>>750295203
you shouldnt eat people
too much microplastics

>>750295203
y tho?

>>750295807
hunger (fear too)

>>750295203
>she
Who?
Cute gif
I like cute things and cute girls (but I'm racist)

>>750296124
her name is the girl

>>750296594
and you can have a wholesome marriage with her

>>750297345
don't you need a mod for that

>>750297519
it's about as canon a mod as you can get, even miro had a meltdown over it and said he would eventually implement parts of it in an update, but never did

>>750297634
>Miro said he would update the game to let you have sex with a child
Uh... I don't know about that. And how would it be canon? She turns into the God of Fear and Hunger, not some shambling monster because you wanted to wet your willy lmao

>>750298906
I do, I saw his meltdown post
?
I'm not saying that's her canon end, simply as close to canon to the game itself as possible. you can literally feed her to an orgy monster or have her die in a number of horrific ways in the game and none of that is canon to her ending

>>750299301
So you mean its canon as in it just fits the game? I mean, I guess, but just because it makes sense to the setting, I'm gonna go out on a limb and say no game should include child rape. Call me crazy ig

>>750299486
the game already includes it, you can sell the girl to pocketcat as a slave he proceeds to rape
in termina, a priest forms a marriage with multiple babies

>>750299689
Pocketcat doesn't rape anybody, nor is that even implied. The only hostile thing you see him do is beat someone he has in a sack.
>in termina, a priest forms a marriage with multiple babies
If you're referring to the fact that an unused sprite of Father Hugo that has him melded with a cherub, that was unused. It's also a different thing to imply that may have happened, and actually show it happening on screen, especially if the player character is the one actually doing it.

>>750300016
>nor is that even implied
it is strongly implied, he rubs his dick when you give her to him and if you refuse to he says you're denying him pleasure
>The only hostile thing you see him do is beat someone he has in a sack.
which is almost certainly a child, which is what he trades in
I also don't understand how people can consider anything else that happens to the girl in tis game morally acceptable when it's all heinous, but make a cutoff and sex, that's some potent cognitive dissonance

>>750300016
It is implied that pocketcat might be a rapist, I phrased that wrong, but there's not much solid proof. He wants human children and is creepy, but he's also the servant of an unknowable trickster god, so who tf knows what he's actually doing with them. Again, it's different to show something like that actually happening

>>750300214
>>750300219
Yeah, I phrased that poorly. I corrected myself but your comment came out first lol. He IS implied, but not specifically shown

>>750300219
far as I'm concerned if a game wants to show a girl being violently killed, eaten, or mutated, basically suffering in a whole slew of ways, sex is whatever and it fits with the lore
guards were plowing and merging with dogs in this game, so it's not even like sylvian had a modern concept of consent

>>750300440
to add to this, if anything, the mod didn't fit canon when you did get the girl to nod and no marriage was formed, just a tradeoff of adverse/beneficial affects, since the modder didn't think he could do the art justice

>>750300440
Like I said, that does fit with the theme of the game, and would certainly happen. You can imply that happens, you can say it happens, but to actually show it on screen or let the player do it is just fucking tasteless and unnecessary

>>750300575 (me again)
but at that point we didn't know what miro's actual stance on it yet was either. I'd say it was clarified with father hugo, even if it wasn't explicitly used

>>750300626
sure, but so is everything else you can do with her, but that's apparently acceptable to have in the game while a marriage is not, almost certainly due to self-censorship

>>750300626
>is just fucking tasteless and unnecessary
Someone could easily argue that for the entirety of F&H.

>>750300805
why am I spending my Saturday arguing with a pedophile about whether or not raping kids is cool god Im a loser

>>750300937
come on, bro, or gal, that was a proper discussion
censorship isn't a one way street. a whole slew of women latched onto the game for the gay guro rape. is that not also tasteless and unnecessary? many would argue it is

>>750295203
Guess she always had that funger inside her.

>>750301105
many people think Fear and Hunger in its entirety is tasteless and unnecessary, and they aren't wrong. It's not for everyone, and you have the right to say people shouldn't make games like that. I don't think the Terrifier movies have a right to exist and everyone who enjoys them should be ashamed of themselves, but many people don't agree with that.
99.9% of America agrees that raping children is a bad thing, so I think that is the line in the sand. Murder is also bad, obviously, but depicting it in a game and doing it are very different things. Raping a child and watching a child get raped, even when fictional, are only hardly removed. Child porn with fake children is still child porn.

