>tfw trying to play vidya with 8gb VRAM
>>750164929WIFE
>>750164929Work well for everything before 2020
2.0 gb is enough for a ton of games (basically anything up to 2007 and beyond)
>>750164929>Misaggers
HOW MANY OFF TOPIC THREAD WILL YOU MAKE?FUCK OFF BACK TO >>>/a/
>bought a card with lots of vram>never upgrade my normal ram because thought prices would always be the same>now have more vram than normal ram
>>750166312Should've applied for janny anon
>>750164929Windows skill issue
>>750164929I have 8 y/o computer: 16gb ram, gtx 1050ti 4gb and unless it will die form natural causes I will never replace it.
>>750165241>2007GTX 960 from 2015 had 2 GB of VRAM.
>>750164929It works.
>>750164929Why yes I do run 0.5GB VRAM games on 96GB VRAM, how could you tell?
>>750164929just don't play the latest AAA jeetware and you'll be okalso if you MUST, try DLSS.and you don't need textures on VERY ULTRA MAX, retard
>>750167294but do you run 48 0.5GB VRAM games?
What gets me is that all these games look marginally better and have less physics interaction than say crisis, there's no reason they can't optimize for 8 gigs, especially now that we are being priced out of hardwarez
>>750164929She looks like she fucks electricity users.
>>750168087
>>750167406you can't tell me what to do. you're not my really sexy and hot mom
Works fine in my PC.
>>750167893>physics interaction>vramretard
>>750167406dlss eats vram and being forced down to lower res textures can significantly hurt visuals while providing no performance
>>750169270self-mogged to the extreme
