>ah yes I shall buy a game that I clearly dont like>barely play it>negatively review it>explain that its not a game that I like in my review>but I still bought itValve should ban these retards
Sounds based to me
Based af
>>747554568AHAHAHAHAHAHFAGGOT
>>747554568>this is the gameLMAOOODIOS MIOLA CREATURA
>cropped tweetyou already posted this
>>747554721baited
>>747554568Take it
>>747554568>>747551047
>>747554568Based
>>747554568The bigger problem on steam reviews is that people don't actually review the game, they siimply state "good" or "bad" with minimal, almost rage bait fashionI always have to scroll the review page to find a few long ones that actually list what's wrong and what's good about the game
>>747554568love to see devs seething
>WEG dev with a decent patreon complaining about a lone retard despite his double dipped steam release having 750+ reviews
>>747554960>review type: negative >playtime: 5-10+ hours>chinese: filtered>scroll down a bitHas never failed me once
>>747554568>you should only buy games you already know you'll like before you even play itkill yourself tranny
>>747555030Youre a fucking retard do you buy a burger with fish on it despite knowing you hate fish on burger??
>"One day, young one you WILL look back and notice you grew up to become WEG chars"No wonder they wanted to GTFO of that isekai
its funny because its a weg
>>747555063Burger...
>>747554960This is why you ignore both reviews and scores. They're all decided by people who have no clue about the thing they're reviewing.
>>747555115Source on picrel?
>>747555413it appears to be the Dungeons & Dragons cartoon from the 80s
>>747554568He gave it a try for the first time and concluded he didn't like it. What's the issue here?
He was generous enough to give the game a chance despite disliking the themes, and the dev failed to prove his aversion wrong; so the negative review is justified
>>747555491Love old school shows with that aesthetic.
>>747555584He spent 30 minutes on it. I can't go through character creation, plus the additional pre gaming dookie. Plus finding something to eat while/before playing.
>>747554568Stop spamming your shit, faggot. Nobody cares.
>>747555653One thing you'll learn on 4chan is that, if you make repeated threads and people repeatedly bump up, someone does indeed care.
>>747555494It's chink review bombing and gaming journalist behaviour.
>>747555027this is the correct way to do this.I always check at least couple of negative reviews with pretty much same filters.Usually only those contain any useful and relevant information.
>>747554568Based, nobody care about D&D slop except millennials
>>747555357nah, you can still find objective reviews, but it's just necessary to look for them instead of just trusting the total review alignment
>>747555494he went into a genre he already hates, bearing an IP he already hates, and hated it. What did he expect?
>>747554960I completely get where you're coming from, but when I play a great game I simply leave a positive review saying: "Great game."Only for a negative review will I constructively and intensively take a massive shit on it.
>>747555875if you like a game, you should be respectful enough to give it a fair and detailed review.I get that hate is a very strong motivator in writing walls of text, but I still think it's an unforgivably lazy thing to do to just shit out a "lol good" or "ew bad" review
>>747555867how do you know? he might have started disliking dungeons and dragons and rpgs only after trying this game
>>747555027>chinese: filteredI wish you could do this on the workshop too.
DON'T PRESS F5, WORST MISTAKE OF MY LIFE
>>747555851>you can still find objective reviewsI mean you cannot really do that for things like art by definition, but obviously that's not what you meant. The problem is they'll always be dwarfed by inaccurate reviews and you, as someone without experience with the game yet, don't have the necessary context to figure out which ones are accurate. It's a boy who cried wolf scenario in reverse where the town is filled with liars.
>>747554568not your personal army
>>747556173>It's a boy who cried wolf scenario in reverse where the town is filled with liarsThat's why the length of the review is a key factoryou can tell someone actually knows what they're talking about when they go in to lenghty detail about why they think something is good/badLike for example, when I do a review, I often put a lot of comparisons to other games in the genre, so that anyone who actually plays games and knows them will recognize and understand the comparison.of course that doesn't mean that I leave it ambiguous or uninformative for people who don't know the comparison, but simply leave the comparison there as an extra layer and verification that I actually do know a thing or two about the game and others that are like it, enough that I can comfortably state what it does better or worse than some more mainstream games
>>747554568You should see my dark souls 1 review
>play game 1 hour>don't like>leave negative review>"It sux">autistic faggot retard leaves me clown emoji because he is too gay and feeble and retarded to reply like a man (I leave comments open on my reviews"lol game sux! Cry about it 2 your anime body pillow you niga
>>747556381>you can tell someone actually knows what they're talking about when they go in to lenghty detailBy that logic video essays that range from 1 hour to 10 would be accurate and objective reviews, but the reality is that they are more often littered with inaccuracies and subjective statements treated as objective ones, if not outright lies. The fact is that videogames are an interactive medium and even if we could trust reviews you still wouldn't really be able to know just from reading, at best you can gather a general vibe of the game. And we can't trust reviewers to begin with because they're in the same boat as journalism in the west where they should never be given the benefit of the doubt.
