[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
▼ Settings Mobile Home
/v/ - Video Games


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


Why do normies and moralfags oppose AI tecnology, yet find animations and faces created via mocap perfectly acceptable?

In the past, animations had to be done manually, and faces had to be created and modeled by artists manually too.
also mocap is uncanny like AI too, and the facial scans remain terrible with few exceptions
>>
The AIjeets are particularly uppity today. What's going on?
>>
>>748989737
The only reason normalfags hate AI is because they believe it will steal their job and make them feel bad that a machine can do things better than them.
>>
>>748989737
they are NPCs brainwashed
>>
>>748990017
>>748989737
you are not getting ubi and the machine god won't help you
>>
>>748990004
Anthropic is burning
>>
File: images.jpg (39 KB, 495x404)
39 KB JPG
>>748990004
I’m not particularly in favor of AI. It just strikes me as hypocritical that one thing is viewed positively while the other is considered the worst thing to ever happen to humanity.
In any case, I wish they’d stop using mocap at least for the faces
>>
>>748989737
>find animations and faces created via mocap perfectly acceptable?
no one does though, especially not after vulvarine
>>
>>748989737
Both sides already chose their positions and will die on their own gay hills. You won't convert anti AI crowd and the anti-AI crowd won't scare the pro-AI crowd.

Just do what you want and let both sides whine about it, you won't convince anyone from the other side and viceversa.

>>748990004
White transsexual hands typed this, post hands, sars.
>>
>>748989737
Because it still requires a person to carry out the actions that end up represented in the mocap data and scans.
You're capturing someone's actual movements and acting or a real object's likeness.
It does have its downsides, like all tools it removes a degree of artistic intent, like when cartoons moved from hand drawn to digital with motion tweening.
>>
>>748991534
>You won't convert anti AI crowd
this happens constantly
>>
>>748989737
>>748990496
Mocap is garbage and I don't know anyone who actually likes it, but at least it's done by humans
>>
>>748989737
>yet find animations and faces created via mocap perfectly acceptable?
Because faces emoting = good. Look at all the popular movies/shows these days, it's just people obsessing over actors making meme faces
>>
>>748989737
>why are people OK with the wheel but not with the Perpetual Energy Machine Powered By Raping Babies??? they're both things that do things, so it seems pretty strange to me!
>>
>>748993473
>Perpetual Energy Machine Powered By Raping Babies
Most sane anti-AI schizo



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.