>Make an on topic thread about about an old snes fighting game with wonky controls, wondering what /v/ thought of it>0 replies (one if I'm lucky)>Someone else makes a blatant ragebait thread ("Hurr durr this popular thing actually sucks" "chuds lost" etc.)>300+ replies
>>749202438go talk about games with your friends, simple as
I was almost tempted to not reply just to troll you,my brother in Christ THIS IS 4CHAN! what the fuck were you expecting?
Half the time it's just the kid samefagging the first few posts to rope people in.t. knower
Isn't this just survivorship bias at play?
>>749202624>t. knowermore like DOERt.knower AND doer
>>749202438Now to derail
>>749202438Bitch, no one played your shovelware fighting game.
>>749202728Me on the right
/v/ only responds to>twitter threads>coom threads>daily ritual posts like the nintendo being the most successful gaming industry mods are to blame for this btw
>>749202438You're supposed to reply to yourself with your phone and say something combative and retarded.Then get in a fake fight with yourself until the thread has enough replies for others to be interested.There's no IP count anymore so nobody but you and the mods know.
>>749202438>Make an on topic thread about about an old snes fighting game with wonky controlsFighting games only work properly with people to play against. How are you supposed to get people into a janky one from 30 years ago?
>>749202438I have never once said "don't reply to bait". Went would I want to get less (you)s? Think seriously, OP
>>749204375good morning saars
Best way to do it is to have filters, I will share one/vegans?/
>>749203794>mods are to blame for this btwthey actively encourage it by only deleting the threads after 500 replies so they can claim the rules are actually followed
replying to bait is fun but only if you are original and kool and not like the retards who would say dont reply to bait because theyre in fact low iq
