[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
▼ Settings Mobile Home
/v/ - Video Games


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: marioifhe.jpg (43 KB, 736x736)
43 KB JPG
Do you think Nintendo will make a modernized Super Mario 64 remake? I mean, seems kind of like an obvious next move, doesn't it?
>>
Nothing about that is obvious because Mario 64 doesn't tell a story, it's a (by today's standards) incredibly basic set of obstacle courses with no cohesion or any sense that these are real spaces. There are modern Mario games that take this approach, namely 3D World, but I don't see why they wouldn't just make a new game in that style than go back.
There's a much, much more compelling argument to be made for Sunshine because it's got a skeleton that's begging for more meat on its bones and a famously rushed development that crippled the game in a lot of ways that could be easily addressed in a remake.
But I'm sure others have their own strong opinions on this.
>>
File: retard gorilla nigger.jpg (265 KB, 912x1136)
265 KB JPG
>>751293179
>Nothing about that is obvious because Mario 64 doesn't tell a story, it's a (by today's standards) incredibly basic set of obstacle courses with no cohesion or any sense that these are real spaces. There are modern Mario games that take this approach, namely 3D World, but I don't see why they wouldn't just make a new game in that style than go back.
>There's a much, much more compelling argument to be made for Sunshine because it's got a skeleton that's begging for more meat on its bones and a famously rushed development that crippled the game in a lot of ways that could be easily addressed in a remake.
>But I'm sure others have their own strong opinions on this.
>>
Can I get something new and interesting and good that expands my perception of what a video game can do?
>>
>>751293334
Should have realized when controllers stopped evolving in 2000 that the medium has largely been solved.
All that's left is to combine existing designs in clever ways until the heat death of the universe.
>>
They won't unless they feel they need to train devs on Super Mario 64 for some reason because that was the logic given for why Ocarina of Time was chosen for a remake. OoT also has a better justification for it on account of Zelda not having had a "traditional" entry for twenty years prior to that, while Mario Odyssey was a scant 7 years between itself and Super Mario Galaxy 2
>>
>>751292857
Mario if he double vaxxed, boosted, thanked his healthcare heroes, trusted the science, and stayed socially distanced
>>
>>751292857
Vros i got 1 dose because they were about to mandate it, then they didnt so i didnt get the 2nd dose. Is it ogre?
>>
I don't get the significance of this picture
>>
>>751293179
Yeah even Nintendo fans would have trouble söyfacing over Hazy Maze Cave having realistic wall textures, but most people would love to see Sunshine with the power of the Switch 2
>>
>>751292857
>Focus, M. Only you can free the kingdom from Bowser's tyranny
>Your wish is my command, princess
Imagine
>>
>>751292857
is he okay
>>
>>751293676
>if you're against the pharmaceutical industry then you're a republican
>>
>>751292857
I look like this
>>751293929
and I say this
>>
>>751294182
Remember to take your twice yearly Spikevax™ to help stop the spread
>>
>>751293179
This Anon is 100% right.
Remaking "Mario 64" would be like someone remaking "Doom 2", with those same shitty levels by Sandy Petersen, but with more realistic geometry and textures or something like that. It makes 0% sense within video game culture.
It's impossible to remake these games without drastically changing how they work
>>
>>751294345
No need, I already injected bleech and took horse dewormers.
>>
>>751292857
Remaking super Mario sunshine would make more sense than remaking Mario 64
>>
Two of my online friends got heart issues after taking their two doses, meanwhile I'm going strong without them, and only had a minor sickness when I did get covid.
Really says a lot.
>>
>>751294470
>I already injected bleech and took horse dewormers
Those don't inoculate you against the virus
>>
File: Real perfect mario.jpg (212 KB, 1536x3132)
212 KB JPG
>mario if he safe+effective and never EVER look up changes in excess mortality in ANY demographic
>>
>>751294524
>Remaking super Mario sunshine would make more sense
This, all the water/goop physics, and the fact that Isle Delphino would be amazing as one big model. Plus the controls aren't as revered as Mario 64 so Nintendo has wiggle room to not get the movement exactly 1x1 with the original.
>>
>>751294525
Nicki tanked
>>
Nintendo said in their recent financial meeting that they want to have a steady release of remakes
>>
>>751293274
But enough about your mother's boyfriend.
>>
>>751293179
Good post but the problem is corporations don’t decide to produce a remake based on creative principles, they make it to exploit the nostalgia associated with the old game. As stupid and unnecessary it may be, I expect a Mario 64 remake with voice acting and fleshed out lore for each reimagined painting zone before Nintendo tries to fix Sunshine.
>>
Super Mario 64 is a giant utilitarian wasteland. Anything that doesn’t serve a gameplay function doesn’t exist, and anything that does is there with no regard for appearances. There are very few areas in the game that even try to feel like a real place that exists for any reason besides having Mario jump around.

This is fine because the game was a giant experiment, but if you attempt to modernize it it’ll just look wrong. Throwback Galaxy in SMG2 was awkward, I can’t imagine the whole game with even better graphics.
>>
>>751292857
>Do you think Nintendo will make a modernized Super Mario 64 remake
Not themselves but outsource it to a bunch of studios. Hell, maybe even that man will take a crack at it.
>>
>>751292857
Mario doesn't benefit from detailed realistic graphics like Zelda does.
>>
>>751292857
Probably not. OoT made sense since the last few Zelda games have been very different than the classics, and it's less risky than going back and making an oldschool Zelda from scratch that everyone might hate.
But Mario 64 has more or less the same gameplay as Odyssey, Galaxy, Bowser's Fury etc. A fresh coat of paint isn't going to make it new and exciting, even if it's oozing NINTENDO HIRE THIS MAN.
>>
>>751292857
Mario if he safe and effective
>>
>>751292857
Every 3D Mario since Super Mario 64 has been a 64 remake with a shallow gimmick tossed in
>>
File: h7u2l4p1z6qd1.jpg (290 KB, 1080x1578)
290 KB JPG
>>751293869
>>751293179
If nintendo had balls, they would make a game with the concept artwork style un uncompressed 3D models. They used to have the hardware to only make still frames like this with hours of computational time, but now they could do it in realtime.
>>
File: Mario.jpg (36 KB, 543x368)
36 KB JPG
>>
>>751300875
Mario if he unreal
>>
>>751292857
>A Mario game with modern Nintendo movement that feels stiff and unfun
>Probably will overwrite speed and inertia constantly
>Probably will have a run button
>Probably will have a crouch charge jump
>Might not even have a triple jump
>Might not even have unfiltered analog movement
Mario 64 was good because it nailed movement, but otherwise it's just like any other very janky early 3D platformer and was using an asset library as a crutch, a modern remake would just turn it into Bubsy 3D or any other garbage 90s platformer.
>>751300475
Every 3D Mario since 64 has included fewer 64 elements than the last game.
>>
>>751293869
>the power of the Switch 2
So a 2013 pc?
>>
>>751292857
>he took the shot
Most raped kikeslave



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.