Contrary to popular belief, some Pokémon do in fact have objectively bad designs, and it's not just a difference of "perspective"
>>59402714True. Samurott is one such case. I don’t know why you posted a picture of Baxcalibur though.
>>59402732You mean poomonster shitperior?
>>59402714true, Rhydon being the ur-example
Everyone above me is a retarded faggot with shit taste.
>>59402732>samurott out of no where>also the first postThis is advanced mental illness.
>>59402864this is a very funny post
>>59402714Best pseudo since Garchomp (good effort, H!Goodra)
Yeah like Jynx and Chnasey and Mr Mime and Trubbish
>>59402714Contrary to popular belief, no one actually cares about the shit taste of a 4chan loser faggot
>>59403004This board is just /v/ bit exclusively for Pokemon in that it kept everything that made /v/ shit.
The only objective measure of a bad design is one that noone likes or cares about.Kind of like the bottom here.
>>59403100notice how it's almost always shitty middle evos or early route fodder
>>59403100>Specifically just may 2026What a good measure
>>59403129Fair. There was a bigger one before.
>>59403139>oni>plant>set of gearswtf why is this not exclusively cartoon animals Kojo is going to 41%>not a single fossil pokemon in the bottom 30Oh, he's acking.
>>59403139still holds true >>59403113 but with the addition of filler fishmon and minun for some reason
>>59403100How is argumentum ad populum objective?>>59402714I could agree, but you need to define what an objectively good or bad design is. Explain why. Otherwise fuck off with the term and the thread.
>>59402714Pic unrelated.
>>59402714was gen 9 when they started pulling up the game model in blender and drawing over it? even Legends Arceus mons had dynamic action poses for their official art
>>59403155Since it's just based on how many people are visiting the pages, harder-to-obtain mons have an unfair advantage. People are probably gonna end up looking up how the hell you get a Bastiodon in Legends Arceus whether they like the thing or not, for completion's sake.
>>59403100>so forgettable they have to be looked upkek
>>59402714That's pretty much the entire gen 9 dex.
>>59402864It’s not “out of nowhere” when the thread is about objectively bad Pokemon designs, retard-kun.
isnt it odd how this board in particular loves using "objectively" in subjective cases
>>59403444You lost btw
>>59403451>objectively bad Pokemon designsOnly in /vp/, yes
>>59403455It's cause of autism. Autists don't understand the concept of opinion.
>>59403455Arrogance and simple-mindedness leads you to believe your opinion is the only right one
>>59403139Loudred is a great design, fuck these niggers
>>59403584And everywhere else, yes.
>>59403155>wtf why is this not exclusively cartoon animalsMost of these are cartoon animals tho?
>>59403455It's relatively recent too. I think a lot of posters here get all their opinions from youtube or something.
>>59403139minunbros... at least we have the porn...
Did Hassel kick OP's ass or something?
