>will change the graphics>will change the music>might add voice acting>will probably keep the block pushing puzzles and simplistic combat the sameWhat's even the point of "nostalgia" if the nostalgic elements get changed?
>>746453064It's not just for oldfags but for newfags as well. Why would I want a 1:1 remake? I want it to be remastered and modernized but in good ways.
>>746453064>What's even the point of "nostalgia" if the nostalgic elements get changed?You say that like the music will be unrecognizable. It will likely be refined soundtracks based on the older soundtracks. The leitmotifs will likely still be there.
Waiting on it to be announced that a Western dev is working on it.
>>746455503Fair, but the midi cheese is part of the appeal for me. There are also some sample based tunes (forest temple) and I wonder how they are going to remake those. Are they going to use HD samples or a bunch of shitty singers?
>>746456557eh reh
>>746453064>will probably keep the block pushing puzzles and simplistic combat the samelol no it wont
>>746457094instead it'll have block moving puzzles!
>>746457169It's much better if we're being honest.
>>746457550yes because the sales make it better, obviously
>>746455038>modernized but in good waysName exactly 1 (one) case of this ever happening
>>746453064thank fuck for gta because I will have it as a distraction if Oot blows (faithful remaster with no real changes). I almost hope it does blow so I don't have to buy a switch 2 yet
>>746457924there's a first time for everything
>>746457924Metroid Zero Mission
>>746453064>might add voice actingOf all the things, this ones a guarantee, and should be expectedn the trailer already had narrator even.
>>746453064I suppose I'll post it here.https://files.catbox.moe/732faw.zip (OOT)https://files.catbox.moe/3igt6s.zip (MM 2ship)https://files.catbox.moe/0bl8bv.zip (MM Recomp)
>>746459095fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck shit shit shit shit shit shit shit shit shit shit shit shit shit shit shit shit shit shit shit shit
>>746459095The ironic thing is, as a kid I thought Nintendo was cheap and cringe for not putting in voice acting. Now I'm dreading them putting it in. Similarly they finally translated their games to Dutch when I became good at English, and they made their games easy as shit when I became good at video games.
>>746459623What is it?
>>746459623I will use this post as an excuse to share a piece of OOT PC news.Mod support is currently experiencing a renaissance, and an alternative version of SOH has been established with the explicit goal of breaking OOT's limitations.I think it's really funny that all of this finally happened the same year as OOTR.>>746462101OOT/MM PC port(s).
>>746457094How will it do physics puzzles when the items aren't made for it?
>>746464654I would be disappointed if they weren't reinventing the items, the way they *always* have done from game to game.
>>746466241Except for remakes
>>746466241You seem to be confusing this remake for a wholly new game.
>>746466404This is the first Zelda remake.>>746467223Remakes are a wholly new game made from the ground up. If it's not differentiated from the original there would be no reason to do a remake, in lieu of a remaster.
/v/ used to have circlejerks about>heh i ackshully know the difference between a remake and a remasterbut now that Nintendo is making a remake we suddenly have a horde of retards claiming OOTR and WWHD are the same animal.It's a pathetic display.
>>746468405Link's Awakening was a remake and as far as I know it didn't change any puzzles. Not sure, haven't played it.
>>746453064It's going to be made more like Twilight Princess. Because, by the developers own admission, they don't even know what made the N64 games tone and style. It was one part system limitations, one part random ideas and one part trying to emulate the older games. So with every 3D game that followed, they tried to emulate what Ocarina did. And never succeeded. The big problem with OoT remake is it's going to lack the "tone" of the original. In the same way FF7 Remake did. They probably are also not going to restrain themselves and put in a ton of story edits to connect Ocarina of Time to every game that followed it and make it the anchor for all the timeline crap. Again, like FF7 Remake.
>>746469349Good post. I feel weird caring about these kinds of things. Zelda is the only franchise I've called myself a fan of in the last 15 years.
>>746453064For money and to overwrite the memory of the old title in the collective subconscious.
Id like the combat to be improved, but I'd honestly really like it if the dungeons were changed, like the layout and puzzles were just differentI feel like making ANOTHER remake at this point would be kinda ass if its still the exact same block puzzlesI'm fine with those, but change them into new ones, so to speak, instead of just copy pasting them from 20 years ago
>>746469004It changed quite a bit, and brought in DX content, and a whole dungeon maker feature.
