But it’s not because “nu pokemon designs suck” or whatever nonsense; it’s because the GameBoy games let you actually fucking play and didn’t have long, tedious cutscenes with dialogue that went on forever.A lot of my favorite pokemon actually come from later gens (like toxtricity and dondozo), but the games they’re in are so boring to play.
>>59655502>1. OOPS WE FORGOT TO GIVE YOU A POKEDEX I AM A OLD MAN AND I HAVE NOT HAD MY COFFEE YET GO BACK AND DELIVER OAKS PACKAGE>2. HEY I NEED TO TEACH YOU YOUR POKEGEAR AS I DRAG YOU AROUND TOWN>3. YAPLORD WHO IS JUST BENCHWARMING FOR STEVEN ALSO IN FRLG EVERY MALE WILL USE BLUE TEXT AND EVERY FEMALE WILL USE RED TEXTthe best mon game of this generation was jade cocoon, period. pokemon was just there as a default because it was a crossroads between nintendo and playstation.
>>59655502story wise, I can agree. But to be honest, most of my time in pokemon games are spent in the post game playing in the battle facilities. I dont understand the point of replaying whole games when I have the most options for moves and mons by the end of it all...
>>59655502*Gens 1-4
>"old good, nu bad BUT DIFFERWENT :3"Die in a fire, you autistic little shit.
>>59655517>ALSO IN FRLG EVERY MALE WILL USE BLUE TEXT AND EVERY FEMALE WILL USE RED TEXTAnd?
>>59655743>4
Getting to the treasure hunt start in SV on a new run is fucking painful.
>>59655789nonsensical post
>>59655502>it’s because the GameBoy games let you actually fucking play and didn’t have long, tedious cutscenes with dialogue that went on forever.just say it's because it's comfy and nostalgic, which is the real reason and I would agree with you. Because with this you're pretending like that long ass hike to Mr. Pokémon before you can catch anything didn't exist in the first games where you can run into shinies
>>59655502You are correct.
>>59655502Actually it's both. Gens 1 - 3 had the best art style and design philosophy (INB4 "gen 2 had sooo many cute round simple face merchmons!!!) that for some reason they decided to throw in the garbage in exchange for the abhorrent art style and design philosophy of the newer games.So yes, the old games are better because the art and design is better, but also simply gameplay-wise, too.New games have shit designs (generally speaking), an awful design philosophy, and are shitty games to boot. All around a degradation of what once was a great franchise.
>>59657951Nobody is pretending. You just refuse to engage in good faith and try to dishonestly frame any difference in opinion as, "muh nostalgia" tripe.Seriously, grow up and get a life.
>>59655743nope
>>59657951>op gives a reasonable explanation as to why he prefers the older games>”huurrr it’s nostalgia”Reminder that gens Z and alpha are the only generations who are dumber than their parents.
>>59658187>>59658191keep ignoring the Mr. Pokémon bullshit, emotionally reactive faggots
>>59658198Not seeing a counter-argument. You're wrong and you know it.
>>59657951>>59658198It takes a couple of minutes, and it's one event at the start of the game. The modern games keep doing it through the whole game.
All are fucking garbage, palworld mogged it, roco kingdom doon
>>59658189There is a good amount of gen 1 and 3 pokemon that are just as detailed as garchomp.
>>59655502>Gen 4 is the cutoff point nowFascinating.You usually see people saying gen 3,5 or 6 are the cutoff point.
>>59659420Name 5.
