>>59345975Natural. Many plants and even animals are toxic as to deter others eating them Mons like koffin/garbodor are obviously chemical toxins though but for the most part it's a natural thing you see in nature
>>59345975Both.
>>59345975Retard
>>59345975You tell me.
>>59345975Natural.
>>59345975Unnatural.
>>59345975Delete this thread.Stop digging into this. You have been warned.
>>59347389Why are you posting steam?
>>59347525
>>59347292Why are you posting an animal?
>>59347831It's extremely poisonous. There are many poisonous and venomous animals, and they've existed for millions of years.
>>59347675It's extremely poisonous. There are many poisonous and harmful factories, and they've existed for hundreds of years.
>>59347852But the factories you posted aren't harmful, they're expelling steam which is harmless>hundreds of yearsHmmm that is a bit less than millions huh?
>>59347849But the frogs aren't that harmful, they're just living on trees which is harmless.>millions of yearsHmmm all that time and poisonous animals have had that little impact on the environment huh?
>>59347877The frogs evolved into being poisonous as a defense mechanism, but there's also venomous animals who use their vemon to kill. The frogs is just an example>impact on the environmentAnd why would that matter for the OP question? The question isn't which aspect of Poison is more influential for the environment so wtf are you babbling about? Why are you so offended by what I'm saying kek
>>59347891>b-buh venom!This thread is about Poison type, not Venom type.
>>59347899Venom is a category of poison, it's a toxic substanceAlso industrial pollution is not "poison" either so idk wtf you are sperging about when it doesn't even defend your own point at all?
>>59347949>Venom is a category of poisonNo it isn’t.
>>59347954>Nuh-uh!Okay so you're just trollingPoison, venom and toxin are all interchangeable terms unless you're writing a scientific paper about a very specific form of toxic substanceAnd by your own retard logic, pollutants aren't poison either lmaoSo if you think only actual "poison" is "Poison type" then the only kind of Pokémon that is actually Poison type would be things like the Bulbasaur line or the Foongus line. Pokémon like Ekans can't be Poison type since those are venomous species who inject their toxins right?
>>59348002>Poison, venom and toxin are all interchangeable termsNo they aren’t.
>>59348021They are if you don't have autism
>>59348029They aren’t if you’re not ESL.
>>59348043You are a retard.
>"In science, a poison is any chemical substance that is harmful or lethal to a living organism. The term of poison is used in a wide range of scientific fields and industries, where it is often specifically defined">Anon: Nuh uh
Which Poison types are actually poisonous and which are venomous? Are there any who are both?
>>59348057You are a retard ESL.
>>59348066Whatever you say Kojo.
>” Venom and poison are not the same. While both are toxic substances produced by living organisms, their primary difference lies in how they are delivered”>Anon: Nuh uh
>>59348043Only an esl wouldn't know how those words are used in casual conversation. You will never be white.
>>59348057Only a retard wouldn't know how those words are used in casual conversation. You will never be white.
>>59348075Okay, now do pollutants and tell us why they are the exactly same as poison, to the point where they define the entire type :)Also you know what they say about parroting, right?
>>59348063All Grass/Poison dual types are poisonous, which isn't that many. I guess you could also include fuckin Pecharunt cause it's a peach. You could also include the Croagunk line as they are based on poisonous frogs whose poison is meant to be ingested to be effective, and the same goes for the Toxel line.Venomous is everything that spreads toxins by damaging skin, be it biting or something like spikes (Poison Point etc). This includes the majority of Poison types (I think) such as all the Nidos, Zubat line, Ekans line, Weedle line, Tentacool line... you get the idea. Special mention goes to Paldean Wooper line because it would seem like they belong to the Poisonous category but the animal they're based on is the Iberian ribbed newt which turns its own ribs into spikes covered in toxins so it's apparently defines as both venomous AND poisonousAnd the third categorie would be the pollutants, so all the garbage based Pokémon like the Grimer line or Trubbish line, all gas based Pokémon like Koffing line or... I guess Skuntank line?? Not pollution related so I don't even know if that counts, so maybe gas needs to be separate? I wouldn't count Grimer as gas typeAnd I don't know where the hell I should put the Gulpin line, they don't fit in any of these categories.
>>59345975is this the stupid nigger who thinks fairies are weak to steel and poison because of industrialization and not because of folklore
>>59348114>copycat stageReally making yourself look less brown with this
>>59348143Most if not all poisonous Pokemon would also quality as venomous since they can use attacks to inject or drench the opponent in venom.
>>59348150>logicfagging the type chartkek
>>59348163I mean yeah by that logic every single Pokémon that can learn Toxic (including non-Poison types) is venomous. I was trying to think of things the Pokémon are based on rather than what they actually do as Pokémon because yeah duh they all use attacks that puts toxins into the enemy's system somehow
>>59348194But they did fix Toxic's distribution in Gen 9, now the only things that learn it are honorary Poison types like Umbreon (who is canonically poisonous)
>>59348206That's true yeahUmbreon sweats poison but can apparently deliberately spray it on enemies so you could say it's venomous. Gligar line is also honorary Poison type. Anyone else?
>>59348271Regular Wooper, Reuniclus
>>59348343I never noticed how much Cynthia looks like that vorefag shauns mom
>>59345975How do you not know?
>>59348115>tell us why poison is poison
