What’s the appeal?
Got claimed by pedos, unfortunately, which means finding good fanart of her will be dangerous
I have this, so that trailer did nothing for me.
>>747584405Cunny
>>747584405
>>747584405Pedophilia
>>747587974>>747584529People who are outspoken against loli are always the real ones to watch out for.
>>747588082>outspoken against loliWho said this?
>>747588625Both those retards and/or you, if you're one of those retards.
>>747584405>the shorts make it look like the leggings are really tight
>>747584405There are two options>shorts the same color as her skin with tights>thigh highs with her meaty thighs squishing out the top and her bare coochie on displayRaw, unfiltered sexo designGaming is back
>>747588893The second guy only said "Pedophilia"Who said "against?"
>>747584405>people intentionally misreading the design to insert their shitty fetisheswork with the cards you get, faggots
>>747589584Do you have the reading comprehension of a gnat or are you being purposefully ignorant as some kind of retarded gotcha?
>>747589663They didn't say whether they are for or against it
>>747589723Nobody who actually like loli calls it that, dumbass. That's only the dumbasses who can't separate reality from fiction or the edgy larpers here who like to skirt on being permabanned.
>>747584405Purple feet with toes that taste like grapes.
>>747584405HNNNNNNGGGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHH
>>747589907>Nobody who actually like loli calls it thatIf only you knew how wrong you were
>>747592954he's not wrong though
>>747593171>he's not wrong though
>>>/b/953777103
>>747595247>>>/b/953777259Uoh
>>>/b/953777349These artists are so talented
>>>/b/953777541Mysterious Girl is quickly becoming a star in the lolicon community
>>747588625look into a guy called Dr. Pizza, for starters
>>747596081No, that sounds suspicious
>>747584405TDMT = Team of bodysD = Death of scalingM = Match the head to body ratio.
>>>/b/953778912Do you think she will get costume changes like Pauline?
>>747598164Dont think she will, seems more like a thing for kirby to get than her.
>>747598697Well, she might change forms at some point in the game. Maybe that sort of counts
>>747584405Eyelashes
>>747598757Yeah, at the end when she betrays you. Maybe kirby will keep his sexism and kill her off like sectonia.
>>747589907>>747593171>That's only the dumbasses who can't separate reality from fiction Loli-liker and pedophile here, it's not good to try and separate lolicon from pedophilia. Even if you tried to claim that the medium is different (fiction vs. reality), the root is still an attraction to childlike appearance, and as such anyone who likes loli is a pedophile be definition.Creating a semantic firewall between "I like loli" and "I'm a pedophile" serves no purpose other than comfort through denial. People who cannot honestly name what they're attracted to cannot meaningfully manage it. Acknowledgment is the first step toward whatever intervention or self-regulation a person might need, whether that's therapy or simply vigilance about their own behavior.I'm not saying every lolicon is a child molester, as there are plenty of non-offending pedophiles. I'm talking about being honest with yourself, not condemning anyone. Calling lolicon what it is (a manifestation of pedophilic attraction) isn't about vilifying people; it's about refusing to let comfortable lies replace uncomfortable truths. There's no danger in the label, but there is in the denial.
>>747598945Shut up, retard.
>>747598945There you goHe admitted it!
will she be evil and/or related to the main antagonist, or is that too trite for the series atp?
>>747599263Definitely some relation to the antagonist but that could be anything, maybe not directly blood related because thats been done alot before.
>>747599263She might be a contagonist, but not a direct antagonist.
>>747599263Dark Matter who has become so obsessed with Kirby it became a cute girl.
>Crash into Pop Star>Force all of your baggage onto Kirby>He fixes your problems and then you fuck off foreverWhy are they all like this?
>>747599783That is not what happened in forgotten land anon, popstars population got kidnapped by forgo.
>>747599828Kirby or Samus, who can SUCC harder?
>>747599560>>747599452>>747599263You guys already forget that Elflin wasn't evil?HAL is breaking Kirby traditions left and right.
>>747589907This is like saying you aren't gay for fapping to yaoi cause they are fictional men
>>>/b/953780302
>>747600096What if someone faps to sissy traps getting taken by big burly men but is happily married with a wife a three kids????
>>747600236Shut up.You have no morals.You have no principles.You exist for nothing.Believe in nothing.A soulless beast.
>>>/b/953780414>>747600096>>747600236Bi
>>747600063Yeah but elflin was directly related to forgo as part of elfilis. So that still counts to what the original poster said.Its not much of a tradition either tbf, only marx and magolor fit it. Most of the time its kirby befriending them after killing the main antagonist.
>>747600096If someone only faps to it in fiction, then no, they're not. There are things that only work in fiction. I like giant, grotesque tits and nipple fucking because that only looks good in 2D.
