I already played Vic2 and CK2, and I got burnout from both for how boring they were, are the other PDX games equal in terms of gameplay or not?The worst part of both games was>80% is looking at the screen seeing the time past in max. speed>5% is the notification spam-nuking of the same 5 events / quests / decisions (despite the DLCs were sell with "10k news events" or something like that)>10% moving units in the map and see 2 minion knocking each other>the final remaining 5% is micromanagement the chairs of the court in CK2 and dealing with the r(etarded)ebellious vassals; economy / influence / national focus in Vic2If in the end any of PDX are for me, is there any 4X / Grand-strategy game that is not boring as hell and is actually fun to play / invest your lifetime playing it without a feeling of wasting it or getting burnout?
Bump.
>>747563467Its about larping or powergaming tbdesu
Just do yourself a favour and play a real strategy game like Shadow Empire or Field of Glory Kingdoms/Empires.
>>747563467>>80% is looking at the screen seeing the time past in max. speedNigga, if that's an issue for you then this subgenre of strategy is just not made for you.Either give standard RTS a try (DoW1, WCIII, ...), or go the opposite direction and give classic turn-based strategy a chance (HoMM1/2/3).
>>747563467>group 3 division under a corps>group 3 corps under an army>group 3 armies under an army group>keep units in radio rangethis was too had for 80% of hoi3 players
>>747563467CK2 is not hard at all. It's only pdox gsg that I put a lot of hours into, since it also allows you to do dynastic roleplay. But I also got burned out so I didn't bother with CK3. The rest look even less interesting.