>>746469349>It's going to be made more like Twilight Princess.take my money
>Remake an old classic and add things that couldn't be added in the original due to technical limitations and /or time constraints. Make the game what it was always supposed to be according to the creators vision. Can be fantastic, can also be catastrophic. Final Fantasy VII Remake is somewhere inbetween. It would be great if OoT got this kind of remake (done right of course), but I doubt it. >Remake a popular game without adding anything to it except modernizing it in some aspects. Mostly serves to get younger people invested in the franchise. And old fans will buy it anyway. Resident Evil Remakes are mostly this. >Remake a game that had nice ideas poorly executed, or some deep but obvious flaws that could be fixed with a remake. I guess Final Fantasy 14 A Realm Reborn kind of falls into this category after the immense failure that was 1.0 Which of the first two will it be for OoT?
>>746457094The switch zelda games are especially why I think they're going to change a lot of shit up.The simplistic block moving puzzles were fine thirty years ago when people weren't used to adventure games and puzzle solving in a 3d environment.But by today's standards OoT 's puzzles and combat is baby's first adventure game tier.Even the most simplistic shrines in BotW do more interesting things than half of the dungeons in OoT.
>>746458503>casualized slop for the massesMiss me with that trash.
>>746469349>it's going to lack the "tone" of the originalIf Fuji is allowed anywhere near it, they'll plaster Skyward Sword-isms in as many nooks and crannies as possible.If they're pulling a FF7R with OOTR, I'm expecting another Demisedorf.
>>746470526>block pushing is bad>block pushing, koroks is good
I want them get rids of the master sword time skip bs and make it take actual real life time to let link get older so we all progress thru the game in real time together over the years and they should add stuff continually to the game over this time so we keep playing until link is a adult …
>>746470726Who are you quoting?
>>746459982What's the problem? You're not a subhuman retard who plays Japanese games in English, are you?
>>746470885What's the answer?
OoT was cool when I was a teenager but I've never cared enough to replay it and the trailer aesthetic looked awful so the remake will probably suck. I never wanted a remake anyway.
>>746471060The answer to what?To your fictional strawman?
>>746471141So you dont have an answer.
Honestly I kinda get what you mean.The Star Fox 64 remake was competent. But It just kind of made me want to play Star Fox 64 afterwards. It didn't scratch the same itch.
>>746471265>outsourced slop was competentI hate shills so damn much.
>>746456674doodoo doo doo
>>746470526Exactly, Oot's dungeons are 100% being redesigned.
>>746453064>will changeyou'd rather pay for the same shit you stupid nigger?
>>746459982>"Oh no, not voice acting in a modern Nintendo game! Save me Sony!"
>>746471351Water Temple enjoyers...
>>746471398But star fox was 100% sony pandering. What kinda moron wants more storyshit in a game?
>>746457924OOT 3D turning the iron boots into a touchscreen button so you don't have to keep opening the menu over and over to take them off or put them on.Also adding gyro aiming.
>>746470530>It doesn't count!EverySingle Time lol
>>746471507Especially when they're just going to reboot the series back to the original Lylat Wars incident again in like 20 years.
A good way to figure out if a game is really good is to imagine whether, with a more appropriate level design (even if it uses the same mechanics), it would be as playable as it was in the past.Super Mario World, for example, is perfectly playable today, and there are ROM hacks that keep the mechanics intact but improve the level design, and the game is basically better than any modern 2D platformer. Therefore, SMW is a good game.Doom 2 is another famous example. Modern megawads (even those that use all the vanilla mechanics), are better than practically every retro shooter released today. Therefore, Doom 2 is a good game.Ocarina of Time, despite improving significantly with a decent campaign/adventure (there are good romhacks for this), unfortunately never becomes a really good game. That's why the remake can't just be more of the same… They'll have to change the game's fundamental mechanics, because it's just too flawed.>>746471265From the videos I've seen, they've removed all the visual and auditory feedback, like when you hit enemies in the original game, and they wobble, glow, and make a distinctive sound. These are things the Japanese have mastered for decades, but Westerners still have a hard time understanding. The new Star Fox sometimes has no feedback at all, just "realistic" effects when you hit enemies...Feedback, in my opinion, is what makes things satisfying. The way your projectiles hit enemies, the way they explode, the sound they make, and so on. The new Star Fox is a total step backward in this regard.
>>746471507Found you, sealion.Suddenly cinematic cutscenes and voice acting are bad when Nintendo does it.Just like how Elden Ring and Oblivion are now bad because they're on the Switch 2.Just like how Persona 5 Royal is bad because it's on Switch.And so on.