>>750301569
>Raping a child and watching a child get raped, even when fictional, are only hardly removed. Child porn with fake children is still child porn.
I would strongly, strongly disagree with this. there is a world of difference watching some crude sprites bump uglies over doing the real thing, and it is extremely dangerous to conflate the two, especially while simultaneously justifying depictions of murder, torture and rape
the simple solution is it's not real, it's art, and if one doesn't like it, one never has to engage with it. even the mod goes out of its way to make it obscure and difficult to do

>>750301842
The pipeline to killing people in a video game and killing people in real life in nonexistent, as much as the media and pearl-clutching single mothers would have you believe. I don't think there's an argument to imply hurting people in video games will you lead to want to do that in real life.
The same cannot be said for pedophilia. People get addicted to porn and keep chasing more and more thrilling content once the stuff they're used to watching loses its luster. There is a very high chance you will eventually end up watching child porn if you become addicted enough to porn. You might start with fake stuff and tell yourself its okay because it's not real, but there is a real danger of moving onto real stuff once that wears off. You may even say to yourself ,"I'm watching it, yes, but I'm not the one doing it, so it's fine," but that may eventually change too. Every time you watch a child get violated, you are violating them again, even if they haven't even met you. I'm not saying every person who looks at porn will eventually rape kids, that would obviously be a stupid argument, but it's a slippery slope and it comes in stages. You need to find the line, draw it, and never cross it. Even if it's happening in a horror game, and it is not being depicted as something good to do, there are people who will see it and enjoy it. I don't believe people wake up one day and decide to be a pedophile, it happens overtime, and you have a responsibility not to cross the line and give them something that can make them continue down that path.

>>750302604
>The same cannot be said for pedophilia. People get addicted to porn and keep chasing more and more thrilling content
commonly held myth. porn, even the nastiest sort, has been shown to lower sex crimes in long term studies in multiple countries, it's not a slippery slope. even purely fictional porn saves children from being assaulted in real life. people have desires whether they see porn or not, only difference is the porn can be a harmless outlet for them, whereas the lack of porn can turn that outlet dangerous.
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/11/101130111326.htm
people also don't choose their attractions. absolutely nobody would choose to be attracted to kids and have their lives screwed over by the rest of society if they so much as hinted at it, even if it was just to try and make kids safer. still remember some news interview with a self-proclaimed pedo trying to tell people not to dress their little girls like thots, it's dangerous and that a lot of sexual assaults on minors aren't even committed by actual pedos so it's better to be safe, and how the newscasters still looked at and treated him like he was a monster for having the gall to try and warn anyone

>>750303232
The study you site here is just about sex crimes in general, not specially child abuse. I don't think porn should be illegal or anything, you need an outlet for those feelings, because if you bottle them up, the bottle will eventually fill. You can argue fake CP is that outlet, but I think the risk of letting people explore that side of them is too great. Sex is normal, sex with children is not.
>people also don't choose their attractions. absolutely nobody would choose to be attracted to kids and have their lives screwed over
This plays into my point. I said I don't think anyone wakes up and decides to be a pedo. You need to acknowledge that you have those thoughts, and acknowledge that they aren't okay. You need to hold yourself accountable, make sure you never indulge in that side of you, and never cross the line. Continuing down a path that you know is wrong will not help you.

>>750303737
>you need an outlet for those feelings, because if you bottle them up, the bottle will eventually fill
Before you use this line against me, the outlet for pedophilic thoughts is therapy and maybe normal porn, not CP lol

>>750303737
>>The study you site here is just about sex crimes in general, not specially child abuse.
it explicitly mentions lowering sex crimes against children. people also don't lose their morality just because they have thoughts or attractions. I think you would find most men, if not most people, would be getting locked up real quick if we punished people for thought crimes
we're getting sidetracked though. maybe both of us should do something better with our saturday.
>>750303825
I'm not trying to use anything against you, just having a debate as, sadly, this is one of the few places you can relatively safely have such a conversation. avoiding or denying the questions doesn't solve for any answers, but society would rather feel comfortable than informed

why can't we ever have a funger thread about the actual fucking game

>>750304102
we do, this thread is just dead except for me and that other anon

>>750304102
Because nobody on this goddamn board wants to do anything other than ragebait and goon lol. I'm just having a conversation with the only person on this board will to say anything other than "nuh uh, fag"