>>747600663It's still homoerotic at least
>>747584529you are angry about the wrong things"dangerous" as if anyone is going to arrest you for a fucking Kirby cartoonfuckin goofy ass
>>747600905>as if anyone is going to arrest you for a fucking Kirby cartoonIt will happen, just you waitPalantir Flock ZOG AI surveillance is coming for everyone eventually
>>747598945it's not about admitting anything. it's about communication. thanks to retards like you mixing up every term on every occasion, it is now harder than ever to tell if someone's talking about fiction or real life. you used to be able to say "i like lolis" and everyone knew instantly that you mean fiction. now you have either clarify like a faggot or just hope the ones you talk to get it. i don't come to a video game board to talk about real life shit, i'm here to talk about vidya and vidya characters, i'm not interested in others' real life preferences and i'm not willing to share mine. i am well aware of what i'm into, but i don't feel the need to tell everyone and talk about it, especially not on a video game board. it's infuriating you can't even talk about fiction anymore without some retard bringing up real life EVERY FUCKING TIME. and if you think equating fiction and reality will somehow bring acceptance you are dead wrong. the only thing you will achieve is the opposite, and make fiction as shunned as the real thing.
>>747600096This is a good analogy. It cuts to the core issue: the fictional nature of the object doesn't change the nature of the attraction. If you're sexually aroused by depictions of males, that's homosexual attraction regardless of whether they're drawings.>>747600663This is a reasonable counterargument. It's true that fiction-specific attractions exist. People are aroused by things in 2D that are physically impossible, grotesque, or unappealing in reality. The brain can easily compartmentalize "this works as a drawing" from "this would be horrifying in real life." We see the same thing in violent video games; enjoying depictions of violence (a natural human affinity) in fiction does not mean that you want violence in real life.However, this argument has a critical weakness because childlike features do exist in reality. The traits that make a loli character appealing (small stature, neoteny, undeveloped proportions) are real traits of real children. The object of attraction isn't a fantasy that can't exist; it's a stylized version of something that absolutely does exist.So the "it only works in 2D" defense works when the 2D thing has no real-world analog. It's much weaker when the 2D thing is a stylized depiction of something real.The counter might be: "But the anime art style is so abstracted that it doesn't read as 'child' but instead is just 'anime aesthetic.'" That is potentially worth considering, but it raises the question: if you removed the childlike proportions and replaced them with adult ones, would the attraction remain? If not, the art style isn't what's doing the work; the childlike features are.
>>747601450>it's not about admitting anything. it's about communication.You make a good point about collapsing "loli" and "pedophile" muddying a conversation. Context certainly matters, and it makes sense to get frustrated if someone misinterprets your statements. But I only even brought it up in the first place because >>747588625 implied that "loli" and "pedophilia" aren't the same, so please don't put that onus on me.>i am well aware of what i'm into, but i don't feel the need to tell everyone and talk about it, especially not on a video game board.So do you want to say "i like lolis" or not?>somehow bring acceptanceI never argued for this. I was saying that honest labeling is a prerequisite for responsible self-management. I think that anyone who tries to push the narrative otherwise is causing real harm.>Thanks to retards like youPlease don't blame inappropriate conflation on the people *naming* the thing rather than the thing itself. If the terms are genuinely congruent, the discomfort that causes (to yourself or others) isn't a problem with the people like me who are pointing it out, it's a problem with the reality of the situation.I get the feeling you are saying "I know what it is, just leave me alone about it" which I also understand, but claiming that calling a horse a horse will "make things worse" is a stretch.
>>747602850>implied that "loli" and "pedophilia" aren't the sameNot all rectangles are squares
>>747604412If you jerk it to drawings of dudes fucking dudes, you are gay.If you jerk it to drawings of children, you are a pedophile.There are two squares.
>>747604594You are jerking off to a representation of X doesn't mean X is your orientation. You can be attracted to the scenario or to an idealized form of X rather than X in reality.
>>747584405I like lolicon but find real kids disgusting and repulsive
>>747584405I've decided to play through every Kirby game that's available on the switch. I guess that means I'll have to get Kirby Fighters
Baraag artist recommendations?
>>747604725>I like loliconKinda gayDo you mean you like "lolis?"
>>747602850whether it is the same or not solely depends on the individual. there are many fantasies people have that they don't want to act out even if they get hard just thinking about it. if you want to do that shit irl, it's the same to you, but if you don't, it's not.i want everyone to be able to say it. whether they like it because they like real kids or not shouldn't even be something that is brought up. because it doesn't matter when the topic is video games.being honest with yourself ≠ telling everyone "hey btw i'm also a real pedo heehee" when you talk about fictional characters, even if you are literally saying you want to fuck this child character.what i'm saying is every one who feels the need to bring up real life when the topic is fiction needs to be gutted. whether it's a moralfag crying 'muh literal child' or a pedo going 'uoh literal child'.