>>746471507it's Zelda, dudeBotw was the best Zelda game, but the number one complaint was make it more linear and story centric
>>746470530If that's slop, what would you call the original with all its copy-pasted areas and health-farming?
>>746471794ahead of its time, it's like 40 kilobytes and invented a genre
>>746471794He'll call it anything he thinks will milk the most engagement out of you, you stupid fish.
>>746471745>>746471641>botw was the best zeldaNot even as good as zelda 1. Come on man. Gameplay is supposed to be more important than anything else. When did you guys transition into snoys?
>>746453064You forgot that they'll add blacks and pronouns too
>>746471794Better than handholding trash.
>>746471897lol
>>746471897We didn't.We're still Nintendo fans.We enjoy having some cinematics to go with our gameplay.But modern Nintendo games have cinematics in moderation, unlike PlayStation games.
>>746471914But it's okay when PlayStation does it?
>>746472035>We enjoy having some cinematics to go with our gameplay.Like i said, you became snoys. You hate gameplay without some cinematic constantly popping up and telling you how to feel.
>>746471398What does sony have to do with it?
>they're injecting the console war script to derail the thread talking about specific video gamesIsn't it weird that the mental illness in Zelda threads has been allowed to go unchecked for like ten years now?The mods truly are gay.
Duskbloods is a Nintendo exclusive
>>746472112We have not become snoys.The next big blockbuster Nintendo games that will be revealed soon will be different from sony games, even if they have cinematic elements and 4K graphics.
>>746472317You sure act like snoys, when someone says they prefer the original games without disgusting excess cinematics shoved in.
>>746453064>will still have the owl repeat infinitely if you hit b like a retard
The praise that BOTW/TOTK got was always artificial and forced compared to OOT. Anyone who played those open world Zelda's, knows that both games have nothing to offer after the first 10 hours. OOT still gets a thread every day on /v/ while no one discusses TOTK anymore. The remake will continue to make these games irrelevant it and it terrifies the BOTW fag
>>746457169You could reverse this image and it works just as good if not better
>>746459095I almost pissed myself laughing at the narrator because it sounded like the intro to the sleepycast.
>>746472424SOUL
>>746472415I was born when cinematic games were just getting started, in the early to mid 2000s.Around the end of the PS2 generation.Before the Xbox 360 released.
>>746453064I think the thing that's gonna bother me to most it that once again, Nintendo will cheap out on the voiceacting that's inevitably going to be part of this. I can just feel it. They seem dead set on hiring "talent" off Twitter and Youtube, with all but Prime 4's voicework sounding like random people picked off the street who can barely act and do terrible accents.
>>746472653I love BotW.I still have to find the 4th shrine, but by myself, so it doesn't count as cheating.
>>746472093No
>>746462747I'm not interested in the idea of that making some 32x larger OOT game possible, I'm interested if it can be used to say, take the base game and make it 8x more detailed while still effectively running the native performance code.People have pushed Source engine -beyond- its limits but the only effect is, while impressive, making the maps single-thread demanding.
>>746472846I don't think it's going to be like Star Fox 2026 where there is good voice acting, but could use some improvement, for example, the Macbeth train conductor.There wasn't really any voice acting in OoT other than "Hey, listen!".
>>746472859It's a good thing Nintendo still has plenty of gameplay.
>>746472923>take the base game and make it 8x more detailed while still effectively running the native performance code.You mean what Star Fox 64 3D and Ocarina of Time 3D were?The same N64 games, but upscaled?No thanks.
>>746473169no, not upscaled,let's say some dev takes those 32x expanded limits and uses them instead of just n64-but-bigger, it's the same engine but an object is 8x more detailed using that 32x larger asset window. like you rescale the engine units
>>746473248Ok.
>>746453064Nintendo is not releasing this garage this year, they thought they had a dick big enough to do it and I don't think they do.
>>746472679>"no u"compelling.
>>746473107I don't care about gameplay, I want blackless and trannyless games
>>746459623Are these plug n play or need a emu?
lol
Nobody cares, zelda has been replaced by genshin impact
>>746472679>>746473627>he was felted by a png for 20 minutes
>>746473718I came back from smoking cigarettes and was still laughing, had to be done.
>>746473524You probably won't have to worry about that in Oot or the next Mario and Zelda.Assuming you aren't just virtue signaling to hate on Nintendo games you can't steal.
>>746473718It took you 20 minutes to come up with a reply to a completely different person and you passed it off like an own?Seems you are seething.