>>750304040
>it explicitly mentions lowering sex crimes against children
It's mentioned, but it's not a study specifically about CP potentially reducing actual child abuse. Normal porn can be an outlet for those feelings, like I said in my next comment. I don't think porn in general is bad, you just need to be careful about addiction.
>people also don't lose their morality just because they have thoughts or attractions.
I agree. People with thoughts like that aren't evil just for having them, it becomes a problem when they aren't willing to acknowledge they're unacceptable.
>maybe both of us should do something better with our saturday.
I have no friends and my faggot ass car is broken AGAIN

>>750304373
>Normal porn can be an outlet for those feelings
Not really, and stop conflating loli with cheese pizza. Nobody is suffering due to loli, and treating them the same is downplaying the real harm behind real CP, it's insulting the the victims. Nothing in fiction should be verboten outside of direct calls for violence against real people.

>>750304373
>It's mentioned, but it's not a study specifically about CP potentially reducing actual child abuse.
It's not, but it does encompass it. it mentioned lowering sex crimes against children in countries that had made cp legal. which obviously still has a victim, ergo drawings and fantasy are the way to go. addictions are true, but people can get addicted to anything, even just food, so I'd say that's more of a personal failing and the whole shouldn't be punished for the few who can still do something about it
>I have no friends and my faggot ass car is broken AGAIN
in this way we are more alike than different

>>750304373
>they aren't willing to acknowledge they're unacceptable
I'll also add that this is a load of shit, a thought can not be unacceptable, only an action can be. Everybody has dark thoughts, everyone has been so pissed at someone they thought about burying them, but we're more than animals and don't have to give in to those dark primal urges.

>>750304882
I said you're not bad for thinking that way. You need to tell yourself "I shouldn't think that way" is what I mean. You can think "man my coworker is so stupid and lazy, I want to smash his head in" which is normal, but it would not be normal to actually WANT to do that. Its a difficult comparison because thinking about beating up a shitty coworker isnt a big deal, but thinking about fucking a kid is, because its much worse, and you could conceivably end up doing that if you don't challenge that thought. Ties back to what I said earlier about killing people in a video game wont lead to killing people in real life, but I think thinking about children sexually is much more likely to lead to bad things happening.

>>750305109
there's a lot of dissonance between thinking about killing people and actually doing it. Most people understand that it is bad and don't need it explained to them. The same cannot be said about pedophilia. They can make excuses and say it shouldn't be a crime at all, where nobody can really do that with murder.

File: 745b662af8142dcfa9d6db34e(...).jpg (270 KB, 1323x1411)

270 KB JPG

>>750304102
Because faggots ruined the threads. Termina was a mistake.

>>750305183
>where nobody can really do that with murder.
a lot of people do that with murder. hell, society in general often views murder as "less bad" than rape because they can think of excuses for why someone who was murdered deserved to be murdered

>>750305302
society in general knows rape is bad, but I see people all the time saying it's not or it's a bigger deal than it's made out to be. I don't see anyone doing that with murder in any way other than "I'm 14 and I listen to Slipknot"

>>750305109
>You need to tell yourself "I shouldn't think that way" is what I mean.
Why? I've been into loli since I was like 12 years old, and it's never been a problem for anyone.

>but I think thinking about children sexually is much more likely to lead to bad things happening.
I think you should stop pulling things out of your ass because you have nothing to back this up with. We have self control, we are adults, it'd only be dangerous for retards to have these thoughts, not real humans.

It really just seems like your having a kneejerk reaction to something you don't really understand.

>but it would not be normal to actually WANT to do that
I'd kill real chomos if I could legally, and plenty of others. Plenty of people really deserve to die, so I think it's actually probably rarer to find someone that actually wants to hurt kids, than it is to find someone who wants to kill people they can justify as worthy of death.

>>750305414
>Why? I've been into loli since I was like 12 years old, and it's never been a problem for anyone.
jesus christ

>>750305302 (me)
or that the trauma of living is somehow worse than the involuntary permanence of death. the murdered don't have the opportunity to say how horrible being killed was
an easy ultimatum that we'll never see outside of any authoritarian country would be to see how many people would choose to be raped to survive versus being killed. I'm willing to bet most, if not the vast majority. it's like how women say childbirth is the most painful thing in the world, when it's not even close, the ones who say that just have practically no frame of reference

File: re1 chris.png (76 KB, 445x284)

76 KB PNG

>>750305414
this is boiling down to "nuh-uh"s and "your wrongs" at this point, so I dont think theres anything left for me to even say on the subject

>>750305467
I'm 30 now btw, and I was dating at 14 and getting my dick wet.

