Will gaming ever get any new and exciting technological advancements again or has it already reached the point of stagnation?
>>750276581just give me a good story with decent gameplay
>>750276581Have you seen DLSS 5?The next technological jump will be AI slop.
The people making games now don't even think you need to make them appealing to customers or sell a lot of copies, why would they try to push the tech envelope?
The next big tech leap is plugging AI into NPC behavior with game systems feeding it parameters.
It reached the point of stagnation a decade ago. That's why modern graphics are so hyperfixated on gimmick shit like gay tracing and fake AI frames
>>750276581brain chip gaming, like the Black Mirror episode
>>750276581>has it already reached the point of stagnation
>>750277186>muh graphicsadvancements can be made in other areas
>>750277186This is a fucking stupid image. The increased triangle count could go towards adding more hair detail, for example.
>>750277395I see you're clearly retarded, so let me fucing spoonfeed you my point.They need to go BACK. There's nothing left to "advance" in any meaningful way. They can dump millions of dollars into a game and get a fucking 5% "improvement" in just about any given asset and STILL flop harder than an old lady falling down the stairs.FUCK THE GRAPHICS, GO BACK.
>>750277643>retard noisesI swear to god, you graphics whores are worse than leftists when it comes to pretending not to understand shit.
>>750277679>hasn't designed a game>is an expert on game designclassic Kruger
>>750276581VR, and i mean actual VR like SAO or something like that is the next milestone. Sadly VR is still stuck in shitty tech demos meme simulators
>>750277679so graphics have peaked, gaming can be advanced in other areas. you should be concerned you cant think of what those areas are.
>>750277814I know how diminishing returns work and I know that "realistic graphics" are inversely proportional to how well a game stands the test of time. Stylization beats "realism" in literally every case.Now cry about it, graphics whores.
>>750277930"Realistic graphics" are inversely proportional to how well a game stands the test of time.WE. NEED. TO. GO. BACK. DO WANT 120 DOLLAR GAMES? BECAUSE THIS IS HOW YOU GET THEM.Fucking retards.
>>750277186guaranteed_replies.png
>>750278127Go be a retarded troll somewhere else.
>>750277738subdivision modifier doesn't create detail, it just multiplies your quads
>>750278245Obvious troll is obvious.
>>750276867i actually agree with this. People will realize nobody wants AI generated slop, but would LOVE believable AI running NPC behavior. This is the next big step.
>>750278063>Realistic graphics" are inversely proportional to how well a game stands the test of time.ehhhh, that's not really true anymore. Plenty of games from 8-10 years ago with "realistic" graphics still look really good.
>>750276581Reached the point of stagnation during the PS2. Gaming really hasn't evolved after that gen. The follow up consoles offered prettier graphics for the same type of gaming experiences alongside horrible ideas like DLC and online bullshit. Gaming has been dead since the PS2 era ended. Anyone who disagrees is a brainlet.The real question is, will gamers ever wise up? Going by how gaming has continued to sell great gamers are dumb addicts.
>>750278325Wrong. Cope. Seethe. Cry.Stylization will ALWAYS stand the test of time and realism will ALWAYS fail it.
>>750277930gaming doesn't need to be "advanced"it was fine 30 years ago in the 90sfuck off jew
>>750278489This. Thank you.
>>750276581We hit the peak ages ago. Graphics literally cannot get any better, given we're already at photorealism, and actual gameplay can't really go anywhere else at this point - everything's been done in some form or another.
>>750276581Im playing GZ right now and its insane how advanced the game fells for how old it itsIts almost 12 years now and it still fells like it could have come out right nowAlso how do i S-Rank the side ops?i tried everything and dont know what to do anymoreI rescued all the pows and only killed the two renegades but i still fail
>>750278797>only killed the two renegades but i still failuse tranq qun. you need NOT to kill, and try to alerts and fast
>>750278452>WrongNah, just look at RDR2.
It feels like we're regressing>20 years ago, Uncharted would animate Nate walking up individual stairs. Now Wolverine simply glides up stairs completely disconnected from the environment with his legs conveniently out frame>used to be able to get crystal clear native resolution. Now image quality sucks with forced image upscaling that kills texture quality and causes smearing>In modern games, if you spin the analog stick the character simply spazs out rather than animating them running in a circleA lot of this is caused by a lack of attention to detail. Which is a problem in and of itself because it means devs can't be bothered to give a shit
>>750278797>Also how do i S-Rank the side ops?no kills, no alerts, speedrun
>>750280565A lot of the talent left the industry for better pay explains that.