>>747605086Yeah sorry I meant like lolis. I just conflated the two terms
>>747604995>baraag>liking westernslopShow me a single piece of artwork of her done by a westoid that looks decent.
>>747600118I feel like this is okay to post, there isnt nothing there
>>747606473It has the outline of a nipple
>>747604720This argument falls apart if you remove childlike traits from the material; if it loses the appeal, then the appeal was the childlike traits.>>747605101>whether it is the same or not solely depends on the individualThis is exactly the dangerous misconception I want to dispel. If someone is aroused by childlike features, that's pedophilic attraction regardless of whether they'd act on it. You are conflating attraction with intent to act, which are two separate things. My original argument already conceded this distinction.To clarify: lolicon = pedophile ≠ child molester.I don't like dissuading the honest discussion of the topic, but as to whether it's appropriate to discuss in the context of video games? Well, that's just the sort of turn this thread took as a result of these posts>>747584529>>747587974>>747589907
>>747605434
>>747588082This.
>>747584405wow her thighs are so fat they are overflowing
>>747607343>the appeal was the childlike traitsThis still does constitute an orientation. My point stands.
>>747599263Magolor´s twist was okay in 2000s, but they cant repeat the same trick again. in Rainbow Curse (2015), Elline barely exist in marketing material, they are planning a major role for the fairy in the new game.
>>747608843Counterpoint: The games are for kids and kids don't know any better
What are the essential Kirby games to play?
>>747609039All of the mainline games. The side stuff like mass attack, ball drawing ones, pinball, etc can be skipped.
>>747609195Ok thank you
>>747607616>This still does constitute an orientation.I'm assuming you meant to write "still doesn't" here. I'm not sure what point you're trying to make by reiterating that it is an "orientation" but you can call it whatever you want. My claim isn't about the word "orientation." It's that the attraction to childlike physical features in lolicon and the attraction to childlike physical features in pedophilia are the same attraction. Someone's fap material directly reflects their actual sexual preferences, whether they are realistic or not.
>>747610090Attraction to the aesthetic or roleplay of being a pedophile is not the same as actual, diagnosable pedophilic attraction. If you don't intend to say that lolicons are attracted to real kids, then you are misusing the term "pedophile," which is a clinical term denoting a pattern of attraction to REAL children, and their physical characteristics IN REAL LIFE. You're misusing a clinical term.You can argue it involves pedophilia, but it does not meet the clinical qualifications of pedophilia.
>>747587974
>>>/b/953788118
>>747613580Wrong Nintendo franchise
Unfortunately the more I look at her the more it looks like she's wearing shorts, but making them the same color as her skin sure is a weird choice
>>747612453I blame nintendo for giving me a mob face fetish
>>747584631It's actually insane how Nintendo has decided that literally everything should be open world now. Honestly I'm surprised that Rhythm Heaven wasn't somehow turned into one
>>747584405>What’s the appeal?Legs.
bump
>>747584405Kirbyfags are mentally ill and nintendo should pay for its crimes against humanity
>>747610532You're assuming that because 'pedophile' has a clinical definition, no one can use it unless they're handing down a medical diagnosis. That's not how language works. The actual clinical definition describes a pattern of attraction to childlike physical characteristics (not in real people or imaginary people specifically). If someone's sexual attraction centers on the depiction of childlike bodies (and you've already conceded that the appeal is the childlike traits) then the nature of that attraction is pedophilic regardless of the medium. You're trying to use the clinical nature like some semantic escape hatch to avoid naming what the attraction actually is.And to be clear, no lolicon is attracted to 'the aesthetic of being a pedophile.' They're attracted to the depiction of a childlike body. That's the content. That's the attraction. It's not roleplay or aesthetic, it's the body being depicted. Don't mischaracterize what we are actually talking about here: loli porn.
>>747623976>no one can use it unless they're handing down a medical diagnosisWhat you're admitting by saying this is that you're inventing your own definition of the word and then using that to try to smear people. There's already an agreed upon definition of the word and it's used by people with more qualifications than yourself, so choosing to arbitrarily redefine the word only signifies that you're enough of a cunt to misuse a term in order to then arbitrarily apply it as a smear. You are saying more about yourself than the people you're attempting to stigmatize.
>>747615024They do have a lot of simple-faced girls in their lineup.
>>747624567That wasn't an invented definition, that's the DSM-5 definition. Look it up.
>>747584529>pedos How can you tell she's underage?
Which Kirby games should I play to become a Kirby larper
>>747584405Floating onahole
