.
>>747676552fuck I always forget how bad Oot looks
>>747676752It makes sense...N64 was really weak. About saturn levels of power but it traded detail for things like antialiasing and texture filtering. Was it worth it? Meh...hard to say. It ran games really poorly too.
>>747676552
>>747676921me on the left btw, the original has been supplanted
that's the single most soulful screenshot ive ever seen
>>747676552Yeah it needs DLSS5, volumetric fog, and the ability to see links every pore so I can stare at it all and dilate instead of playing the game
>>747676752It gets hidden a lot with really good camera work and lighting during cutscenes. Good direction will always beat fidelity.
>>747676552bro where's the anti soul gas and dlss5??
>>747677151...If we're talking about a movie
>>747676552Hey look it's this thread. Again. For the fifth time this week.
>>747677392More like fifth time today
>>747676552>>747676752Zoomers have no soul
>>747676552I mean... you have to try really hard to ruin that right?
>>747680947The remake has more soul, Navi dances to each song differently, and you can hum into the microphone to play them. What does the original have, reused assets from Mario 64? good luck with that you soulless freak.
>>747676552Gamers don't think video games are art, just toys that have to be fixed and repainted from time to time
Those stupid Zoomers dont know they are going to play the same game havent they seen the Star Fox 64 Remake?
>zoomers zoomer zoomiessssIt's millenial uncs who buy these remake slops the most.
