better than SA2
At being a bore! LOL
>>12611146
>>12611148>SA1fag wants to poke fun at glitchesAgain: LOLhttps://youtu.be/Xc_jndV7A_c
Let's settle it.https://strawpoll.com/xVg71LE3Qyr
>>12611152You have to be trying to do the thing in the video, the webm is just playing the game normally
>>12611163>You have to be tryinghttps://youtu.be/dXxrOPXxhpA?si=nPsc-M6VlE09SFbg&t=610Is this the hill you wanna die on, OP
>>12611169>tendieslop portNow post the non broken version
>>12611173That is the non broken version, only the Japanese original release had noticeably different collision
>>12611143Only by virtue of speed running autism
>>12611179The video itself contradicts you>the US Dreamcast version (the one that most people ended up playing) takes around a minute for the glitch to occur, as opposed to a few seconds with the other versions
>>12611184Per the video creator>To be completely fair to the other versions of Sonic Adventure the US Dreamcast version was my first time attempting the glitch after that was the international version where I eventually got the hang of it and found the sweet spot I just edited the video in a different order
>>12611187>eventuallyI tried it myself btw and nothing happened
>>12611173The "i-it's only glitchy on nintendo!" always sounded like cope.The game is buggy even on DC. If you love the game own the glitches, it's more sincere instead of nintendo scapegoat
Sonic even looks better in it. I like the lighting and shine on him whereas in SA2 the shade of blue is too dark and has no lighting
>>12611143Webkinz is better than both.
SA1>terrible nonsensical story where 5/6 characters aren't even plot relevant at all>glitches out the ass, you can even glitch into levels as unintended characters and crash the game>shitty gay fishing; Big is still faster than Amy who should have been a turtle instead of a hedgehog>watch the same cutscenes over and over again, fight the same bosses over and over again, play the same levels over and over again>get so fucking bored playing the same levels again and again that the recommended way to play the game is to just play Sonic's story and then quitSA2>absolute kino story that got made into a Hollywood blockbuster>some glitches but it's mostly a smooth time>picked the good playstyles from the first game and made them better, ranking system was the single best inclusion any Sonic game ever made>almost three dozen unique levels with all but two having new upgrades>entire game is terrific from start to finish
Did you like Speed Highway? Well that's great because in SA2 all of Sonic and Shadow's levels are repeats of that
>>12611146Based and true. What's with Adventure 1 faggots always whining about Adventure 2 anyways? They never shut up about it.
>>12611192https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SORYL5J1Heg Sorry, but your childhood tendie version is objectively shit. Should have been a Segachad.
>>12612016>SA2>is such a solid game that it can be a port of a port of a port and it still holds up>SA1>barely holding together, so janky that just porting it once causes the game to completely fall apart
>>12611192i never even one fucking time clipped through the rocks before that one loop in Emerald Coast on Dreamcast.
>>12611220>SA2>absolute kino story that received major plot point rewrites for a movie series that took 3 entries to make as much money as one (1) Mario moviefixed that for you.
>>12612082>>is such a solid game that it can be a port of a port of a port and it still holds uphttps://sonic.fandom.com/wiki/Sonic_Adventure_2/Glitchesdon't forget, SA2 was made by the same people responsible for DX.
i think it can't be denied that SA1 received the most attention, development wise. then SA2 received less. then Heroes received even less.then the dark times were here.
>>12611143It's a better game but it lacks the sexiest character in fiction
>>12611143SA2 sonic/shadow stages are better than anything in SA1, but 2 suffers because there aren't enough of them.
>>12612264>Mario out of nowhereSA1fag is mindbroken lmao>>12612279>shorter than the page for SA1Thanks lolhttps://breezewiki.com/sonic/wiki/Sonic_Adventure/Glitches>>126123462 has more than 1 has in any case
>>12612082SA1 was designed for real 3d hardware. Most of the porting effort went into making the game function on the more primitive "3d" hardware that has no actual concept of depth. This required major reworking of the game was required. The whole DX thing was mostly just them trying to cover up the porting downgrades behind the excuse of creative choice.
>>12612398>the superior 3D hardware ran the game at 30 FPS>the primitive fake 3D hardware ran it at 60K
>>12612335here is the only reason i bought SA2 instead of renting it.
>>12612385>SA1fag is mindbroken lmaosuch a kino story remember when Gerald was always alive in SA2 and he and Robotnik teamed up to do a Chemical Brothers dance and the military didn't mistake Shadow for Sonic
>>12612290SA1 had 10x more staff than SA2
>>12612420that's part of my point, yeah. Sonic Team wanted to concentrate more effort on PSO.
>>12612402So by that logic, if I built a console that did only monochrome wireframe 3d and ran at 120 fps it would be superior to the game cube. Because apparently functionality does not matter.The point is, the game cube, and pretty much every other console besides the Dreamcast, has no concept of what depth is. These primitive "3d" hardware draws triangles in the exact order they are submitted completely ignoring depth. They have this 2d frame buffer hack the z-buffer which they use to poorly pretend they actually know what depth is. But as soon as anything is transparent, it totally breaks.
>>12612398oh shit it's the Real 3D Hardware schizo
>>12612414Remember when we got Big the Cat fishing in a Hollywood movie- oh wait>>12612447Nope because the Gamecube SADX not only ran better than the Dreamcast SA1, it also looked better
>>12612619> it also looked betterIt looks like garbage
>>12612619It looks worse and is far buggier.
>>12612632>demasters destroying visuals as early as 2003
>>12612420and its still the worse game. sad.
>>12612632say what you want about the floors (thats honestly personal preference stuff), the water is WAY better. the original has such a small and obvious repeating texture pattern, but dx has a better look and the pattern is far less obvious, so it looks more natural. the text is better too. personally, i like the character lighting and rock walls better too, but thats a preference thing as well.
>>12611161you should at least specify whether its "which one do you like more" and "which is the better made/designed game" because then it at least forces the choice of honesty or dishonesty. you can like a game and still recognize it as worse. https://www.youtube.com/shorts/vVIEaxnrXeY
>>12612698>water glowing fluorescent blue>WAY betterlol, no
I prefer SA1 because more of the game I actually enjoy and the hubworlds were comfy. I only really like the Sonic and Shadow stages of SA2 but I dont like the full product as a whole at all. More power to people that prefer SA2 I've just never been able to get into it as much.
>>12612619>Nope because the Gamecube SADX not only ran better than the Dreamcast SA1see >>12612260>it also looked bettergoogle Lantern Engine
>>12612785way better vibe than looking like a tissue box.
>>12612840>google lantern enginewhy? i can see images of the end result. the means of running and producing those images is irrelevant. we're comparing results.
>>12612632>no you don’t understand, these higher poly models and higher resolution textures are actually worse because the game is too bright and colorful now that we aren’t using garbage can lighting!Wow you showed me good
>>12612903>no, you don't understand, the higher poly models and higher resolution textures are why it's better!you are the target audience for DLSS 5 lmao
>>12611192But what if you own the bugs including on the DC version and still think its better than DX?
