I just traded my Z-44 for Atago. Did I do well?
>>2567585You now own a mediocre ship at tier 8, congrats.For the 5 people who still play this game, if you download, install and log into WoT: HEAT you get some decent rewards on WoWS. You dont even need to play a game and you can uninstall after.
>>2577061Forgot pic, fuck.
I'm half tempted to trade a coal ship for a "free" Mainz, just not sure if it's worth the 180k~ coal at coupon discount price to collect another T8 premium that I may or may not play
How is the F2P experience nowadays on WoWs? I'm sick and tired of WoT and their antics so im skeptical to jump in another Wargaming game. I've tried it before and felt like the +-2 MM is even worse in WoWs, or you just get blasted by premiums since the only people left playing are veterans
>>2606157It varies a lotMM is bad in fucking general with a ton of stupid bullshit, and there are plenty of very egregious P2W ships and Admiral Packs/Wishing Wharfs, but the WoWS team has been generous enough giving out free premiums and other incentives to actually play and with Asym being extended because the entire community demanded it (I filled in the survey and literally said "If you remove Asyms I will stop playing the game entirely") you can sorta just ignore the broken PvP queues and farm bots for okay rewards They nerfed it a chunk so it's not nearly as good for grinding out ships/credits but it's still better than co-op and makes dockyards bearable
I know this thread is kinda dead but it's so weird that decals are limited to T9 shipsT10 is the actual penultimate tier everyone is grinding towards/playing so I figured it'd start out as a T10 thing and move down the tiers until ships from T6 to T10 (+Superships) could use decalsI guess I have a good amount of T9 premiums that I can play and apply decals to (or just save them until they add other ships) but like how many people are saving T9 tech tree ships to play that that's the tier they chose for decals?
high effort translation
>>2608028How would you translate it, sperg?"Commander... Big Big Big Love..."
O SAY CAN YOU SEE
fugg
>>2607141A lot of ships x N attachment points. Same with Tanks. It'll take a while to get them fir the rest of the tiers.
>>2685790That'll be 75,000 dubs worth of sequential bundles, goyOr a 0.1% Wishing WharfOr nestled containers
>>2567585No you got ripped of dumbass
So apparrently low-tier cruisers are getting heals. Should I start playing again?
>>2750320They already did
>>2751182>only t6 and aboveMonster furutaka dream is over
>>2754077It'd be kinda stupid on the really low tier cruisers and nobody really plays anything below T6 these days anywaysI'm kinda split about the new support CV tools, I think the firefighting one is kinda neat if a bit obnoxious for ships that rely on firestarting (you bait out his DCP, get a juicy triple fire, and then the CV cucks you by dropping water on him) but I'm not really sure how I feel about the CV being able to drop a free heal on someone you're fighting We'll see how they balance them but the article says "they may rarely be shot down" but I think they should give the planes an absurdly low HP of like 200 and if you try to support a teammate who is brawling within AA range of an enemy ship your heal/damagecon just gets instantly shot down to preserve some tiny amount of fairnessI also kinda hope the firefighting one has to be called in like a dutch airstrike so it has a long lag time and doesn't negate all of your fire damage, just enough to be useful and maybe save the guy from burning down so he can cycle his heal
>new, "updated" wiki>it looks worse than the old one and has no infogod bless
>New Jersey devblogthis game is deeply unserious lmaohttps://blog.worldofwarships.com/blog/closed-test-158-new-shipsThat and the new 50k dub Fuyutsuki is making me fucking laugh like they stopped caring a long time ago but maaaaanhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dD06lO-hfUk
>>2802578But I like my Hayate...
>>2814770Sorry bro cough up for the new mega Akizuki if you want an IJN gunboat
Man, I know these threads have always been dead but I'm surprised that there's basically nobody left.I figured we'd at least get some discussion around the Holiday Convoy, Kitakami is pretty stupid and New Jersey is going to take a lot of work to earn but for minimal effort you can pick up a T10 reward ship or two decent T9 premiums if you're a newer player and need premiums.For a bit of coal investment you could be grabbing two T10 reward ships and if you're willing to grind hard for half a year for a mere 12k RB/6k steel you can get the 420k tokens to get all three new T10 reward ships. I'm probably going to grind + coal New Jersey for 400k but getting 3x T10 reward ships is pretty sweet even if it's a bit more grind than GQ Johnny was and wipes out a big chunk of your coal stockpile (as if coal matters that much)
>>2820464They shat on the game too much. I came back and played last year for all the free shit but I couldn't be fucked staying when they can't fix randoms or make good events. They aren't giving out shit this year in comparison either.
AA is weaker than everGG Wargaming
>>2824692This is getting on my nerves. Why do they keep buffing CVs even though they know that most of the player base hate them?
>>2824712idk if it's even meant to be a CV buff they just "reworked" AA and now it's less satisfying to use and kinda sucks
I'm really curious to see what PQ has to say about the 20 de JulioOn one hand it has no fucking tools (smoke, hydro, etc)But on the other it has a pretty strong heal and it does like 444k AP DPM with improved pen angles thanks to the on-demand MBRB (has basically no minimum activation time or cooldown) and the auto-activated funny button that further buffs the AP alpha damage so it'll do something retarded like 500k AP DPM and literally melt you within 5 seconds if it catches you not pure bow/stern in (and it has decent enough conceal to do that)
>>2824771they are also slashing CV cooldownshttps://blog.worldofwarships.com/blog/closed-test-157-balance-changes>marble B dockyardkek another slop
>>2824692Nobody ran DFAA anyway. If you took DFAA over hydro you're a retard.
>>2827730I don't even know if I want Marlborough as a port queen, I guess it's probably worth it for collection's sake + flakes but I doubt I'll ever play the fucking thingIt is a shame they picked basically the worst dockyard ship imaginable but at least that'll hopefully mean the grind is basically non-existent since Lushun was piss easy last year
Another copy paste ship. They never recover from Wargamming-Lesta split.
>>2840200>copy pasteIt's this cringe ass reskin shit they've been doing lately where you get to pay a couple hundred into a shitty gambling wishing wharf to get a "historical" skin of the ship when it was sunk, because apparently people pay top dollar for ugly ass reskins full of holes and battle damageYou also get a special commander and collection for the trouble or some shit.I don't know, I don't get the appeal.
>guy barking at me to cap instead of actually playing the game and being useful>he does absolutely nothing all match>check his profile after>39% WR over 10,000 battles>34% in his most played ship, the fucking Colombo>in 2 man divs, which is about 20% of his matches, he has a 33% WR>avg dmg and exp are also patheticWhy do the absolute worst players who have literally no idea how to play the game always seem to be the most vocal armchair commanders in the match?
>>2841895because dunning-kreuger is eternal.