games


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


>Nintendo won't make a new Star Fox so make a legally distinct copy of it and even play up the involvement of Giles Goddard
>Nintendo then immediately surprise reveals a new Star Fox game to release a month and a half later, two months before your own game

Some luck, huh?
>>
>>745984987
>a new Star Fox game
You mean a remake
>>
>indie ripoff that does nothing new vs nintendo ripoff that does nothing new
sucks to be a starkek
>>
I always think that it's legit to make a rip off if it's based on a series that is dead/dormant. I still thought that this looked like shit, and thought that it was pretty funny how it all went down.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.