>>746472653It wasn't artificial for BotW, it was rooted in optimism for the future that never manifested, and now that it's come and gone, it's easy to say it aged poorly.TotK's hype was absolutely artificial however, especially all the press about LE MAGIC TECH WIZARDY WOWZORS OMG.
>>746462747So is it possible to make custom shit now in OoT? Can a retard like me make custom shit with no experience?
>>746453064I'd rather they just make an entirely new version of OOT than 1:1 remake the original
>>746455769India and china is not western.
>>746473845Dude I bought a switch 2 just to play Xenoblade 2 in a prettier way, I just hate remakes
>>746473905Custom shit's been possible for years in the N64 version, it's the PC port that lagged behind for a long time in offering those capabilities.
>>746457924Dragon Quest II. Basically improved on the original in every conceivable way (except the localization as usual).
>>746473919You're in luck then
>>746473946Then ignore the remakes.
>>746473946can you walk/run faster in xenoblade? I tried one, but shit just wasn't fun since it took forever to get anywhere
>>746473527>plug n playShould be.>>746473905It finally got a level editor in July.https://preludeoflight.com/>with no experience:(
>>746474192>:(
>>746453064I'm just saying now, its better if you're an original fan like me, to abandon all hope. Anyone who was involved with the original ocarina of time's development has since moved on or changed their development goals and style. Aside needing to change because they cannot just release the same game over again, there's no one left that cares at Nintendo. Not even people like Aonuma's dumb ass who've been there since forever.There is absolutely zero chance this will be for the original fans. It's going to be catered to newgen gamers, and Nintendo is going to cash in on their golden goose.
>>746453064>gold instead of redAlready going for the soulless colors
>>746475972The bigger red flag in the logo is reusing the SS/BotW Master Sword and Hylian Shield designs.
>>746475364I would argue a lot of the younger people in Nintendo, who grew up playing older games like Ocarina, would probably care a lot about doing a faithful remake. But it's people like Aonuma and Miyamoto, who control the production, who insist on change for the sake of change. The question is, will this remake be farmed out to the new people and mostly ignored, like the Link's Awakening one was. Or will the old veterans be a big part of it.I also disagree it will cater to new gen gamers. It'll cater to whoever is making it. Nintendo isn't like Sony or most of the other companies chasing the phantom "modern audience." Instead they tend to obsess over doing something wildly different just to be different like I said. Which sometimes lands but more often than not leads to annoying the fanbase. Just not from the angle you're talking about.
>>746476035The biggest red flag on the teaser is the Triforce appearing on Link's hand. Before he's even started the journey or even talked to the Deku tree. This is a big sign they're going to alter the plot to focus more on timeline crap and memberberries for the fans. It may seem like a minor thing but there's an actual story reason in the original game you don't see the trifroce on his hand until the final battle. But Nintendo either forgot or is actively trying to change it. Like they've been doing for a lot of things since Wind Waker.
>>746475972>gold instead of redIf they do the cartridge then it will wrap back around into soul.
>>746453064Any proof of anything in your post? I really want real news for this game.
>>746476153would be kind of kino if they made the switch cartridge gold like the n64 ones
>>746477632That's what I meant, gold title, gold cartridge.
>>746456557Why buy nuOOT if you want to play oldOOT?>>746456674I hope they add this unironically as alternative OST.
>>746471589>They'll have to change the game's fundamental mechanics, because it's just too flawed.Like, I don't technically disagree, because I believe SOME mechanical changes are necessary, but the amount of mechanical change (in terms of what actions Link is capable of) the game would need is absolutely minimal, as the game is already incredibly expressive in a way that few games are, but just needs some refinement that lets this shine.The game benefits greatly from taking advantage of the degree to which it allows "dynamic action problems", i.e. there can be obstacles and enemies placed in strategic ways which behave slightly unpredictably, preventing you from trivially solving problems without taking damage or wasting resources by just performing something straightforwardly, but which can be dealt with by improvising various things that make use of your various tools and abilities. Dungeons based around this type of thing can be taken very far.
>>746473874>LE MAGIC TECH WIZARDY WOWZORS OMG.That was genuinely completely warranted though. People vastly underestimate how much harder it is to do a number of non-trivial things in combinations that naturally conflict with each other than it is to pull them off in isolation. If anything people are downplaying how much of an accomplishment this was and is. It would be cool to incorporate some of this stuff in the remake as long as it's done tastefully.
