no lmaowhat the fuck, are you guys serious when you say this? do you REALLY think gamefreak can get this right
>>59301614Pokemon has one of the largest shipping communities of any fandom on the internet
>>59301624and they'd get upset when they can't date the one they want because of "insert arbitrary reason they're not included" or because they decided to try having a canon one and no one else is datable. Imagine a SV where you were forced to date Penny
Boy/girl relations are an integral part of growing up. Ignoring sex entirely can lead to weird repressed shit but I think they handle it just fine for what the games are.
>>59301609No one cared in BW2
I don't know if this is comparable. Isn't the protagonist of medabots an actual character rather than a self insert for the player?
>>59301609Yes. SV should've had them for one. It honestly feels like they wanted to implement them but weren't allowed to. That's why they put in the League Club in the DLC.>>59301638Ideally, SV would let you choose between the 3 rivals (+2 from the DLC if you have it). But yeah, it shouldn't be forced either way, it should be 100% optional like a post-game thing.>>59301653This shit was so arbitrarily obscure AND tedious, of course no one wanted to bother. It was a huge hassle. And you didn't even know the characters prior to this side quest, so it was hard to commit to do so much bullshit to pseudo-date a character you don't know you like. It should've happened with a character you already got to know during the main story, maybe then people would've felt invested enough to go through the effort.
Gamefreak can barely write regular stories, the romance would be trash. If you don't get the option to say yes or no can you think of how bad that would be? You give one to many berries to the girl and you're now locked out of a nurse joy family orgy. Also i just noticed Ikki from medabots has misty's hair.
>>59301708>Also i just noticed Ikki from medabots has misty's hair.delet
>>59301737
>>59301609They'll never ever do it, the closet we'll ever get is that diet romance in BW2
>>59301609Tell the class how many crossdressing options Ikki has in this game.Don't be shy.
>>59301950Is this the ps1 or the gba? I know the gba had a couple
>>59301973it's the GBA
>>59301690>It honestly feels like they wanted to implement them but weren't allowed to.Oh, for sure. The first DLC feels so much like a summer romance story with the actual romance filled off.
>>59301919lost
>>59302020Yeah exactly. Even in the basegame there's some pretty "personal" moments with the rivals, but the DLC seems almost blatantly romance bait.
>>59301950Little girl, magical princess, and pink yukata. I remember those in the game.
>>59301609Whats the point if you cant romance your pokemons?
>>59301690If they did do it, there would be no homo options, that’s for sure. So don’t get your hopes up. They’re still kid games.
>>59301609You already can make your Pokemon fuck.
>>59301624As big as Pokemon is, I doubt that
>>59301653I could never find all the exact spots in what order I had to stand in.
>>59301609We're certainly getting close to that point, what with the ever increasing focus on humons. It's not like they haven't already been dabbling in it either.
>>59301609Photographer girl was best girl btw
>>59301624It's the largest media franchise on the planet and they can't deliver a game that clears 8 dollar shovelware slop standards, what in the fuck makes you think they could get romance mechanics right?
>>59301609didn't they go as far as remove a girlfriend / boyfriend tease ?
>>59302579Well yeah, either that, or it would need to be ambiguous enough to thinly disguise it as "friendship", like the Lodge in Masters Ex.
>>59303333In ORAS yes, there's a bit with (You) and the opposite sex protag confronting Team Magma or something where it was changed from them mockingly calling Brendan/May lovebirds to something else
>>59301609Yes, even if it's unlikely to ever happen. Better yet, I want a pokopia game but with human characters. Imagine making a house for your favourite trainers and hanging out with them, would be peak.
>>59301653>>59301609you now remember picrel
>>59303412I'll pretend I don't remember.
>>59303412I don't remember because this was censored in the English version.
>>59301609Yes I should be able to abduct and having a lovingly codependent relationship with Grimsley in game
>>59303412Why did gamefeak decide to add this?? Like the only two reasons I can think are that they thought it was funny or that a random dev genuinely had a fetish for this and added it without telling anyone.
>>59303430Based
>>59302882This guy gets it
>>59301609>Change localization name to "Erika">Still pronounce it "Arika"
pokegirls<<<medagirls
>>59303534>Can't romance Samantha Missed opportunity
>>59301609Yes. I enjoy a cute innocent romance between a boy and a girl.>>59301653I care. It just that this one is almost impossible to find on your own without a guide. Most people beaten the game without even knowing this was in the game.
>>59303550I love Green and want to adventure together with her in game
>>59303560It would be SOOOOO Cute to be able to go on a pokemon journey with green
>>59302535There were two little girl options and also a waitress outfit. (I have always believed the waitress outfit was a bunny girl outfit in the japanese GB version but have never looked into it.)
>>59303432BW is full of innuendo that got censored, that’s just the most noteworthy example, parts of the story were censored too
>>59303601Oh, yeah. The waitress outfit.I usually forget it because that one is post-game, next to the ninja village.
>>59301690>>59302020kys chapjeet, subhuman retard spammer
>>59301624It's no longer than my cock
>>59303412>tfw you will never have sweaty bear hiker sex in a ferris wheel
>>59301609I honestly thought he was a girl.
>>59303534Based
I think it worked in medabots because Ikki is NOT "you" he's Ikki and you're playing as him so there's actual romantic interactions with the girls while in Pokemon all you would get is characters fawning over your emotionless self insert
>>59301653honestly what this needed was dialogue options instead of just>hey, what kind of pokemon do you like, player?>... oh, really? i like that kind tooeven if every dialogue option is "correct" and it just changes the flavor text curtis/yancy tell you it would at least feel somewhat more personal
>>59301690>>59302020>t. brown chapjeet
>>59301653I did
only with pokemon