Can modern games finally use more than 8 cores?
why do i need this
>>746077506Chips are good to you
Yes. But name a CPU where you'd want to use more than 8 for gaming. Everything is either 8P cores max or cross die latency hell
Trying to escape that Intel psycho in the other thread OP?
>>746077564Honestly I've not seen whatever that thread is.
Many apps still don't utilize multi core but many utilize threading.>16Double it up AMD.
>>746077462>antisemitic micro devicesfuck you goy
>>746077506it's fastI like to go fast
>>746077551There's a 5800xt (16 cores) for the same price as a 5700x3d where I live, it's quite tempting to me but IDK, maybe it'll be even worse for gaming.
>>7460777515900XT*
>>746077462why do you want them to use more than 8 cores?
>>746077751most games use 6 cores at most, rarely 8 like cp77. 12+ cores is needed if you multitask a lot and for workloads (not games).
>>746077947I found a cheap 5900XT deal, trying to see if it makes any sense to me.
>I NEED all the cores>Uses dx11 launch optionWhat causes this level of retardation?
>>746077462>Buy new game>Core 0 >100%
>>746078056Bummer. I'll get the 5700x3d I guess.
>>746078237x3d version is better than the 5900xt, the L3 cache is what's important for gaming.This is assuming you're going to use linux of course.
>>746077712I am embarrassed on your behalf for those wallpapers.
>>746078378I use both, there are some games that I'm too retarded to make it work on linux.
>>746077712>>746078428I'm getting secondhand embarrassment reading this post.
>>746077462Gay overrated CPU. You literally don't need more than an i5
>>746078428>>746078650my girlfriend said it reminds them of hersucks to suck
>>746078750Your girlfriend is implying you must take pics of her and put her on your desktop, slowpoke. Women are all about implying implications and shit.
>>746078650>2033x1082
>>746078687Yes, yes, we know you don't play any game made after 2005. This thread isn't for you.
>>746078687christ you retards will cope with literally anything
no you need 2 at most. one for ui, the other for loading/unloading
>>746078813I'm autistic, I ain't got time for that shitif bitches aren't going to be upfront about what they want they will lose to my waifu
>>746078998>I'm autisticNo, you're not, you're self diagnosed. Autism won't land girlfriends or the ability to converse with society.
>>746077506good single core performance for older games
>>746079176>dude you have to pay some retarded bitch thousands of dollars to tell you what you already knowor I could just be a man and be smart, a woman like you wouldn't understand self reflection
>>746077712>>746079193so more cache = faster? more so than whatever clock speed they list?is this only for games?
>>746079221Or you don't have to diagnose yourself with a made up Jew illness and stop being a midwit. You have an overly active ego, not autism, it's as obvious as your usual pajeet-like attempt to put people down.
A CPU's power isn't in its muzzle velocity or its caliber.It's in its performance. Go look at gaming benchmarks.
>>746079393But a CPU doesn't have muzzle velocity or caliber. And fuck userbenchmarks and their meltdowns over AMD.
>>746079362Some games can use cache very well, others not really. I have no idea why it's that the case but based on the benchmarks I've seen it doesn't look like it's based on release date or whatever.
>>746077751>>7460777965900XT is still max 6 cores per die.
>>746079391shut up you worthless nigger a cotton picking slave I rape in the stable every day has more value than youI know you're just a mentally retarded shitskin but white people have real mental illnesses besides dysentery induced delusions
>>746079551>white people have real mental illnessesAnd last I checked, the majority of them were genetically Jewish. Post nose, rabbi.
>>746079434Not userbenchmarks.Gaming benchmarks.
>>746079638Gaming benchmarks comparing unoptimized UE5 slop? You might as well use emulator-based benchmarks like dolphin to really test your PC, those are more accurate.
>>746079692You can remain a retard like you are too.
>>746079502>cores per dieI don't think that makes any difference at all. You either need them for productivity or you don't if the heaviest load you'll do is gaming. 5900XT is 8 cores per die, though.
>96MB L3factorio BAYBEE
>>746079752>I don't think that makes any difference at allWhether all the threads in use are running on the same die or not on a Ryzen CPU makes a big difference in games. Even on the 16-core CPUs (have a 7950X myself for productivity use) it's better to limit games to run on one CCD only.
>>746077462i wonder what would happen if they just put like 5 gigabytes of cache at the cpu
>>746080151That's the trend, it'll get there sooner or later. >1GB of L3 cache
>>746080151whatever program that would fit inside the largest layer of cache becomes bottlenecked the the next largest, and at some point of going down this chain of making the caches bigger, the memory doesn't help because the core device itself just can't process any faster.I'd agree with you if the cores were, like, 4x wider, or 3x faster, but we arent getting 15Ghz on silicon
>>746079972Uh, I guess that's why the 5900XT is kinda close in gaming performance to the 5800X3D.
>>746077462I bought an Intel 270k because it's down to around 200 bucks and is competitive with this
>>746077462It will not happen.Gameplay code is so tangled that everyone resorts to single-threaded execution of game logic, because otherwise you’ll have race conditions up the wazoo, unless you’re very careful with how you write it (which won’t happen since developers find it hard enough to even build a working product).
