>>746084762
0%, the industry isn't the same

>>746084762
I expect a 92-95, from what we have seen so far, looks like GTA V which isn't bad graphically, but the mind blowing, however it seems to be another Rockstar game that pushes beyond what is thought to be technologically possible.

>>746084762
It'll get an 100 and /v/ will seethe.

>>746084824
QRD?

after watching the leaks 0%

>>746085027
A lot of game journalists now are similar to click bait YouTube influencers. So to get the best click bait, you want to tank the GTA score as it'll get a ton of views.
The most profitable GTA score will be to give it a 40 and meme a bunch of shit about the game for click bait captions.

>>746084762
if you work for a big publication and give it less than 10/10 you'd be swimming in death threats

>>746085216
this
then spend 2 years fixing it and releasing a better version on PC getting the classic shitstorm of manchildren trying to prove to each other that their version of the toy was better

Based on the leaks it already a looks like a generation defining game so I expect lots of 10/10s