[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
▼ Settings Mobile Home
/v/ - Video Games


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: images.jpg (45 KB, 480x640)
45 KB JPG
Bloodborne or DS3? Let's settle this.
>>
>>750251305
Bloodborn was a better constructed game even if I didn't care for it much.
I don't like playing as DPS focused speedsters in souls games, so BB and Sekiro were not my cup of tea. Enemy placement, variety, weapon viability, etc were peak with BB and I can't deny it. Every single main weapon handled different and were all viable weapons from start to end in BB and that's something I cannot say for DeS or DS games at all.
>>
Bloodborn contains many gameplay additions that were absent from DS3. Which leads to my theory that they dont want to make more better games but instead more popular games.
>>
>>750251305
BB>Sekiro>DeS>DaSII>Elden Ring>DaS>DaSIII
>>
>>750254426
Sekito needs to be lower
>>
File: prison.jpg (39 KB, 480x266)
39 KB JPG
Don't drop the soap
>>
>>750254462
Why?
>>
DS3 is over hated, the only reason Bloodborne is better is because they departed from the same old medieval theme and same weapons
>>
>>750251305
BB=Sekiro>the rest (I never played the rest)
>>
>>750254517
>better aesthetic
>better lore
>better boss fights
>better weapons
>hot doll chick
better in every way
>>
>>750254591
You played the best two so I wouldn't worry about it.
>>
>>750254501
I never finished it because I couldn't overlevel to destroy bosses. Shit game
>>
>>750254501
Stamina meters were the worst addition to the games formula, also it goes too hard into the weeb references. Like really did they have to make their ninja wear orange just like Naruto?
>>
>>750251305
DS3. BB has a awful boss roster and the first half is boring. DS3 fix a lot of issues from BB
>>
>>750254628
Based. I'll continue to pass on the others. When I heard that the fat retard from ASOIAF was writing the story of elden ring I was interested but from what I've heard about it, it sucks, the story I mean.
>>
>>750254883
No one cares about story in Souls games
>>
File: 13610376174189412352_144.jpg (735 KB, 3840x1600)
735 KB JPG
>>750251305
DaS2chad here, after beating Bloodborne a few days ago I can confirm DaS3 is better.
>1: sustain is over-tuned in BB
You can brute force every fight in the game while making tons of mistakes, It's braindead enough that it almost feels closer to DS1 with havels than to the relatively punishing DS3.
>2: Your character is too powerful in BB
To the extent you end up beating every enemy the same way, massively shrinking perceived enemy variety. Big enemies can be staggered now, and small enemies can be chain-stunned easier than ever. You never truly have to respect enemies in this game, so they all blend together.
>3: Bosses are considerably worse
Mostly because your character in BB is strong enough to faceroll them all.
>4: Less build variety
Self explanatory.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.