[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/v/ - Video Games


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 550x748[1].jpg (107 KB, 550x748)
107 KB JPG
Why did the Settlers series die?
And why was number 3 the best one?
>>
Looks comfy
I think it's another case of "good game but bad <series> game"
>>
The series lost all direction after 4. 2 - 4 are the best.

Also, this track is ingrained in my soul
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Hba44D9kRc
>>
>>747688305
I think Settlers 7 was a good coming back to form but it was too competetive-focused for retards like me.
>>
Should I replay 3 or 4?



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.