What makes Pokemon so superior to other monster franchises? Is it because the other franchises are shit for subhumans?
>>59304556>it because the other franchises are shit for subhumans?That's pretty much what Pokemon is now
>>59304556because most pokemon fans are pokemon fans, not 'monster franchise' fanssuch is the nature of autism
>>59304556You're not even white
>>59304802Digimon is for trannys, faggots, and jeets like you.
Nostalgia. By quality alone Digimon is better but the mainstream isn't ready for this conversation.
>>59304556Powerful nostalgia + abnormal levels of fan loyalty + piggybacking off of Nintendo's brand strength.
>>59304556Like most media franchises that got popular, it was in the right place at the right time.
>>59305654so is Pokemon
>>59304556the deceptively simple, but incredibly complex and nuanced strategic battle systemthat's where every pokeclone goes wrong: they think that the problem with pokemon is its "slow," "outdated" turn-based combat so they make it into a tps button masher or something
Pokemon is saturated and consistent. Having persistent transfers over 20+ years probably helps, too. It's not just a game, it's a platform to be invested in.