https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6jIrR9Iqq4Q
>>12597348>low resolution and garish colorsNo, thanks
>>12597367It works perfectly. Better than NES. It's a port from a decompile, everything is perfect.
>>12597348Watching the video and it feels like it was supposed to be played at 50 Hz, but played at 60 Hz
>>12597425Yes, that's true. Here's a better one with PAL, the game "recommends" it.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vjvaWc5re5Y
It's finally over.Nintendo cultist american millennials will HAVE to admit that the NES is a bad console now.
>>12597438Nobody's saying the NES is bad. Just that, it can't do anything the C64 can't do better.
>>12597415>Better than NES>worse resolution and worse colors>better
>>12597452Resolution is better, effectively double the NES. Plus six SID voices which together not only perfectly emulate the NES but also make it so there are no dropouts.
>>12597470>Resolution is better, effectively double the NES.
>>12597472Lookin' good in both your emulators there champ!
>>12597348>is actually bestNice thread, Pajeet.
>>12597482Pajeets didn't have Mario.
>>12597481Nah, C64 port looks like crap
>>12597492It's not a port, really. It's the same source code excepting obviously the VIC-II and SID parts and some other glue. It's smoother, nicer. Sounds better.
>>12597348>Less colors>Abysmal slowdownPretty disappointing, in all honesty. I thought the Intellivision port was way more impressive given the hardware.
what's the point when giana sisters exists?
>>12597486You're not going to believe me but I dated a refugee from North Korea and even she said she had Mario
>>12597415Shut up Tranny Smith
>>12597348https://youtu.be/6jIrR9Iqq4Q?si=RssSJ76DRuOx6ak7This shit ain't new! Go and shill your shitty video somewhere else
>>12597348C64 has better colors but unfortunately runs a tiny bit slower in heavier parts. In 1985 it would still be the best version because it would have fit in a disk though, no need to pay 10x more for a cartridge. Plus it had at least 15KB of extra space, allowing devs to add more content. Just like how C64 Elite port had more stuff.
>>12598772Weird way to spell Turrican.
>>12597494Like I said, C-R-A-P.
>>12597438>cultist american millennialsany more buzzwords you wanna add there, champ?
>>12599123amerillenials
>breaking a single block causes the game to slow down for like 2 seconds>"best on c64"
>>12599127Look, nintendo is bad, okay
>shittydor shittyfour>good for anythinglollmao
>>12597415> It's a port from a decompileNES games were written in assembly. There's nothing to decompile. Now if you mean it's from a disassembly that makes a lot more sense, but we've had those for decades now.
>>12599127>breaking a single block causes the game to slow down for like 2 secondsIt doesn't.
>>12599297>Noooo it actually only slows down for 1.879 seconds
>>12599127>>12599335It actually slows down when there are more than 3 enemies on screen, since each enemy in SMB performs collision, acceleration, and gravity simulation, straining the CPU. C64 has a weaker CPU (1MHz due to RAM refresh and GPU accessing shared memory) but a more powerful GPU than NES. Breaking blocks won't make it slow down. C64 handles a lot more sprites than NES games, but heavy simulation bogs it down.But of course nin toddlers don't understand how shit works.
>>12599412>"nooo it slows down because C64 has a better GPU!"
>>12598908>desaturated vomit, shit and piss colors>better
>>12599417>oversaturated diarrhea and piss colors >better If anything it's NES looking like piss with all those garish yellow and orange shit. C64 color palette looks smooth and metallic.
>>12599415This is an AI chatbot with zero reading comprehension.
NES has more games that stutter and slow down to a crawl than C64 does.
