Is Darksiders good?
>>748937909No but it's bad in a way that kicks ass. 1's fun, 2's jankier but fun, 3's pretty shit but allegedly is better than it was at release, Genesis is fun.
>>748937909It's too riddled with flaws to be called good, but i love it.
>>748937909I liked the second one
>>748937909Only the second game is worth playing imo because you get to play as edgekino death, the eldest and strongest of the horsemen
>>748937909The first one is good as an edgy legend of ZeldaEvery game after fucking sucks, no 2 isnt good and Death is an annoying quippy redditor
>>748937909It's pretty good.
>>748937909I'm playing through Darksiders 1 since I never did when it released way back when. Dear god, I think I like the combat system. It has just enough depth and fluidity to it that you can cancel any attack during the wind up but have to commit after that, multiple ways to juggle enemies, aerial attacks, and the Chaos mode can be used often enough that you can use it regularly for moment to moment gameplay as well. Downside is that the bosses are such nothing burgers by comparison that I killed the Greiver and didn't even notice it was a boss until after War ripped its heart out. Compared to some recent "action" games just copying the usual souls combat of R1 and dodge spam, this feels refreshingly new.
>>748937909First is good, if very derivative.Didn't get far into 2 because it felt padded, but it's a lot of people's favorite.3 is very mid and the hardest one (to its detriment).
I just played Genesis, it was better than I was expecting. Darksiders 2 is still my favorite for it’s setting, though.
1 is a GoW clone with a few puzzles here and there. Not bad but uninteresting.2 is mechanically better but it drags on forever and has retarded diablo loot so I never finished it.
>>748937909I liked all 3 desu.
>>748937909>darksiders 1pretty good despite being an edgelord war is kind of a wet fart personality wise >darksiders 2same as 1 but more ambitious not by much though. i liked the separate worlds you get to go through and death is surprisingly funny like he doesn't take much seriously. it has an ok start but if you stick with it, it gets good.
>>748937909I bought the book and read it while pulling an all nighter and it's actually very well written. DS2 one of those games I replay every few years or so
>>748937909An example of style over substance not being a bad thing.
>>748937909Both are solid 7.5/10 action adventure that falls of during the last section of the game.
>>748937909I remember the second one being padded to "legally distinct" hell and back. Just hours and hours of collecting 3 of specific bullshit A to open up path B.
Darksiders I é disparado um dos meus jogos favoritos! Cara é muito bom, a história e o sistema de batalha, porém o Darksiders II e III são horriveis! Pra falar a verdade, nunca joguei o II e o III, mas vi a gameplay, e o I ganha disparado.
>>748937909it gets the job done.3 is the weakest one.
>>748937909>no, not alone
>>748937909not really
>>748937909"From the creator of Spawn" should be a warning, not a draw
2 was a lot of fun. Classic puzzle dungeons and expressive arcade combat. Death’s great too, very charismatic
>>748939853>3 is very mid and the hardest one (to its detriment).they really didn't need to half-ass lean into souls only to take it out with patches because fans wanted a more familiar combat setup. fury is also kind of a second-grade character.
Hell yeah, I've yet to play Genesis but all 3 are great in their own way(s).
>>748944643It's really solid, my main gripe is that solo players really needed a smoother way to transition between War and Strife. The game itself is definitely different from the others but feels good and has some cool maps.
>>7489379091 and especially 2 is great, the way animation is done in 3 looks very weird though and you play as a woman *eugh*
