Was it actually better than Halo?
lol noit controls like ass and was boring as shit compared to Halo
>>750308587No, it had an impeccable aesthetic though. KZ3's online Operations mode is dope as hell though and the fact it's never been replicated really pisses me off.
>>750308587No. 2 and 3 were close though. But the first Killzone was not very good.
I’m gonna be honest I really like Killzone 1 and I think given the hardware it was on I kind of was a good answer to Halo. What made Sony pick GG and this franchise as the answer to Halo though?
>1 false advertising>2False advertising but fulfilled the promise made for 1 and is actually one of the best fps ever made.>3 bit of a let down and not as good as 2, didn't really do anything revolutionary
>>750308587No way they made you kill the good guys
>>750308587Killzone 1 was dogshit but surprisingly enough, Killzone Liberation was a better take on its aesthetic. Killzone 2, however, was one of the greatest games on the PS3, perhaps ever. I mean, people like to glaze FEAR for its NPCs, you should look at Killzone 2’s bloodsplatter effects. The variety of weapons were pretty cool too