[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/v/ - Video Games


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1789266147905691m.jpg (175 KB, 910x1024)
175 KB JPG
What the hell has SONY been doing for the past 6 YEARS!
>>
>>747646410
>What the hell has SONY been doing for the past 6 YEARS!
26 years* the brand been dogshit after the ps2
>>
>>747646410
Absolutely Jack Diddly Squat!
>>
>>747646410
It's real simple. Nintendo recognises restraint, keeping their budgets manageable and their scope within reason. If a game doesn't meet sales expectations, that's fine, because other investments will pick up the slack.
Sony, on the other hand, throws a genuinely inhumane amount of money and dev time at projects that, if they fail, are liable to bring down the whole damn dev team with them.
>>
>>747646532
The PS3 was alright.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.