This made Japs piss shit and cum in 2000
>>12647495it's making me cum right now
>>12647515Same
>>12647495Gud game.Gud for them.
>li'l billboard sprite people on li'l 3D diorama worldsThis made me shit piss and cum in 2000
Looks anazing
>>12647495The meeting of two soulful styles, like a passing of the torch in a way.
>>12647495this makes me piss shit and cum
This made Japs cum white shit snakes but made Claps shit their panties in the 2000s
>>12648719Can someone upload that 500 page guidebook so I can finally understand how to play this
You write like a retard. You should vanish from the internet and die.
>dogshit 3Dalways a detriment to rpgs. rpgs should be 2D always.>predefined characters instead of building your own partyimmediately marks it as not worth playing compared to other DQ titles. no one cares about your shit waifu.
>>12649315>predefined characters wasn't that a thing already in DQ IV?
>>12649315Rpgs were you build your own party are the best but only DQ 3 and 9 let you do that
>>12647495it's the greatest video game ever made by mortal hands. kys?
>way more intricate and much longer than ff7>only uses half the discs
>>12647495FF7 characters had blocky Popeye arms and looked like crap.
>>12650065Don't the FMVs in FF7 take up a lot of space on the discs?
>came out way late in PS1 lifecycle>still sold more than FF7 in japanDQVII w
>>12649315You are a retarded larper, only DQIII and IX allow you to build your own party
>>12650226And 9 is 3D, so apparently the only DQ game he likes is DQ3. Based.
>>12650028>>12650226>>12650238>9not retro, DQ3 is the best in the series
>>12650987It's still 1 (one) out of 8 little bro, if you want to create your own party Dragon Quest isn't the franchise for you, try blobbers
>>12650987What amount of time has to pass in your eyes to consider something retro, anon? While I personally do not agree with this logic all of the time, I've heard it takes 15 years for something to become retro, and if we go by that logic, then that means Dragon Quest IX (which released in 2009 in Japan and 2010 everywhere else) would, in fact, be retro. Again, I have to clarify for anybody who didn't read this fully that this is not my own personal stance, I'm just playing a bit of devil's advocate.
>>12651027Can we stop moving these fucking goal posts or make some kind of pre-modern board for these retards? Retro stops meaning anything when it spans more than half the generations of the medium.
>>12651032time to face the music unc: you're old and only getting older. what you grew up with recedes further and further into the past. that doesn't magically preclude things that came after it from also joining the past.
>>12651071>>12651032>>12651027The only solution is calling gen 6 and 7 something like the twilight or transitioning era between retro and modern
>>12651071>time to face the music unc: you're old and only getting older.No shit, and I'm on the board for old games like I am, so fuck off with games that only seem old because you aren't. Game design changed multiple times between generation, and at this point the range of years dwarfs the amount of years needed before dumbasses like yourself consider things retro.
>>12651032I'm just fucking saying what I've heard people say is the general definition for "retro," dude
>>12651102And I'm saying this shit happens every few years because people like yourself think "retro" means "everything older than my arbitrary number of years is the same group." Grouping shit like waggle controls in with NES games is fucking retarded, at least split them into eras like comic books at that point. Instead we get people testing the waters every few years trying to shove newer shit into conversations.
>>12651119I'm not saying it's my own personal thoughts, dumbass. Did you miss the>While I personally do not agree with this logic all of the timeand the >Again, I have to clarify for anybody who didn't read this fully that this is not my own personal stance, I'm just playing a bit of devil's advocate.Also>at least split them into eras like comic books at that point.People already do this, do they not? At least with arcade games. I've heard the term "Golden Age" and "Silver Age" get passed around a bit in circles before
>>12651179>I'm just playing a bit of devil's advocate.Is why I'm saying to fuck off, because there are plenty of devils who advocate this shit regularly on the board and derail conversations like its doing right here.>People already do this, do they not? At least with arcade games. I've heard the term "Golden Age" and "Silver Age" get passed around a bit in circles beforeI meant in regards to the boards and this very conversation, dumbass. If people are too autistic to correctly apply a classification like retro without pedantically broadening the scope to the point it defeats the purpose, then split it further to avoid turning it into a board for everything thats more than a generation or two old. Especially since generations are getting so fucking long now, and the scope of retro based on retarded definitions like the one you devilishly advocated and totally don't agree with.
>>12651098unc gonna be 90 and still asserting that 7th gen isn't retro lmaooo
>>12647495wouldve been fine if they actually made some high quality sprites for the game like xenogearsthose sprites are literally snes tier
>>12651027Nintendo DS is not a platform launched in 2001 or earlier, nor is DQIX a game from 2007 or earlier. By the rules of this board, it is not retro.
>>12651368What do you expect? The developers only knew how to make 16-bit sprites and knew jack-shit about 3D modelling, so we got a shitty combination of outdated 2D and extremely-crude 3D. It's no wonder they went bankrupt.
>>12651361everything before the iphone was a different world, that should be the defined retro linepre and post slop era