>>746473248The SoH engine has been able to load highly detailed modded graphical objects for years now, and you can download these mods off Game Banana. Full reskinned overhauls of the game already work on older versions of it.These limits have nothing to do with that, but are about letting you make the equivalent of much larger, more expansive and detailed maps from later Zelda games with more complex structure that the game would otherwise not be able to handle, and add these totally new scenes to the existing game.
Orpen ride Gaijin, eat yor sloppu
>>746480763It will be perfect if it looks like this.
>>746455038All you'll get is bad voice acting, a shittier menu, nog "hylians", and the furfag version of Rauru.Enjoy.
>>746481365We will be playing our wonderful OoT remake while you sit in your mother's basement glazing sony.
>>746474071X gives you a Sonic sprint and a moon jump that lets you mountain goat up everything, you get a mech later on that speeds up things even more, and the remake gives you a fighter jet if none of that's enough. If you don't like the movement speed in 1 give X a shot.
>>746480763looks amazing
>>746462747I want this but for Twilight Princess
>>746484976Funny that you say that.
>>746485174what texture mod is that
>>746485924Texture mod?
>>746486057Oh I see, what the fuck.
>>746480856>>746483515kill yourselves
>>746486196Make us.
For the Recomp are they dx11? Can someone test the dlss5 for shits n giggles
1:1 remakes the worst, they destroy the nostalgia by changing the vibe of the game while also not modernizing it so its still dated. It's like the worst of both worlds
>>746477632I wish, they really needed a yellow Bananza cart
>>7464579244K@60 FPS korok forest in BotW for Switch 2
Im pretty sure only osawa understands oot, does he even still work at ninty?This game is probably going to be a dumpsterfire if they change the dungeons. There's not a single game out there that managed to recreate a similar feeling set of dungeons.
>>746489826All 4 directors have recent credits, actually most of the staff appear to still be at Nintendo.
>>746471864It didn't do much that Zelda didn't do half a year earlier.
>>746455038Why would anyone that loves OOT want a mutilated version of it? Either go 1:1 remake with flashy unreal engine graphics, or make a new game.Either way its gonna suck major dick and balls. They will remove every single bit of soul from the game trying to appeal to "modern audiences".
>>746473464As if the meme is compelling >thing, angry face>different thing, soiface
>>746472726Obscure reference, had to look it up. You're right kekhttps://m.youtube.com/watch?v=3R5GG8fzuQI
>>746490910See >>746488949
>>746471565^>>746471864Never seen that image before. Must be fanart but it is nice.
>>746480763There should be no possibility of it being like this because not even BOTW or TOTK was like that and they were open world games. Nintendo knows to respect the player's intelligence is what those games proved.
>>746494275>respect the player's intelligence That's a generous way to put it. They trust them to not be completely retarded but it's nothing like a 90s point and click game or even dark souls.
>>746470241I don't really think saying it brought it DX content means anything when every version of the game available after the DX version came out was the DX version. They didn't put the regular one on the 3DS eshop or on the switch emulator, they clearly think the DX version replaced the original.
>>746457924here, have a few
I'd accept it if it got northern journey graphics
>>746453064everyone expecting this game to be anything more than a HD remaster is going to be greatly disappointed
>>746497326Yeah, I don't know why people are expecting it. Nintendo is doing the usual pattern of teaser trailer first, and they think OoT itself is high profile enough to sell, but people act like they're hiding something.
I need Okami 2 for my proper Zelda fix
>>746494275>Nintendo knows to respect the player's intelligence is what those games proved.They're sandbox games with unskippable tutorials (if you try to leave you don't get to actually interact with anything on the ground world to show that you're not ready since you just get void warped back to where you fell from), they only have 4/5 short dungeons, you're given a frequently updated quest log and map markers, and TotK stops what you're doing mid-tutorial to make you learn about fucking Heart Containers because they had to account for TotK possibly being someone's first Zelda and for how much fucking stupider young people got in the 6 years since BotW.
>>746497113>RE1makeRE1make is RE3make tier bad and i'm tired of newfags pretending otherwise
Nintendo really killed all leaks, right? /v used to have tons of threads about Nintendo direct, leaks and rumors and now only very bad fakes and barely even.The game is coming out in a couple of months and we know fucking nothing about it, only that it has realistic graphics.
>>746500058I still don't get how the great plateau is a "tutorial". It's the same game as it is later on, just smaller. I died more frequently on the great plateau than I did anywhere else. I understand that you want to skip it on replays, but still.
>>746500420>Nintendo really killed all leaks, rightOoT Remake and Star Fox 26 were literally leaked ahead of time. Plus we had the Zelda 40th anniversary hardware packaging proofs leaked more recently as well.