>>750305467
That's how it is for all men and something women cannot, or are unwilling, to understand. You're attracted to girls your age, and suddenly they're not your age anymore.

>>750305486
I think rape can be worse than murder if you do it repeatedly over a long enough period and include a good amount of torture. Eventually you can make someone beg for death since you've made living so miserable for them.

>>750305624
Exactly, you just don't lose that attraction because it became a nono in the eyes of lying normalfags all of a sudden, it's there forever.

>>750305514
>I dont think theres anything left for me to even say on the subject
There was nothing for you to say from the start since you don't understand it at all.

>>750305624
>12
>loli
yeah, no

File: illust_137394209_20260810(...).jpg (1.35 MB, 2032x1969)

1.35 MB JPG

>>750305467
It's normal for adult men to attracted to fertile, nubile girls of delightfully young ages.

>>750305690
is this even the same guy I was talking to before why are you so hostile all of the sudden lmao

File: 1774726334224.png (10 KB, 426x403)

10 KB PNG

>>750305692
Loli is a body type, retard.

>>750305692
Lolita is 12 in the book nigger, which is where the term comes from. 12 is not only loli, it is the OG definition of it.

>>750305738
I jumped in to call you retarded, this is a public forum so you should get used to it.

>>750305759
>Loli is a body type
are we seriously doing this right now

>>750305692
I'm not talking about 12 specifically or whether or not that qualifies as loli, just that inevitably men are going to get older, and then much older, than the girls they're attracted to for their youth. Women generally don't, they like men older than them for most of their life for the strength, confidence and security.

Oh, so it's a fear and hunger thread
I prefer Lona RPG

>>750305778
I instantly realized you were a new guy, did I not?

>>750305838
No, you didn't because I jumped in before that post.

>>750305778
No, it's actually from the Lolita Complex by Russel Trainer. He named it after Lolita.

File: 4e304ff34c69e41f0439ace17(...).jpg (266 KB, 1611x2048)

266 KB JPG

>>750305794
Yes we are. Loli is a body type. You can have 6000 year old lolis, 0 year old lolis, their age doesn't matter as long as they look like a child between 6-14. If she looks like she should be in kindergarten/elementary/middle school, she's a loli.

>>750305690
>I think rape can be worse than murder if you do it repeatedly over a long enough period and include a good amount of torture. Eventually you can make someone beg for death since you've made living so miserable for them.
True, but I'd argue that's more torture and if it's torture without any light at the end of the tunnel then murder can be a mercy.

>>750305860
Im guessing you jumped in at >>750304882 seeing how thats where the actual conversation stopped and the "nuh-uh fuck you!!!!!!!!!" started

>grown petite women are lolis
bruh

File: 1609935393098.jpg (164 KB, 1200x1456)

164 KB JPG

>>750299486
Its just game bro its not real, you can fuck all the kids you want in a game its not illegal

Having an option to rape lolis is freedom of the player

File: ruin.jpg (31 KB, 833x1200)

31 KB JPG

my thead has become a pedo thread... what have I done...

>>750305894
>He named it after Lolita.
So, what you are saying is it's where the term comes from innit?

>>750305925
Rape can be used as a form of torture, but throwing in other types helps speed up the wishing for death.

>>750305935
Nope, a bit before that. But do go off about how I'm so mean to you queen. That won't make the argument you presented less retarded.

File: 243679ea6266274f321b05ed5(...).png (1.29 MB, 1536x2048)

1.29 MB PNG

>>750305980
Is this a loli, anon?

>>750305802
>men value the young's youth and fertility
>women value the elder's confidence and security
This should work out perfectly if women weren't so damn jealous, schizo and emotionally driven.

>>750302604
>>750303232
you're both right and wrong. porn doesn't lead you to seeking more thrilling content, it leads you to finding out you like things that are adjacent to your initial attraction. and you can, to an extent, choose your attractions as long as you make an intentional effort to draw a line on the content you willingly consume. the base fantasy is inalienable, as far as i can tell. ie, feeder fetish, same size vore, monster vore, giantess vore, etc are based on something eating something else, a completely sexless activity but never the less sexual in the mind of someone fantasizing about it. and it goes further - if you already like vore, what happens to the vored? you can find adjacency in farting, scat, transformation, etc from there. if you were open minded and tried to cross whatever preconceived lines you had defining what you like, you'd probably find that you can enjoy literally anything doing the act. what's actually doing the act is just window dressing - if someone thinks children are a key part of the fantasy, I'd posit that they just haven't tried applying the fantasy to something else.

