>>750238934
problem with this is AI is programmed to make you win all the time. It's not gonna put you into a scenario where you "lose" unless you tell it to.

>>750239005
Not at all. This card and preset I'm using(made by sillytavern adaptaions) is so creul and it does not play around rules. If it doesn't fit, he rejects it and even if I try to argue with him he never listens even in a way that I feel he is so stubborn.
https://rentry.org/sillytavernadaptations
here is a link so you can check it out

>>750239084
>>750238934
I use Crushon.AI for this sort of RP and it's probably way too expensive.
Can you use older models of Claude (4.6 Sonnet is one I really liked) with Sillytavern? Also how expensive would that be, approximately?

>>750240093
I recommend using deepseek. It's cheaper and surprisingly smart and reliable
I think you could use claude but it censors like hell and can't do some lewd shit..
I don't use claude so I don't know how expensive it is

>>750240176
On the platform I use I have Deepseek v4 which is pretty good compared to the older one which was only really good for shitpost RPs.
Sonnet 4.6, Opus 4.7, 4.8 and 4.9 are honestly miles ahead of Deepseek.
They're all NSFW but to be fair, I only do Marvel 616 RPs and I don't really ERP. Still, it's good to have the ability to do violence or sex if I want.

If it's DS v4 you're using though yeah, I agree - it's a very competent DM. GLM 4.6 is another good one and they won't necessarily lean in to a power fantasy as >>750239005
says.

>>750240176
I use claude in the web setting this up with my own dungeon master skill and it can do NSFW. You have to jailbreak it or set it from Sonnet 5.5 to 4.7. I like that Claude 5.5 is really insane at tracking everything and keeping a coherent storyline for the campaign. What I typically do is tell Claude to create a sealed document with all the events they will plan and details and I just don't read it to not spoil myself. So it has an outline to work from and have a coherent story.