>Light temple is in>Ice Temple is in>TP's hidden skills are in>Medallion spells are in>Unfreezing Zora's domain is in>Sword beam is inYou have no reason not to buy the remake
>>747617404Source?
>>747617404If you only they could have hinted at any form of new content in the direct.... but they didn't because there isn't any
>>747617690>If you only they could have hinted at any form of new content in the directIt's supposed to be a surprise.
>>747617404What makes you believe these?
The sad thing is there will be at leas 1 dumbass that will believe you
>>747617404Source: my uncle that works in nintendo.
>>747617404Its still a game with mechanics from 1996, i played the original when it came out and it was ass then, we just loved it because it was fuckin zelda in 3d for the first time.
>>747617404I didn't hear you say anything about being able to beat running man in a foot race or a unicorn fountain. Also I don't have a Switch 2 and they just went up in price and I'm not buy one for one game I already own 2 copies of and can play on pc.
>forest jews sell that shitty shield for 40 rupees
>>747617404>You have no reason not to buy the remake
>>747618403>Its still a game with mechanics from 1996The gameplay was updated
>>747619108Wow take my 80 dollars nintendo!!!!!!!!!!!!! A JUMP BUTTON WOW
>>747619157The game is $60
>>747617585Trust me
Erhem: the designs are based on puppets because miyamoto once had them at a birthday party.NOW ALL CRITICISM IS FOREVER INVALID. PLEASE PURCHASE.
>>747619728>a literal dude trust meSo you're full of shit
>>747617690I do find it weird we’ve seen none of the temple of time at all. If there’s a surprise, I think one will be there.
I like the red tunic collar.
>>747619826The criticism is invalid because you people argue in bad faith.
>>747620462Shills are incapable of arguing in good faith, so that's rich coming from you.
there wont be anything that big added, some of the dungeons will probably be slightly adjusted to have more interesting pathways or shortcuts to make navigating them quicker. i doubt we'll get zora's domain back but there might be more dialogue about it or maybe there'll be some rescued npcs but that's about it
>>747620714>no u
>>747620931You've never been able to counter any criticism of the game. You always deflect to whataboutisms, non sequitors, or when you're really desperate, you pull out sales and pre-orders and other appeals to popularity.So no, it's not a simple "no u".
>>747618359This but my uncle unironically works at nintendie
But is the gameplay good?
>>747617404I've seen these exact things suggested in Hopes Fears Expectations threads for this game before the Direct happened.Genius-level bait, anon.
>>747620973>say you argue in bad faith (because you do)>n-no YOU argue in bad faith>it's not a simple "no u".Sure buddy.
>>747617806Nah, and we'd be lucky if at least Master Quest is included.
The big question is was this originally an $80 game that they got spooked by and lowered it to $60 or is it $60 because it's basically just the DS game with a graphics update and minor changes?
>>747621317Then please, point to a bad faith criticism.
>>747617404I think this is the only thing that could get me to buy this heaping pile of garbage
>>747617404none of that is in though
>>747621324Master Quest won't be included in the base content.It will be added with the free update, announced in the January Nintendo Direct.
>>747622716Prove it
>>747623197Snopes confirmed it.
I got banned for 2 days for saying the OoT remake looks goodThis place is such a shithole now goddamn
>>747622161>it's garbage because it doesn't look like shit like the game I played during my childhoodOk boomer.