>>750306023
>So, what you are saying is it's where the term comes from innit?
Like you fucking know the actual context.

The Japanese got it from that book. Not Lolita itself. Dense fuck.

File: Fear-and-Hunger.gif (539 KB, 720x720)

539 KB GIF

>>750295203
Would you?

>>750306023
you seem infinitely more butthurt than I do idk

>>750306023
>innit
i am laughing so hard right now
way to disprove british stereotypes

File: artworks-000033178452-5ea(...).jpg (36 KB, 500x500)

36 KB JPG

>>750305992
>become
>loli in the OP
It was always a loli thread.

>>750305935
he was >>750304693
I'm assuming you're the one I was talking to and I was >>750304694

File: loli_chart.jpg (142 KB, 1200x827)

142 KB JPG

>>750306069
So, what you are saying is, 12 is loli and it's named after Lolita from the book Lolita but nips are retarded and named it after a book named Lolita that is named after Lolita. That's interesting.

>>750306095
>u mad
If you say so nigger

>>750306104
I've borrowed slang from everywhere, you don't know where I'm from bru.

>>750305894
>The Lolita Complex
>like 30 pages in
>kids were getting fucked all the time, trust me bro
This guy's a nonce, isn't he? Even someone with basic knowledge of the middle ages and pre-modern era knows most people married at 18 to prevent death in childbirth and child mortality in general.

>>750305894
>>750306242
>Cleopatra must've been 16
>This makes Antony and Julius "Humpteys"
yeah, we've already lost the plot

File: 1765299016051800.jpg (7 KB, 220x220)

7 KB JPG

>>750306050
I'd argue those fetishes are always kind of there, laying dormant until discovered, but still there. you make the case for vore, I'll make the even harder case for myself with furries. we all watched the lion king when we were little, but in some, usually autistic individuals, nala awoke something in them that followed them throughout their life. they didn't choose to be attracted to a big cat making this face, but it hit them anyway because some part of them was predisposed to it while most of us aren't. in the past, these people would simply never have discovered that part of themselves or would be plowing goats.

>>750301569
Fear and hunger is tasteless and unnecessary, but not because of the lore and horror and porn in it
It's tasteless in mechanics and a type of trial and error game that give you the death penalty for being that obnoxious
A game should be able to be played, and a guide should help you maybe a couple times if you are stuck in some badly designed thing
This shit needs a guide to be played normally (plus a lot of rng to get food and shit) is that stupid of a game
It has nothing to do with horrorporn

>>750305992
>loli in OP
you were the pedo all along and thats based, being lolucon is an essential part of browsing /v/

>>750306085
Yes

>>750306448
>in the past, these people would simply never have discovered that part of themselves
Bro, furries have existed since like forever, the fucking Egyptians and and before that had furries.

>>750306242
>>750306296
He's making a distinction between pedophiles and just being fucked sexually now. Actually kind of interesting. But this sleezy shit is giving me the same feeling I got reading the rape reports for Britain

>>750306561
if that's true I learn something unfortunate every day. I'm assuming that's what I meant by plowing goats and bestiality though unless there was a bizarre subculture around it where they dressed up and acted as animals, which could be, considering the egyptians.

>>750306641
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lion-man_of_Hohlenstein-Stadel

It may not have actually been for sexual purposes, but it is a funny old as shit anthropomorphic animal.

>>750306242
One could always bring up nonexistent aoc laws and how even the US had them set at around 10 and as low as 7 a little over a century ago. What changed? Feminism and women's rights. But make no mistake about men, their age range is broad and modern times have warped the definition of what pedophilia actually is.

If I am named Bob, and I have a son I name Bob after myself, and my son has a son he names Bob after himself, is Bob the Third named after me? He's obviously named after my son, but my son is named after me so he's technically named after me as well right?

>>750306242
That's ignoring the rape, slaves, concubines and prostitutes. No need to risk your arranged wife, which could still be married and shipped off at any age, when they had so many other options.

