>how does [not retro] match up to [not retro]?
>>12600565it was on windows, retard-kun
>>12600551Technically retro but spiritually not retro. Kys.
Just ask AI, it'll give you a 70% correct answer and then you can go fill in the blanks yourself
>>12600565>>12600864>>12600870Great job not contributing meaningfully to an objectively retro videogame thread and making this place worse than it already is
>>12600885Try playing something old than yourself, zoomzoom. Preferably 5th Gen
>>12600551It looked nice.But oh shit this game was boring.
>>12600551not retro and not good
>>12600551wasted potetnial, the combat system in this game sucked balls and was slow afit's mind blowing how the Ys Napishtim trilogy BTFO Trannies in the Sky trilogy just by having ARPG gameplay>>12600864>but spiritually not retro.it looks and play like a PS1 RPGbut the writting and the general vibes/aesthetic are that of a PS2 RPG