[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
▼ Settings Mobile Home
/v/ - Video Games


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: jvc.jpg (2.69 MB, 4032x3024)
2.69 MB JPG
Should you always play the original release first or are there times when you should just skip it?
>>
>>749019187
Yes. No.
>>
Yes, but it's fine to choose the definitive version of the original game in question
For example, I'm not playing RE1 with no autoaim over RE1 Director's Cut
>>
There's like literally 0 point of playing any DOS fps game over a modern sourceport/remaster.
>>
>>749019187
The only time you should play a game's remake first is when you don't realize it's a remake because you're just a young feller and you don't know any better so you play that version and then years later you look it up and learn about the original and go back and play that and think to yourself how much better it is and decide to stick with that one going forward.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.