>>750306242
>>750306296
>>750306634
Alright, this isn't as bad as I thought it'd be. I skipped through some of the interviews and boring passages for what seemed more relevant. I will say the author did go through the effort of pointing out how some lolita complex people were actual pedophiles and some were just people fucked in the head reasonably enough. They had tons of other sexual hang ups to the point labeling them a pedophile wouldn't be accurate.
>>750306987
There wasn't an age of consent. There was a minimum age set for marriage by the church, at least on the peasantry, which was 14, at least in England. You just wouldn't marry your kids that young because they'd either have nothing to offer as boys or die in childbirth as women.
>>750307196
Do you think everywhere was the Ottoman royal family or something?

>>750307253
Rape was and is a large part of human history, marriage was a comparatively insignificant part if you're going by how long we've had it.

>>750307253
>Do you think everywhere was the Ottoman royal family or something?
Laws simply exist for a reason. Friendly reminder the US allowed child marriage in nearly every state until only a few years ago and republicans fought hard to keep it that way. We have not evolved as a species from the last few thousand years, our environment has simply changed and people adapt to not be hammered down, exiled, or killed as women have far more power than they used to and subservient men do their bidding.

>>750307443
You can't ask me to disprove a negative like that.
>>750307471
You're ignoring the context in which those laws were made in the first place: letting a man set his daughter up with one he trusted that could take care of her.

Try approaching history with the mindset of the time instead of viewing everything from a modern lense. It's post-modernist bullshit.

>>750307471
>our environment has simply changed and people adapt to not be hammered down, exiled, or killed
The whole neocolonial era rebukes this statement for all the bloodcurling shit the erstwhile colonial powers keep doing.

File: __izumi_konata_and_hiirag(...).png (778 KB, 1100x1300)

778 KB PNG

>>750305980
Fun fact Konata is canonically 31 now.

>>750307554
>letting a man set his daughter up with one he trusted that could take care of her.
For some good fathers sure. For others, it was dowries, land, creating alliances, etc. I'm not arguing otherwise. I'm simply making points that age and what a man was attracted to didn't become vilified until very recently in human history with the rise of feminism and women's rights.

>>750307554
>You can't ask me to disprove a negative like that.
What? I'm simply stating that marriage is a newborn in human history, before the stone age it was basically not a thing at all. And the AoC is even newer along with the concept of a pedophile. Modern humans are recognized as have having existed for around 300,000 years, and for like 99% of that time men have not cared about the age of the girl they are fucking.

>>750307716
It's not that men were never attracted. It's just that they've always been encouraged and thought it proper to act when women were older. Women can complain about it as much as they want. It was men keeping each other in line long before they were gift wrapped the rights they didn't fight for.
>>750307718
see?

>>750307718
Because pregnancy around delivery term is an extremely vulnerable state and so is the kid afterward, I would argue that even fucking cavemans stick around the women even if they didn't call it "marriage", at least if they want their kid to fucking survive

Enough everyone. I think we must all come to a ceasefire by agreeing that The Girl is cute and should be given plenty of hugs

>>750307794
And, do you think those cavemen could recognize when a girl was 18? Or do you think it was just "If they bleed it's time to breed?" as is common in mammals? Do you think caveman question the ethics of fucking teenagers? Do you think humans might have ended up hardwired to find young girls attractive through nature somehow? And that the modern pushback against that is nothing but an organized denial of nature?

File: sad34asda.png (34 KB, 701x151)

34 KB PNG

>>750307652
In theory she would be way older, since we have a canon year of birth, so it's okay if you want to cum deep inside her busted, old, dusty yet tight little cunny

>>750307786
Men do keep each other in line, they just weren't judging other men over this unless they were particularly cruel about it or overstepped and did it to the wrong girl. Modern men now simply go to great lengths to act on the behalf of women. It's ironic and almost comical how many women don't seem to recognize that while still screeching at men. They would be utterly powerless without such men.

reading this thread pissed me off... but i wont say what pissed me off

File: traitor.jpg (56 KB, 960x954)

56 KB JPG

>>750308018
Give them an inch and they take a mile. But, do remember that without the pussywhipped man, none of this would have happened.

>>750307923
thanks for bringing a lot of shit that I didn't even mention and not adressing my very, very direct point

>>750308235
Your "point" had nothing to do with what I was saying so you can shove it up your ass. You're trying to talk about marriage and I'm telling you it's not a factor in human nature.