>>747554568Developers who cannot handle the slightest criticism should not develop games.
it's based to wipe my ass with someone else's labor because they're probably a trannyif anyone ever does it to me tho its the jews
>>747556881That's why you don't just pick one review to trust, you read as many as you bother toNobody is stupid enough to skip or buy a game based on a simple thumb up or thumb down icon
>>747554568>>747551047>autitst mad his 'clearly D&D themed' porn game with porn screenshots advertisting it wasn't liked by a user who came for the advertised porncheck 'Drooskati games' on Steam
>>747557334Stop trying to get /v/ to epic raid this dev and get a job
>>747554568What game?
>>747554568nobody cares you worthless retarded turd
>>747554960Or, even worse, the top reviews are all just shitty jokes/memes that tell you nothing about the quality of the game
>>747554568That's pathetic of the dev to respond to that, though
>>747554735Looks like a WEG
>actually finished>the DEI fagottery is comedy reliefAs far as WEGs goes, it was pretty gud btw, just needed a better evil path
>>747555063Who the fuck puts fish on a burger? Sounds like something I would leave a negative review for.
>>747560552It's even more pathetic of the dev to cry that the reviewer should be banned
>>747554568That's what I do with woke trash. Buy it, let it run for a couple minutes, immediately refund and drop a negative review. Get fucked libtards.
>>747560475I absolutely despise trying to get a genuine opinion on a game and all the reviews are just an anecdote of something funny that happened to the reviewer while playing ended with "10/10 would x again." Completely useless waste of time reviews that just inflate the scores of mediocre or bad games because they can produce funny moments.
>>747561565The game looks like some coomer dogshit UE5 slop. If anything, I hate steam allows bullshit like that to be on the store. I miss when these digital storefronts had some curation instead of just allowing everything through.
>>747554568he wouldn't have complained, if he gave it a thumbs up instead
>>747554960>Positive rating: "URHHHH GIRL WITH BOOBA? 10/10!"Like fuck off man, I'm here to read opinions on the gameplay and fun factor not read shitty copypasta memes.
>>747554568Yeah reviews like this are genuinely retarded I don’t understand it.
>>747561881>instead of just allowing everything through.Steam only bans visual novel eroges, AI slop futa games are fine to Gaben
>>747554960Bad post
>>747554568kek based
>>747554568The reviewer is obviously in the wrong here. But the dev is also in the wrong for replying to it. No matter how stupid the review is, you as the dev come off far worse by engaging with it unless it's genuine feedback that the dev actually resonates with and can reply something substantial with. The dev just comes off as butt hurt and whiny here, despite being right
>( Edit your response )
>>747554568but the devs made money and steam made monayWho gives a shit about what some tard thought about it
>>747564328KEK
>>747554960i rate games because i either like them and want to give them a positive score or hate them and i want to give them a negative scorei couldn't care less about you.
>>747562075>AI slop futa games are fine to GabenWhy does he have such shit taste?
>>747556381>you can tell someone actually knows what they're talking about when they go in to lenghty detail about why they think something is good/badwrong. it's the opposite. a lengthy review is from idiot midwits who try to impress their internet"peers" with quantity. i bet you are someone who unironically uses review templates with those checkboxes and then go like "mhmm yes quite the musical composition harmonizes with the aesthetic and the gameplay loop fits quite well with the metaprogression"
>>747556709you are the same by getting hung up on a single throwaway emoji and don't even realize it
>>747554568>edit your responseI will not buy your game
>>747554960I'm not paid to make reviews. You want to write an entire fucking essay? Fuck you. Were I interested in that, then I'd rather write a script for a youtube video, film it, and post it.
>I GOT RAPED HERE LOOK WHERE I GOT RAPEDokay okay okay
>>747554960Sometimes there's just a major deal breaker for you and in that case a simple one line review pointing it out is sufficient to warn others.
