>>749020545
always was
requirements:
be high IQ
be not brown

Hating Starfield unironically is like hating a book beyond your reading level because you literally can't grasp it.

>>749020545
It's the greatest load screen simulator that has ever been developed. Don't let the haters tell you different. They just need to incorporate the ad technology when there is a load screen and it'd be perfect.

>>749020840
>>749020906
i honestly loved it day 1.
not a lot of games ever scratched that itch of being out in spacy in your comfy spaceship and also blowing pirates to smithereens

>>749020840
This but somewhat unironically. Wiggers and browns that can only play gun and ball or general multiplayer shit always hated bethesda titles, Starfield is no different

i knew starfield was going to be good when the only criticism to manifest over three fucking years was the same three potato images from the same troon ritualposter

>>749020545
Never was, never will be.

>>749020545
always was
requirements:
be low iq (barely enough to classify as being alive)
be brown (in skin colour or spirit)

bump!

Their general thread keeps dying. Even the people who like it have nothing good to say about it

>>749020840
but this game was most successful in india

>>749020545
>Is the turd finally shiny?

>>749021112
But Starfield is a gun&ball game tho

>>749020545
It is definitely a game of all time. This is beyond dispute.

>>749021112
Bethesda games are quintessential ball and gun

File: ack.jpg (138 KB, 685x685)

138 KB JPG

>>749021123
This.
Starfield is great but it should have been under its own spinoff studio to avoid Eldertroons getting so assblasted about Todd's priorities.

no and never will be

>>749025075
>>749025137
Yes a slowburn RPG and call of duty totally has the same audience

>>749021028
starfield was great on launch and is much better now
the criticism has always been more schizophrenic than organic

>>749020545
Games are never 'made good'.
What happens is, a game reaches a critical mass of issues on launch and people start nitpicking what is probably a 7/10 (derogatory) game to hell and back over stuff they wouldn't normally care that much about.
Then, after a while, if the devs stay engaged with a stockholm syndrom fanbase and fix a couple of often meaningless bugs that were particularly high profile, people then pretend the game has a whole new lease on life and the formerly hated 7/10 game becomes a cult fanbase 7/10 that the only people still talking about all say is great, but it's still the same game.
Happened with cyberpunk, happened with NMS, I don't know if it happened to starfield (the people pretending it's good), but it's definitely likely. Happens with other media too, like the star wawrs prequels.

Good content would shine through the bullshit hate on things from the start, and the core foundation can never be fixed after release, so the whole 'hate' phase just never happens for good things. It doesn't mean the things are bad, and often don't warrant the hate they do get on launch, but it doesn't mean they're worth playing/watching either.