>>746455038The aspect that comes with this is that the new "modernization" will be canon.Let's say they remove Bongo Bongo and make something different. Is this an alternate timeline or is this canon?
>>746500621>I still don't get how the great plateau is a "tutorial".Because it's where the game teaches you core mechanics and concepts. The Plateau Shrines tell you how to use your Runes, and Old Man explains/demonstrates various mechanics around the Plateau.
>>746500886>The Plateau Shrines tell you how to use your RunesMaybe with a small handful of short textboxes. Old Zelda games had you finding items throughout the game, so by that logic the entire games were tutorials.
>>746453064The original is readily available on NSOThe original and 3DS versions are infinitely emulateable with tons of optional adjustments if you likeThere’s no basis for complaints against a remake trying something new when preservation of the original is done by both Nintendo and fans alike
>>746456557They did a good job with Star Fox. I love the midi samples of 64 but the orchestration is nuts, Meteo for example sounds so epic and grand. An orchestrated Hyrule Field theme would make me nut
>746501070so you're just being obtuse on purpose
>>746501159It boils down to this.If Nintendo is going to remake OoT AGAIN, NOW, it better literally the best thing ever ever made or there's basically not even a point to it. You could take the game as is, preserve it as well as you can, fix the things that are actually wrong with it and take everything far enough that there's nothing about it that you can point to and say "but this other game did x better", and you would actually achieve that and it would trivially mog the absolute fuck out of whatever GTA6 is going to be a hundred times over and they could release that and rub it in everyone's face with a " I hope you rike it".
>>746501159They're spending resources on pure cringe that could be spent on something actually new.
show of hands: how many of you wanting this remake to be "new" and complaining about the the idea of it being "a rehash" also happily bought into tears of the kingdomcome on now, don't be shy
>>746455769it'll be superior Indian talent like starfoxand it will win goty
>>746501625>being "a rehash"There's absolutely no problem with it being a "rehash" of the absolute GOAT of gaming. Anyoen who says they want it to have 'freeclimbing' or whatever about 'modern standards' should shoot themselves.There would absolutely be a problem though if nothing substantial is added to it and it just ends up a UEslop moviegame version of something otherwise already bordering nigh on perfection with a dozen existing releases.
>>746501625Tears isn't a rehash
>>746501348Not as obtuse on purpose as someone who refuses to give a (you)
>>746502235>overworld from BotW>plot structure (told as collectible flashbacks) like BotW>dungeons in the same regions as BotW>villain the same as BotW>Zelda loses everyone in the past and seals herself away for many years to try to help Link like BotW>tons of reused assets from BotW>not a rehash
64 OOT is already exactly what I want it to be. The DS port was superfluous. I didn’t care for the Link’s Awakening Remake. I would rather Nintendo try new things with this remake. Not BOTW style, but overhauled dungeons and side quests and character moments like the manga. I am normally a faithful remake or no remake kind of guy but Nintendo still makes excellent first party games so I trust them to do right by one of their classics. If my trust is misplaced, I will always have the original.
>>746502565Using those parameters almost every single Zelda is a rehash. It has a significantly altered BotW map, the sky and underground, and entirely new abilities including ascend which completely changes how you interact and traverse the map. I could go into far more detail but why bother. The more ideas OoT Remake gets from TotK the better. I'm also very intrigued by what they plan to implement from Hyrule Warriors since they said they were going to do that
>>746503247>Using those parameters almost every single Zelda is a rehashthis is the most retarded cope I've ever seen
>>746459623What’s the difference between 2ship and recomp?
>>746497113I still need to play the PSP Brandish
>>746503247>Using those parameters almost every single Zelda is a rehashname 1 3d zelda game that reuses an overworld besides totk
Please don’t BOTW my OOT. I want a perfection of the OOT formula instead.
>>746457169Gold>>746473627Mold
>>746503412No? They've reused the LttP map several times, TP is a complete rehash of OoT by your definition, MM entirely reuses assets from OoT
September 8th.That is all I will say.
>>746503812That means it comes out October 22nd. Dear God please let that be true
HD Link struggling inside a Like-Like as it dissolves his clothes.
>>746459623I need the two harkinians measuring each-other gif if anyone has it.
>>746500707They were leaked but it was questioned if they were real. Same with super Metroid remake which we still haven’t heard if it’s true or not.
>>746504050The kirby amiibo dates were leaked and quickly taken down.OOT remake is looking like a November 12th release.
>>746504050Why does it matter?
