Developer of 343/halo studios admits only people who agree to say nice things about their games got copies of halo remake to review. This means people like ggmanLives who glazed that pile of shit are confirmed shills
>>748953863He did the same for Starfield. Never trust anything that fucking shill faggot spouts.
>>748953863The company deliberately only sending codes to people who already liked their games isn't proof of those people being shills or that they were aware that only other fans recieved codes
Humans are Forerunners.
>Gmanshills
>>748953863wasn't this one kind of negative. Anyway hes fun to listen to so whatever. Mortismal is more serious if thats what you are looking for. You know he is because he even stood by his review of The Veilguard as everyone started shitting on him
>youtube ad / ネグロ / niggeruwho cares, what about the game?
>>748953863>Shillmanlives
>>748953863Just like The Coalition then
>>748953863>Developer of 343/halo studios admitssource on this claim?
The same thing that happened to the overall credibility of the journo as an industry will happen to the credibility of the Youtube eceleb as a whole
>>748953863MCC didn't go on sale, I'm sad.
>>748953863He praised Fallout 76 only because you can play with friends and dont have to talk to boring npcs
>>748955346You are subhuman
>>748957056Pretty much this. Aging millennials with a family to feed will agree to shill whatever pays the most, because they only care how to make more money and because they know that this is not a job but a gig that has an expiration date. Its a tale as old as time. If you are a consumer, you just skip these shills and you find someone with objective opinions
>>748958512Arent opinions by nature not objective
>>748953863In a way, I liked this guy's videos that did not agree with the majority. As in, it is almost impossible for everyone to either like or dislike and remain genuine. Some people like it, some do not, but to tell me that everyone's natural, genuine opinion is the same is unreal. So it felt natural for someone to just say I liked/disliked this game regardless of what the majority said. Then I watched his videos and understood that his talking points are read out, pre approved by corpos, peaking shilling and not even trying. From what he says, how he says it, with what ideas he follows, an impressive order of things instead of random approaches of what you remember after your playthrough etc. He is a fucking retard who has the opinion that will bring him cash and free codes. I prefer a grifter to him, at least the former doesn't pretend to be what he is not. Eat shit faggot.
>>748959259Sure by definition, but I think what anon meant was unbiased opinions.
>>748959259Well yeah, there is always an unavoidable touch of personal opinion when you deliver the news. However, when you keep glazing a company/product and you either find no wrongs or always softball the bad news, it means that you are shilling. Thats what Dood and Justing wong, do these days, when it comes to capcom mostly. Thats also what gmanlives does occasionally with some big game reviews. >Whats objective opinions thenAn objective opinion consists of you having adequate knowledge about the subject you are talking about, and also you identifying and separate/tone down your biases in order to be as close to the truth as possible when you deliver the news.
Well yeah no shit. There are people on here who needed confirmation that this is how things work? You can tell who's old enough to remember the Kane and Lynch fiasco and who isn't.
>>748953863>ShillmanShills glazes Gaylo/Starfield>F-FUCK OFF ASSHOLE SHILL>ShillmanShills shits on Wolverine>BASED!! IT'S OVER FOR SNOYS!!Pick a lane.
>>748955394I don't understand that picture very well but it looks like concentrated cancer.