>>750307716
there is a point in this that i think has had some ramifications in human sexual selection. humans develop their sexual search image from a very young age into their teenage years, and by not being "groomed" by their peers, ie through social mirroring and finding out something basic like, oh sex with a lover is kind of hot and feels really nice, they end up tuning into childhood fantasies and whatever weird stuff they encounter as a teenager (the time when they really hone in what they like). by being "groomed" from a young age in an arranged marriage or whatever, you both get a chance to lock in what you're attracted to about each other, and it sticks. by starting later, this simply doesn't happen, and everyone is bouncing off of the weird shit they found instead while growing up alone.

on the other hand, this is easily abused and does take away autonomy and freedom of those who have been so imposed on. as with all things, there's a tradeoff, and i gotta admit, i have a soft spot for autonomy and wouldn't want to take it away from others.

>>750308328
A very reasonable stance.

>>750308319
I'll go even farther and say monogamy isn't a given in human nature either, it's a modern trend. Men contributing to rearing children might have happened in our history sure, but all the time? It doesn't even happen nowadays, men impregnate women and want zero responsibility all the time so they leave. If we look at our close relatives like Chimpanzees, Gorillas, and Bonobos we can see that monogamy isn't really a thing with them. If we consider what a human from even 10k years ago might think in their similar but alien way devoid of language, we can likely imagine there would be no room for modern ethics, morals, or concerns about possible risks during delivery (Something they would have very little understanding of even after possibly helping with it) when they are fucking some teenager they just ran into randomly and pinned down as an animal in lust would.

File: HarvestmanFrame.png (225 KB, 1538x969)

225 KB PNG

Got the game to start in fullscreen, but noticed a lot of sprites have stray or missing pixels. I've been cleaning them up. There are over 1000 pictures in this game so it's taking a while. Sorry for the delay.

>>750297634
As canon as you can get, with the exception that marrying the girl doesn't turn you into a Marriage.

>>750300016
It's a little more overt if you have the demon kid with you. Pocketcat will tell him "I want to be your daddy" and I don't think he is talking about throwing the old pigskin around.

>>750310867
Oh hey, is there a way to see the scenes without the annoying black out effect?

>Oh sweet, Funger 1 thread
>look inside
>lolifag thread

File: 1786266293204949.jpg (101 KB, 776x478)

101 KB JPG

>>750311629
gonna cry?

File: funger-god5.png (106 KB, 397x445)

106 KB PNG

My wife

File: stop_penis_erect_archer.gif (902 KB, 500x281)

902 KB GIF

>>750302604
>Every time you watch a child get violated, you are violating them again,
>>750311629
More like twitter tier bickering at least its actual discussion I guess but that faggot musk already has a website for aruging about the morality of loli for all of eternity with sea monkeys and spics why not do that there

What's the moon's problem with her?
And the machine god too I guess?

>>750300016
>Pocketcat doesn't rape anybody, nor is that even implied.
>these are the blithering retards demanding everything be censored

>>750311996
Does the carcass of her previous form remain at the feet ot it's current form forever?

I'm trying to make a 3D Funger

>what if everything was le dark and le hopeless or something and you can't do fuck all cause you're le hecking weak human and a mortal o algo lmao
fuck that, I want games where I can make le evil gods into my bitches like how humans raped nature into submission. Make it hard as fuck, just give me that option.

I jerked off to the loss scene where Francois rapes you. I was really sad that Termina had alot less sex and rape in it.

File: 1747873151938049.webm (2.83 MB, 802x610)

2.83 MB WEBM

>>750313396
D'arce is prime rape bait

>>750313834
I only jerk off to the rape scenes if I'm playing as a guy

>>750312916
No. You see in Termina if you summon TGoFaH, only her final statue form pops out. It's kinda funny actually. Very derpy looking god.

>>750313884
gaaay
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0LF2Gj_IoEo

>>750314641
yes

>>750314641
I'd ask for a gif of it, but finding the actual animation sprites and looping them sounds like more work than it's worth.

>>750300937
NTA but I wouldn't call your censorfag tantrum arguing in the first place.
>>750301842
>99.9% of America agrees that raping children is a bad thing
Would raping children cease being a bad thing if less of America agreed on it? Is being complicit in the real torture, rape and murder of real children okay, if said real children are half a world away? Most of America thinks so, either tacitly or outspokenly.