I don't use this website and don't know if this is the right place to discuss this, but here it is: A major concern about blue archive I have and wanted to debate about is the majorly erotic portrayal of characters the game itself officially admits to be underaged. You can freely go on the wiki and see mind blowing examples of this, and as I've never got to discuss this, I don't know what the main counterargument is that the game's community uses to disprove this. It simply appears blatant to me. So how is this not insane?Here is an image of the kind of things the game will have. This is both NOT the most concerning case, nor the only one. Can we debate this?
I think they in fact should make more lewd versions of the students like any true sensei
>>2066872Makes sense, if I draw a character and say they are 16 years old and I draw them wearing a skimpy outfit that sexualizes them, it shows that I'm okay with sexualizing an imaginary 16 year old. Its definitely immoral since people who are not adults should not be sexualized. The character is not actually a 16-year-old since the character isn't real, but in the mind of the person who drew the character or imagines it the same way as the person who drew it, something immoral is happening because they want to imagine sexualizing the character that is under the age of 18.The debate is pretty clear cut. If you imagine sexualizing a fictional underaged character you're having an evil thought, just in the same way that if you imagine torturing a fictional character you're having an evil thought. The actual evil, immorality and insanity is taking place in the mind of the person. Murderers definitely imagine killing people before they actually kill them, same as rapists imagine raping before they actually rape, so even if it's only imaginary, it's still evil. Anyway, this doesn't mean that people who play Blue Archive are imagining sexualizing underage characters just because in the actual real life game they aren't 18. The fictional character in someone else's mind is not the same fictional character in someone else's mind.
>>2070658Welcome to anime, enjoy your stay.
I guess if you want a definitive answer you can go ask the characters themselves how they feel about it.
>>2072115yeah nigga, it is just a drawing of a half naked girl and not an actual half naked girl. go call your turd world police about it, retard.
>>2066872>I don't use this websiteI can tell
Go be a cuck to twitter or reddit.
>>2070658What makes sexualizing a 16 year old not okay as opposed to an 21 year old?
Hello Chinkoid but 4chan has a long history of loli tolerance. Our founder mootykins was a huge lolicon himself
>>2066872Go back to bluesky or reddit to bitch about mushoku tensei or something with the rest of the cattle.
>>2066879/thread
thanks for the laugh OP
>>2070658>>2066872>underagedSocial construct, see pic related>Its definitely immoral since people who are not adults should not be sexualized.When you hit puberty, you're a young adult.Young, but still an adult.When you finish puberty you're just an adult.Also morality is relative.Ex: A woman exposing her hair in public is immoral and should be punished via stoning, but something tells me you don't agree with this version of morality.>So how is this not insane?Because it isn't. Though, you've been brainwashed into believing it is. Since you don't know real history and are deliberately not taught about such things in school.>Can we debate this?There is no debate.If you disagree with it based on Christian values (which your pic implies), then you have not read the Bible in it's entirety.Numbers 31:17-18"Now therefore, kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman who has known a man by sleeping with him. But all the young girls who have not known a man by sleeping with him, keep alive for yourselves."The distinction here is the use of the words "woman" and "young girl". And since it is God commanding them to take the young girls for themselves (sexually), He does not deem it a sin or immoral to have sex with "young girls", therefore sexualizing "young girls" is also permissible. Therefore not a sin or immoral.So yeah, the debate is pretty clear cut. God is fine with sexy 13-year olds and the men who knock them up and marry them are good Christians.>Murderers definitely imagine killing people before they actually kill them, same as rapists Surprisingly, no. A majority of murders are impulsive, spur of the moment. That's why premeditated murder carries a heavier sentence. Otherwise, it's manslaughter if it's entirely by accident.As for rape, there's a category called "statutory rape" which is basically the government deciding it was rape no matter what the two people having sex think about it, which is pretty fucked up.
Neru Matrimony
>>2066872People who hand wring about violence in games "sexualization" and "pedophilia" and other horseshit in fiction by definition aren't serious people because they're performative fucks. Go battle real life pedophile gangs and expect to end up in body bags or in prison for racism. Crying about pixels is unemployment core. You're not a saint, you're just annoying and deserve a smack across the face.
>>2066872Yeah, i'm concerned there isn't enough paizuri content made with 1X years old.
>>2066872maybe you should be concerned about actual real pedophiles that touch children instead of pixels in a videogamelike the current US president :)Do you also consider every game that features a guy shooting a gun at people to encourage violence?
I don't think it's right to try to force art to always be ethic and moral. Taboo eroticism has always been a thing, and so long as it isn't actively harming real individuals I view its existence as bellow concern.
>>2070658>The character is not actually a 16-year-old since the character isn't real, but in the mind of the person who drew the character or imagines it the same way as the person who drew it, something immoral is happening because they want to imagine sexualizing the character that is under the age of 18.So it's ok if you put a disclaimer like American vn localizers do?
>>2066872Blue Archive is THE pedo game. Every character is a loli and are referred to as your "students". Whining about pedoshit in a pedo game feels like a waste of time.
>>2066872I'm concerned OP is a faggot.
