>only one game mode after 6 months of release>implementing NFE mons into the game is too hard>constantly bringing out shitmons to bloat the cast, but they never try to buff them>no single-player content because people wouldn't pay for the battle pass>still runs like ass and zero optimizationThis is like the Monkey's Paw Bart meme.
>still runs like ass and zero optimizationit's perfectly fine, retard.
>>59586039Zardslop meta
>>59586039>This is like the Monkey's Paw Bart memeAlmost everything in the franchise is like that.
>>59586039>only one game mode after 6 months of releasethere's multiple game modes>implementing NFE mons into the game is too hardthere's multiple NFE pokemon>constantly bringing out shitmons to bloat the cast, but they never try to buff thembut they do buff them>no single-player contentwhy would a competitive focused game have single player content?
>>59586039>>no single-player content because people wouldn't pay for the battle passYou almost could have been taken seriously but then you had to out yourself as an assblasted campaignshitter
>>59586052>Zardslop metahe lost
>>59586039>no single-player content because people wouldn't pay for the battle passThe game is designed for battling retard. If you want to play single player stuff, you have 30 years of Pokémon games to choose from.
>>59586039I disagree with the notion for singleplayer, but I have to ask, can they really only do one outfit per battle pass? Especially when their other additions are extremely lacking
>>59586039do you really need NFE mons for comp unless it's for LC or some meme troll strat?
>>59586220eviolite
>>59586220There are a few that are legit better than their evolutions, like Porygon2. But the devs literally said they'd be added later, OP is being deliberately retarded
>>59586220Some are really cool/good additions. Clefairy, Murkrow, Porygon2, someone used Polywag at a double restricted tournament recently.
>>59586057>but they do buff themHow so?
>>59586203Stadium and Battle Revolution had single-player content and they're also designed for battling only>>59586057>there's multiple game modes>there's multiple NFE pokemonName them then. What other game modes besides 3v3 singles and 4v4 doubles are there?
>>59586418Funny that, it's almost as if Champions has a completely different target market and remit to games released as part of Pokémania and as part of Wii promotion. Which is why they didn't see the need to add single player content to an app stated to be for competitive battling.
>>59586039its the most anyone has ever talked about competitive pokemon, and it has an absolutely enormous player count compared to something like ranked in SWSH and SV. also interest is renewed every 2.5 months when a new selection of pokemon (both meta relevant and surprise shitmons) is added to the game.the only thing they REALLY need to add is a 6v6 option for private battles
>>59586347there will come a point when most existing fully evolved pokemon have been added, its then theyll start mixing in NFEs with the batches of newly added pokemon
>>59586673>it has an absolutely enormous player count compared to something like ranked in SWSH and SVonly because the game was released at the end of SV and ZA is a ARPG, when WiWa gets it's own VGC ruleset, champions is gonna be deadier than the misty general
You now remember Caraway and Kajima.
Imagine if they do implement NFEs and then don't add eviolite.
>>59586640>it's almost as if Champions has a completely different target market and remit to games released as part of Pokémania and as part of Wii promotionProbably shouldn't have advertised it by directly comparing it to those games then
>>59587095This is a east/west divide issue. Japan knew it was supposed to be a battle engine, westoids thought it was supposed to be a full billy no-mates experience tacked onto a battle engine. While being free-to-play on top (fuck me lad, if it WERE supposed to be a stadium clone, they'd be charging for it, are you really this retarded???).
>>59587104>fuck me lad, if it WERE supposed to be a stadium clone, they'd be charging for it, are you really this retarded???I don't think it's as unreasonable as you're trying to make it sound to include a throwaway single-player mode. A Gym Leader Castle and PvP mode would barely be an acceptable level of content for a F2P game without the Pokemon brand name, especially one that's lifting most of its assets from pre-existing games.
>59587163Yep, she really is that retarded to expect single player content given for free. Sad.
>>59586039You have been warned multiple times already, its #1 purpose is to keep the competitive community in the loop (free advertisement) even if they fully legendize the console games.Everything else is an afterthought>>59586046So fine that it is artificially limited to 720p on mobile
>>59588223>single player content given for free.Literally what they do for their other mobile spinoffs
>>5958604630 fps feels like shit, no excuse why it can't run at 60 on a fucking Switch 2, also they still haven't fixed the resolution bug
>>59586039Fuck RankCasual mode should be incentivized by VP points
>>59586203It takes place in Frontier City and the cinematic intro/promo cycle leans heavily into the NPCs who just aren't integrated. I don't give a shit if you want a multiplayer only experience, the game sold itself as "battles for everyone", "battle your way", and then wrapped it up with a literal Battle Frontier skin. It's stupid. Make it multiplayer only, fine, but don't present it this way. It's greasy.
>>59586057>but they do buff themHow?
>>59588583They get to bask in the glow of Mega CHARIZARD Y
>>59586057>but they do buff them
>>59588446If you lose a Lot of battles they match you with bots
